1of10
SEO YouTube
YouTube outlier finder with AI thumbnails, titles and video ideas
Au 24 oct. 2026, notre premier choix est vidIQ (GPA de 2.8), puis YouTube Studio et Rapidtags.
Classé par ToolGPA le 24 oct. 2026 · fiches vérifiées jusqu’au 23 oct. 2026
Trouvez des sujets de vidéos que les gens cherchent, écrivez des titres et des tags qu’on retrouve, et voyez ce qui fait grandir une chaîne.
vidIQ comes first because it covers keyword volumes, video ideas and title and tag suggestions inside the upload page, on the web, an extension and phones, from a free plan to $16.58 a month billed yearly. YouTube Studio is second as the free dashboard every channel already has, limited to channels you own or manage. Rapidtags is third for keyword scores and tags from $6 a month. TubeBuddy narrowly missed: it covers similar ground inside YouTube Studio, but no US price is on record and its extension does not support Firefox or Safari.
Formule gratuite · à partir de $16.58/mois
Pour : Most YouTube creators
vidIQ looks up YouTube keywords with search volume and competition scores, suggests daily video ideas and outliers, and shows suggested titles, descriptions and tags inside YouTube's upload page through its extension. It runs on the web, as a browser extension and on iPhone and Android. Free gives 150 AI credits a month; Boost is $16.58 a month billed yearly ($19 monthly) for one channel. Know the limits: every AI tool spends credits, the main tools are only partly open on Free, larger credit allowances have no price on the page, and more than 3 channels or several team members need the custom-priced Enterprise plan.
Tarifs et détails de vidIQGratuit
Pour : Anyone who wants to pay nothing
YouTube Studio is free for every channel, on the web and in iPhone, iPad and Android apps. Its Trends tab shows your audience's top searches over the last 28 days and breakout videos from similar channels, Analytics reports views, watch time and retention, and A/B tests try up to 3 titles or thumbnails on a long-form video. It is second because it shows numbers only for channels you own or manage and suggests no keywords or tags. A/B tests are desktop-only and skip Shorts, and some Trends insights are limited to certain countries, languages and devices.
Tarifs et détails de YouTube StudioFormule gratuite · à partir de $6/mois
Pour : Creators who want keyword scores and tags on a small budget
Rapidtags turns a video title into tags drawn from YouTube data, scores keywords for difficulty and search volume, shows the videos ranking for a term and checks where a video ranks. Free allows 10 tag generations, 3 keyword searches and 3 rank checks a day with ads; Starter is $6 a month for 25 searches and 10 rank checks a day. It is third because it covers the keyword side only, with no analytics, thumbnail help or testing, and runs on the web alone. Every plan has daily caps, there is no trial, and subscriptions are not refunded.
Tarifs et détails de RapidtagsClassé le 24 oct. 2026 d’après ce que montre chaque fiche et ce que les gens disent de l’outil, pas d’après nos propres tests. Comment nous classons
Le prix face à ce que vous obtenez
Going by our grades, vidIQ, YouTube Studio and UTubeKit give the most for the money among YouTube SEO tools: no tool on this chart scores higher without costing more.
Voir les 26 sur le graphique
Garder ou faire
Garder27À vous de voir2Faire0Vous pourriez faire au moins les bases de 2 de ces outils de SEO YouTube.
29 outils
SEO YouTube
YouTube outlier finder with AI thumbnails, titles and video ideas
SEO YouTube
Desktop YouTube outlier finder, paid once and run on your own API key
SEO YouTube
YouTube keyword, outlier and rank research inside Safari on the Mac
SEO YouTube
AI titles, thumbnails, descriptions and chapters for YouTube videos
SEO YouTube
Auto-rewrites YouTube titles and descriptions and posts to socials
SEO YouTube
Pre-publish scores for YouTube titles, descriptions and thumbnails
SEO YouTube
Invite-only YouTube analytics and keyword research for small channels
SEO YouTube
Niche finder, Chrome extension and MCP data for faceless YouTube
SEO YouTube
YouTube outlier and competitor research for expert-led channels
SEO YouTube
Outlier video ideas and Claude-written scripts in your channel's voice
SEO YouTube
Study winning YouTube channels, then script and build faceless videos
SEO YouTube
YouTube channel rankings, Super Chat stats and channel reports
SEO YouTube
YouTube tag generator with keyword research and video rank checks
SEO YouTube
Daily follower and view statistics for YouTube and four other networks
SEO YouTube
AI YouTube production: ideas, scripts, thumbnails and finished videos
SEO YouTube
A/B testing for YouTube thumbnails and titles, hourly or daily
SEO YouTube
YouTube revenue, retention and competitor analytics in one dashboard
SEO YouTube
YouTube browser extension for keyword research, SEO and A/B tests
SEO YouTube
YouTube keyword, competitor and trending-video research tools
SEO YouTube
YouTube niche and outlier finder with AI ideas and scripts
SEO YouTube
AI YouTube script writer with research, titles, tags and thumbnails
SEO YouTube
Free AI tools for YouTube titles, tags, descriptions and keywords
SEO YouTube
YouTube keyword research, video ideas and AI coaching for creators
SEO YouTube
Pre-upload video review with timecoded notes, titles and thumbnails
SEO YouTube
YouTube channel statistics, outlier videos and thumbnail research
SEO YouTube
Tracks competitor YouTube channels and flags their outlier videos
SEO YouTube
YouTube's free creator dashboard: analytics, search trends and tests
SEO YouTube
YouTube keyword research with competition data and rank tracking
SEO YouTube
YouTube SEO score, AI titles and scripts, and title A/B tests
Au 24 oct. 2026, ToolGPA classe vidIQ en premier (pour : most YouTube creators), YouTube Studio en deuxième (pour : anyone who wants to pay nothing), Rapidtags en troisième (pour : creators who want keyword scores and tags on a small budget).
D’après ce que montrent les pages de chaque outil (prix, formule gratuite, plateformes, fonctionnalités et limites) et d’après ce que les gens en disent dans les avis et les discussions publics. Pas d’après nos propres tests. La première place va à l’outil qui convient au plus grand nombre, et la deuxième et la troisième aux meilleurs choix pour les lecteurs qu’il laisse de côté.