800.com
Téléphonie pro
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Au 17 oct. 2026, notre premier choix est RingCentral (GPA de 3.0), puis Grasshopper et Quo.
Classé par ToolGPA le 17 oct. 2026 · fiches vérifiées jusqu’au 18 oct. 2026
Un numéro professionnel qui sonne sur votre ordinateur et votre téléphone, avec les appels, les SMS et la messagerie vocale partagés dans l’équipe.
RingCentral and Grasshopper are level on their report cards, and what separates them is how much phone system you need. RingCentral comes first as a full system with phone menus, queues, fax and meetings on computers and phones. Grasshopper is second for a solo owner or small team who wants a business number on their own phones at one flat price. Quo is third for small teams sharing a number and texting a lot. Dialpad narrowly missed: it starts at the same $15 as Quo, billed annually, but is $27 paid monthly. Google Voice is free only for personal Gmail accounts in the US.
Essai gratuit · à partir de $20/mois
Pour : Most businesses that want a full phone system
RingCentral puts calls, texts, fax, team chat and video meetings for up to 300 people in one app on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android. Core is $20 per user a month for 1-5 users, billed annually ($30 monthly), with unlimited US and Canada calling, phone menus, call queues and an AI assistant that takes call notes at no extra cost. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.83 from about 78,000 ratings. Know the limits: Core allows 25 texts per user a month, automatic recording and CRM integrations need Advanced at $25, and texting is left out of the 14-day trial.
application iPhone et iPad : 4.8 sur 5 sur App Store
Tarifs et détails de RingCentralEssai gratuit · à partir de $14/mois
Pour : A solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill
Grasshopper gives you a local, toll-free or vanity number that rings through its app on your own phone and computer, with calls, texts and voicemail in one shared inbox. True Solo is $14 a month for one user, and Solo Plus is $25 a month for unlimited users with three extensions, both billed annually. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.75 from about 46,000 ratings. It is second because it does a smaller job: there is no web app and no integrations on record, it is sold only in the US and Canada, and texting needs a $19.50 registration fee plus $1.50 a month.
application iPhone et iPad : 4.7 sur 5 sur App Store
Tarifs et détails de GrasshopperEssai gratuit · à partir de $15/mois
Pour : Small teams that share a number and text customers a lot
Quo, formerly OpenPhone, lets several teammates share one number with a common call and text history, and calls and texts to the US and Canada are unlimited under a fair use policy. Starter is $15 per user a month, billed annually ($19 monthly), on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android, and its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.4 from about 10,800 ratings. It is third because a team pays per person where Grasshopper charges one flat fee, and phone menus, call transfers, automatic recording and HubSpot or Salesforce need Business at $23 per user ($33 monthly).
application iPhone et iPad : 4.4 sur 5 sur App Store
Tarifs et détails de QuoClassé le 17 oct. 2026 d’après ce que montre chaque fiche et ce que les gens disent de l’outil, pas d’après nos propres tests. Comment nous classons
Le prix face à ce que vous obtenez
Going by our grades, RingCentral, Quo, Dialpad, Grasshopper and 1 more give the most for the money among business phone systems: no tool on this chart scores higher without costing more.
Voir les 19 sur le graphique
Garder ou faire
A phone system is not something to make for yourself. Numbers, calls carried over the phone network and texts registered with the carriers are a telecoms service, not an app.
Garder22À vous de voir0Faire0Aucun de ces systèmes de téléphonie professionnelle n’est à faire soi-même.
22 outils
Téléphonie pro
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Téléphonie pro
Cloud phone system with team chat, meetings and a receptionist console
Téléphonie pro
Cloud phone system for sales and support teams, with AI voice agents
Téléphonie pro
Low-cost virtual phone system with call and text bundles per user
Téléphonie pro
Virtual phone system with regional calling plans and a dialer suite
Téléphonie pro
Cloud call center phone system with dialers and AI voice agents
Téléphonie pro
AI business phone with live call transcripts and call summaries
Téléphonie pro
Google's phone number service for calls and texts on any device
Téléphonie pro
Virtual business number on your own phone, priced per account
Téléphonie pro
Cloud phone and SMS system for sales and support teams
Téléphonie pro
Calling and texting platform for sales teams that work in a CRM
Téléphonie pro
Cloud phone system with bundled minutes and texts per user
Téléphonie pro
Business phone, texting and video with an optional AI receptionist
Téléphonie pro
Small business phone system with a virtual receptionist, no contract
Téléphonie pro
Business phone app for calls and texts on shared team numbers
Téléphonie pro
Cloud predictive dialer with a built-in CRM for outbound call teams
Téléphonie pro
Cloud phone system with texting, fax, video meetings and team chat
Téléphonie pro
Business texting and calling that logs to your CRM
Téléphonie pro
Virtual phone system with call menus, texting and video meetings
Téléphonie pro
Business texting platform with a shared team inbox
Téléphonie pro
Virtual phone system for small US businesses with flat monthly plans
Téléphonie pro
Business phone lines with texting, video meetings and team chat
Au 17 oct. 2026, ToolGPA classe RingCentral en premier (pour : most businesses that want a full phone system), Grasshopper en deuxième (pour : a solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill), Quo en troisième (pour : small teams that share a number and text customers a lot).
D’après ce que montrent les pages de chaque outil (prix, formule gratuite, plateformes, fonctionnalités et limites) et d’après ce que les gens en disent dans les avis et les discussions publics. Pas d’après nos propres tests. La première place va à l’outil qui convient au plus grand nombre, et la deuxième et la troisième aux meilleurs choix pour les lecteurs qu’il laisse de côté.