800.com
Telefonia aziendale
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Al 17 ott 2026, la nostra prima scelta è RingCentral (GPA 3.0), poi Grasshopper e Quo.
Classificati da ToolGPA il 17 ott 2026 · schede controllate fino al 18 ott 2026
Un numero aziendale che suona sul portatile e sul telefono, con chiamate, messaggi e segreteria condivisi in tutta la squadra.
RingCentral and Grasshopper are level on their report cards, and what separates them is how much phone system you need. RingCentral comes first as a full system with phone menus, queues, fax and meetings on computers and phones. Grasshopper is second for a solo owner or small team who wants a business number on their own phones at one flat price. Quo is third for small teams sharing a number and texting a lot. Dialpad narrowly missed: it starts at the same $15 as Quo, billed annually, but is $27 paid monthly. Google Voice is free only for personal Gmail accounts in the US.
Prova gratuita · da $20/mese
Per: Most businesses that want a full phone system
RingCentral puts calls, texts, fax, team chat and video meetings for up to 300 people in one app on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android. Core is $20 per user a month for 1-5 users, billed annually ($30 monthly), with unlimited US and Canada calling, phone menus, call queues and an AI assistant that takes call notes at no extra cost. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.83 from about 78,000 ratings. Know the limits: Core allows 25 texts per user a month, automatic recording and CRM integrations need Advanced at $25, and texting is left out of the 14-day trial.
app per iPhone e iPad: 4.8 su 5 su App Store
Prezzi e dettagli di RingCentralProva gratuita · da $14/mese
Per: A solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill
Grasshopper gives you a local, toll-free or vanity number that rings through its app on your own phone and computer, with calls, texts and voicemail in one shared inbox. True Solo is $14 a month for one user, and Solo Plus is $25 a month for unlimited users with three extensions, both billed annually. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.75 from about 46,000 ratings. It is second because it does a smaller job: there is no web app and no integrations on record, it is sold only in the US and Canada, and texting needs a $19.50 registration fee plus $1.50 a month.
app per iPhone e iPad: 4.7 su 5 su App Store
Prezzi e dettagli di GrasshopperProva gratuita · da $15/mese
Per: Small teams that share a number and text customers a lot
Quo, formerly OpenPhone, lets several teammates share one number with a common call and text history, and calls and texts to the US and Canada are unlimited under a fair use policy. Starter is $15 per user a month, billed annually ($19 monthly), on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android, and its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.4 from about 10,800 ratings. It is third because a team pays per person where Grasshopper charges one flat fee, and phone menus, call transfers, automatic recording and HubSpot or Salesforce need Business at $23 per user ($33 monthly).
app per iPhone e iPad: 4.4 su 5 su App Store
Prezzi e dettagli di QuoClassificati il 17 ott 2026 da quello che mostra ogni scheda e da quello che la gente dice dello strumento, non da prove nostre. Come classifichiamo
Il prezzo contro quello che ottieni
Going by our grades, RingCentral, Quo, Dialpad, Grasshopper and 1 more give the most for the money among business phone systems: no tool on this chart scores higher without costing more.
Vedili tutti e 19 sul grafico
Tenere o fare
A phone system is not something to make for yourself. Numbers, calls carried over the phone network and texts registered with the carriers are a telecoms service, not an app.
Tieni22Decidi tu0Fallo tu0Nessuno di questi sistemi telefonici per aziende è da fare da sé.
22 strumenti
Telefonia aziendale
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Telefonia aziendale
Cloud phone system with team chat, meetings and a receptionist console
Telefonia aziendale
Cloud phone system for sales and support teams, with AI voice agents
Telefonia aziendale
Low-cost virtual phone system with call and text bundles per user
Telefonia aziendale
Virtual phone system with regional calling plans and a dialer suite
Telefonia aziendale
Cloud call center phone system with dialers and AI voice agents
Telefonia aziendale
AI business phone with live call transcripts and call summaries
Telefonia aziendale
Google's phone number service for calls and texts on any device
Telefonia aziendale
Virtual business number on your own phone, priced per account
Telefonia aziendale
Cloud phone and SMS system for sales and support teams
Telefonia aziendale
Calling and texting platform for sales teams that work in a CRM
Telefonia aziendale
Cloud phone system with bundled minutes and texts per user
Telefonia aziendale
Business phone, texting and video with an optional AI receptionist
Telefonia aziendale
Small business phone system with a virtual receptionist, no contract
Telefonia aziendale
Business phone app for calls and texts on shared team numbers
Telefonia aziendale
Cloud predictive dialer with a built-in CRM for outbound call teams
Telefonia aziendale
Cloud phone system with texting, fax, video meetings and team chat
Telefonia aziendale
Business texting and calling that logs to your CRM
Telefonia aziendale
Virtual phone system with call menus, texting and video meetings
Telefonia aziendale
Business texting platform with a shared team inbox
Telefonia aziendale
Virtual phone system for small US businesses with flat monthly plans
Telefonia aziendale
Business phone lines with texting, video meetings and team chat
Al 17 ott 2026, ToolGPA li classifica così: RingCentral al primo posto (per: most businesses that want a full phone system), Grasshopper al secondo posto (per: a solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill), Quo al terzo posto (per: small teams that share a number and text customers a lot).
Da quello che mostrano le pagine di ogni strumento (prezzo, piano gratuito, piattaforme, funzionalità e limiti) e da quello che la gente ne dice in recensioni e discussioni pubbliche. Non da prove nostre. Il primo posto va allo strumento che va bene al maggior numero di persone, e il secondo e il terzo alle scelte migliori per i lettori che restano fuori.