800.com
Business-Telefon
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Stand 17.10.2026: Unsere erste Wahl ist RingCentral (GPA 3.0), dann Grasshopper und Quo.
Platziert von ToolGPA am 17.10.2026 · Einträge geprüft bis 18.10.2026
Eine Geschäftsnummer, die auf Laptop und Handy klingelt, mit Anrufen, SMS und Mailbox, die das Team teilt.
RingCentral and Grasshopper are level on their report cards, and what separates them is how much phone system you need. RingCentral comes first as a full system with phone menus, queues, fax and meetings on computers and phones. Grasshopper is second for a solo owner or small team who wants a business number on their own phones at one flat price. Quo is third for small teams sharing a number and texting a lot. Dialpad narrowly missed: it starts at the same $15 as Quo, billed annually, but is $27 paid monthly. Google Voice is free only for personal Gmail accounts in the US.
Kostenlose Testphase · ab $20/monat
Für: Most businesses that want a full phone system
RingCentral puts calls, texts, fax, team chat and video meetings for up to 300 people in one app on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android. Core is $20 per user a month for 1-5 users, billed annually ($30 monthly), with unlimited US and Canada calling, phone menus, call queues and an AI assistant that takes call notes at no extra cost. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.83 from about 78,000 ratings. Know the limits: Core allows 25 texts per user a month, automatic recording and CRM integrations need Advanced at $25, and texting is left out of the 14-day trial.
iPhone- und iPad-App: 4.8 von 5 im App Store
RingCentral: Preise und DetailsKostenlose Testphase · ab $14/monat
Für: A solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill
Grasshopper gives you a local, toll-free or vanity number that rings through its app on your own phone and computer, with calls, texts and voicemail in one shared inbox. True Solo is $14 a month for one user, and Solo Plus is $25 a month for unlimited users with three extensions, both billed annually. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.75 from about 46,000 ratings. It is second because it does a smaller job: there is no web app and no integrations on record, it is sold only in the US and Canada, and texting needs a $19.50 registration fee plus $1.50 a month.
iPhone- und iPad-App: 4.7 von 5 im App Store
Grasshopper: Preise und DetailsKostenlose Testphase · ab $15/monat
Für: Small teams that share a number and text customers a lot
Quo, formerly OpenPhone, lets several teammates share one number with a common call and text history, and calls and texts to the US and Canada are unlimited under a fair use policy. Starter is $15 per user a month, billed annually ($19 monthly), on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android, and its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.4 from about 10,800 ratings. It is third because a team pays per person where Grasshopper charges one flat fee, and phone menus, call transfers, automatic recording and HubSpot or Salesforce need Business at $23 per user ($33 monthly).
iPhone- und iPad-App: 4.4 von 5 im App Store
Quo: Preise und DetailsPlatziert am 17.10.2026 nach dem, was jeder Eintrag zeigt und was Leute über das Tool sagen, nicht nach eigenen Tests. Wie unser Ranking entsteht
Preis gegen das, was du bekommst
Going by our grades, RingCentral, Quo, Dialpad, Grasshopper and 1 more give the most for the money among business phone systems: no tool on this chart scores higher without costing more.
Alle 19 im Diagramm ansehen
Behalten oder bauen
A phone system is not something to make for yourself. Numbers, calls carried over the phone network and texts registered with the carriers are a telecoms service, not an app.
Behalten22Deine Wahl0Bauen0Keine dieser Business-Telefonanlagen ist zum Selbstbauen.
22 Tools
Business-Telefon
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Business-Telefon
Cloud phone system with team chat, meetings and a receptionist console
Business-Telefon
Cloud phone system for sales and support teams, with AI voice agents
Business-Telefon
Low-cost virtual phone system with call and text bundles per user
Business-Telefon
Virtual phone system with regional calling plans and a dialer suite
Business-Telefon
Cloud call center phone system with dialers and AI voice agents
Business-Telefon
AI business phone with live call transcripts and call summaries
Business-Telefon
Google's phone number service for calls and texts on any device
Business-Telefon
Virtual business number on your own phone, priced per account
Business-Telefon
Cloud phone and SMS system for sales and support teams
Business-Telefon
Calling and texting platform for sales teams that work in a CRM
Business-Telefon
Cloud phone system with bundled minutes and texts per user
Business-Telefon
Business phone, texting and video with an optional AI receptionist
Business-Telefon
Small business phone system with a virtual receptionist, no contract
Business-Telefon
Business phone app for calls and texts on shared team numbers
Business-Telefon
Cloud predictive dialer with a built-in CRM for outbound call teams
Business-Telefon
Cloud phone system with texting, fax, video meetings and team chat
Business-Telefon
Business texting and calling that logs to your CRM
Business-Telefon
Virtual phone system with call menus, texting and video meetings
Business-Telefon
Business texting platform with a shared team inbox
Business-Telefon
Virtual phone system for small US businesses with flat monthly plans
Business-Telefon
Business phone lines with texting, video meetings and team chat
Stand 17.10.2026: ToolGPA platziert RingCentral auf Platz 1 (für: most businesses that want a full phone system), Grasshopper auf Platz 2 (für: a solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill), Quo auf Platz 3 (für: small teams that share a number and text customers a lot).
Nach dem, was die eigenen Seiten jedes Tools zeigen (Preis, Gratis-Plan, Plattformen, Funktionen und Grenzen), und nach dem, was Leute in öffentlichen Bewertungen und Diskussionen darüber sagen. Nicht nach eigenen Tests. Platz 1 geht an das Tool, das zu den meisten Leuten passt, und Platz 2 und 3 an die beste Wahl für die Leser, die dabei außen vor bleiben.