800.com
Zakelijke telefonie
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Op 17 okt 2026 is onze eerste keuze RingCentral (GPA 3.0), daarna Grasshopper en Quo.
Gerangschikt door ToolGPA op 17 okt 2026 · vermeldingen gecontroleerd tot 18 okt 2026
Een zakelijk nummer dat op je laptop en telefoon overgaat, met gesprekken, sms’jes en voicemail gedeeld binnen het team.
RingCentral and Grasshopper are level on their report cards, and what separates them is how much phone system you need. RingCentral comes first as a full system with phone menus, queues, fax and meetings on computers and phones. Grasshopper is second for a solo owner or small team who wants a business number on their own phones at one flat price. Quo is third for small teams sharing a number and texting a lot. Dialpad narrowly missed: it starts at the same $15 as Quo, billed annually, but is $27 paid monthly. Google Voice is free only for personal Gmail accounts in the US.
Gratis proefperiode · vanaf $20/maand
Voor: Most businesses that want a full phone system
RingCentral puts calls, texts, fax, team chat and video meetings for up to 300 people in one app on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android. Core is $20 per user a month for 1-5 users, billed annually ($30 monthly), with unlimited US and Canada calling, phone menus, call queues and an AI assistant that takes call notes at no extra cost. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.83 from about 78,000 ratings. Know the limits: Core allows 25 texts per user a month, automatic recording and CRM integrations need Advanced at $25, and texting is left out of the 14-day trial.
iPhone- en iPad-app: 4.8 uit 5 in de App Store
Prijzen en details van RingCentralGratis proefperiode · vanaf $14/maand
Voor: A solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill
Grasshopper gives you a local, toll-free or vanity number that rings through its app on your own phone and computer, with calls, texts and voicemail in one shared inbox. True Solo is $14 a month for one user, and Solo Plus is $25 a month for unlimited users with three extensions, both billed annually. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.75 from about 46,000 ratings. It is second because it does a smaller job: there is no web app and no integrations on record, it is sold only in the US and Canada, and texting needs a $19.50 registration fee plus $1.50 a month.
iPhone- en iPad-app: 4.7 uit 5 in de App Store
Prijzen en details van GrasshopperGratis proefperiode · vanaf $15/maand
Voor: Small teams that share a number and text customers a lot
Quo, formerly OpenPhone, lets several teammates share one number with a common call and text history, and calls and texts to the US and Canada are unlimited under a fair use policy. Starter is $15 per user a month, billed annually ($19 monthly), on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android, and its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.4 from about 10,800 ratings. It is third because a team pays per person where Grasshopper charges one flat fee, and phone menus, call transfers, automatic recording and HubSpot or Salesforce need Business at $23 per user ($33 monthly).
iPhone- en iPad-app: 4.4 uit 5 in de App Store
Prijzen en details van QuoGerangschikt op 17 okt 2026 op basis van wat elke vermelding laat zien en wat mensen over de tool zeggen, niet op basis van eigen tests. Hoe we rangschikken
Prijs tegenover wat je krijgt
Going by our grades, RingCentral, Quo, Dialpad, Grasshopper and 1 more give the most for the money among business phone systems: no tool on this chart scores higher without costing more.
Bekijk alle 19 in de grafiek
Houden of zelf maken
A phone system is not something to make for yourself. Numbers, calls carried over the phone network and texts registered with the carriers are a telecoms service, not an app.
Houden22Jij beslist0Maken0Geen van deze zakelijke telefoonsystemen is er een om zelf te maken.
22 tools
Zakelijke telefonie
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Zakelijke telefonie
Cloud phone system with team chat, meetings and a receptionist console
Zakelijke telefonie
Cloud phone system for sales and support teams, with AI voice agents
Zakelijke telefonie
Low-cost virtual phone system with call and text bundles per user
Zakelijke telefonie
Virtual phone system with regional calling plans and a dialer suite
Zakelijke telefonie
Cloud call center phone system with dialers and AI voice agents
Zakelijke telefonie
AI business phone with live call transcripts and call summaries
Zakelijke telefonie
Google's phone number service for calls and texts on any device
Zakelijke telefonie
Virtual business number on your own phone, priced per account
Zakelijke telefonie
Cloud phone and SMS system for sales and support teams
Zakelijke telefonie
Calling and texting platform for sales teams that work in a CRM
Zakelijke telefonie
Cloud phone system with bundled minutes and texts per user
Zakelijke telefonie
Business phone, texting and video with an optional AI receptionist
Zakelijke telefonie
Small business phone system with a virtual receptionist, no contract
Zakelijke telefonie
Business phone app for calls and texts on shared team numbers
Zakelijke telefonie
Cloud predictive dialer with a built-in CRM for outbound call teams
Zakelijke telefonie
Cloud phone system with texting, fax, video meetings and team chat
Zakelijke telefonie
Business texting and calling that logs to your CRM
Zakelijke telefonie
Virtual phone system with call menus, texting and video meetings
Zakelijke telefonie
Business texting platform with a shared team inbox
Zakelijke telefonie
Virtual phone system for small US businesses with flat monthly plans
Zakelijke telefonie
Business phone lines with texting, video meetings and team chat
Op 17 okt 2026 rangschikt ToolGPA RingCentral als eerste (voor: most businesses that want a full phone system), Grasshopper als tweede (voor: a solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill), Quo als derde (voor: small teams that share a number and text customers a lot).
Op basis van wat de eigen pagina’s van elke tool laten zien (prijs, gratis plan, platformen, functies en grenzen) en van wat mensen erover zeggen in openbare reviews en discussies. Niet op basis van eigen tests. De eerste plaats gaat naar de tool die bij de meeste mensen past, en de tweede en derde naar de beste keuzes voor de lezers die daarbuiten vallen.