CASEpeer vs Litify (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Litify grades higher than CASEpeer: 1.8 against 1.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Nov 12, 2026 · graded Nov 12, 2026 by ToolGPA
CASEpeer grades higher on platforms. Litify grades higher on value for money and features. They get the same grade on the free plan and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Litify
Salesforce-based legal platform for case, intake and matter management
Which one is for you
Pick CASEpeer if
- Fits if you run a personal injury firm and track treatment and liens
- Works for firms that want a client portal and statute alerts
Look elsewhere if
- Pricey if you add staff: $90 a user a month on Basic, $130 on Pro, $160 on Advanced
- Skip it if you practise anything but personal injury, since the vendor points other firms to MyCase
- Tight if you need intake or texting on Basic, as both start at Pro
- Watch out: e-signature is an add-on on every plan, and API access needs Advanced
- Watch out: the page does not say whether prices are billed monthly or annually
Pick Litify if
- Fits if you run a high-volume firm or an enterprise legal team already on Salesforce
- Works for firms that want intake, billing and reporting on one platform
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you are a solo lawyer, since the vendor speaks to large firms and legal teams
- Not for you if you need a price to plan with, as none is published
- Skip it if you want to try it yourself, because only a demo is offered
- Watch out: the platform is built on Salesforce, and its log-in goes there
- Watch out: only Salesforce and Chrome are listed as integrations
How we grade them
| 1.6GPACASEpeerWeak | 1.8GPALitifyWeak | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | DBasic is $90 per user a month, which is where the dearest tenth of law-practice tools starts against a $59 middle, and the useful extras sit on Pro at $130. | CNo price is published and pricing is recorded as unverified, which puts it in the middle. |
| Free plan and trial | FNo free plan and no trial; the page offers a demo with no card. | FNo free plan, no trial and no self-serve sign-up; the page offers a demo. |
| Features | CCase tracking, treatment, liens, settlements and a client portal are there, but e-signature is an add-on, intake and texting start at Pro, and it is built for personal injury only. | BIntake, matters, documents, time and billing, reporting and AI agents cover the job, with no gap named in the listing. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating is on record, and a case system needs your matters, stages and users set up. | CNo store rating is on record, and a Salesforce-based platform needs configuring and a guided rollout. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with Outlook, Microsoft 365, QuickBooks, Dropbox, LawPay, Zapier and EvenUp links. No native mobile app is listed, and API access needs Advanced. | CWeb only, with Salesforce and a Chrome extension as the listed integrations. |
| Best for | personal injury firms tracking cases and treatment | large firms and legal teams that run on Salesforce |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: CASEpeer and Litify. How we grade
Where they differ
- Litify also covers workflow automation and AI agents.
At a glance
| CASEpeer | Litify | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | $90 per user / month | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | 8am, LLC | Litify, LLC |
| Price read from | casepeer.com | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Nov 12, 2026 | Nov 12, 2026 |
Worth knowing
CASEpeer
- Built for personal injury; the vendor points firms with other practice areas to its sister product MyCase.
- The pricing page does not say whether prices are billed monthly or annually. It states no long-term contract or setup fee.
- Intake, texting, extra reports and the AI assistant start at Pro ($130); API access needs Advanced ($160).
- E-signature is an add-on on every plan, and the vendor does not list native mobile apps (the table says only mobile friendly).
Litify
- No prices are published; the vendor sells through a demo request, and pricing here is recorded as unverified.
- The platform is built on Salesforce, and the log-in button on the site goes to Salesforce.
- The vendor describes its solutions for high-volume firms and enterprise legal teams; solo-practice use is not addressed.
- No free trial or self-serve sign-up is offered on the pages we read.
Key features
CASEpeer
- Personal injury case tracking
- Medical treatment, injuries, liens and letters of protection, case expenses, settlement calculations and automated statute alerts sit inside each case.
- Client portal and texting
- Clients see case information in a portal. Pro adds unlimited two-way texting that accepts images; Advanced adds scheduled texts.
- Intake and case stages
- From Pro, intake management, case stage screens and litigation event plans cover the path from a new lead to a filed case.
- Reporting
- Pro includes reports on high-value cases, medical requests and firm productivity, with more than 50 others. Advanced adds data sync and multi-office reporting.
- AI writing assistant
- 8am IQ is listed from Pro. The vendor says it fixes grammar, changes tone and translates between English, Spanish and Arabic in case notes, tasks and client messages.
- Integrations
- The vendor lists connections to Outlook, Microsoft 365, QuickBooks, Dropbox, Google Calendar, LawPay and many lead-intake, records and AI tools.
Litify
- Intake management
- The vendor describes call and voicemail capture, AI-guided questionnaires and predictive lead scoring that lead into a signed case.
- Matter and document management
- Matters, client data and documents live in one platform, with AI document generation and PDF editing listed by the vendor.
- Time and billing
- Timekeeping and billing that follows client guidelines, plus a separate spend management area for expense tracking, budgets and invoice review.
- Reporting and analytics
- A no-code reporting engine that filters firm data into dashboards and KPIs.
- Litify ACE agents
- ACE 2.0 is the vendor's AI assistant. It runs multi-step workflows across matters, answers questions about the caseload and has a Chrome extension and voice-to-text.
- Practice-area solutions
- Packaged setups for personal injury, insurance defense, immigration and corporate legal departments, among 15+ practice areas the vendor mentions.
Plans
CASEpeer
Basic$90
per user / month; billing term not stated
Case and contact management, tasks, client portal, statute alerts, settlements, medical treatment tracking, expenses, client trust tracking and unlimited document storage.
Pro$130
per user / month; billing term not stated
Adds client intake, unlimited two-way texting, case stage screens, litigation event plans, 50+ more reports, 20+ integrations and the 8am IQ writing assistant.
Advanced$160
per user / month; billing term not stated
Adds scheduled texts, data sync for advanced reporting, a multi-office reporting suite, an intake investigator portal, case grades and API access.
Litify
Pricing could not be confirmed. See litify.com.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, CASEpeer or Litify?
As of Nov 12, 2026, CASEpeer starts at $90 per user / month, and Litify has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, CASEpeer or Litify?
As of Nov 12, 2026, neither CASEpeer nor Litify has a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.