800.com
Business Phones
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
A business number that rings on your laptop and phone, with calls, texts and voicemail shared across the team.
RingCentral and Grasshopper are level on their report cards, and what separates them is how much phone system you need. RingCentral comes first as a full system with phone menus, queues, fax and meetings on computers and phones. Grasshopper is second for a solo owner or small team who wants a business number on their own phones at one flat price. Quo is third for small teams sharing a number and texting a lot. Dialpad narrowly missed: it starts at the same $15 as Quo, billed annually, but is $27 paid monthly. Google Voice is free only for personal Gmail accounts in the US.
Free trial · from $20/mo
For: Most businesses that want a full phone system
RingCentral puts calls, texts, fax, team chat and video meetings for up to 300 people in one app on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android. Core is $20 per user a month for 1-5 users, billed annually ($30 monthly), with unlimited US and Canada calling, phone menus, call queues and an AI assistant that takes call notes at no extra cost. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.83 from about 78,000 ratings. Know the limits: Core allows 25 texts per user a month, automatic recording and CRM integrations need Advanced at $25, and texting is left out of the 14-day trial.
iPhone and iPad app: 4.8 out of 5 on the App Store
RingCentral pricing and detailsFree trial · from $14/mo
For: A solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill
Grasshopper gives you a local, toll-free or vanity number that rings through its app on your own phone and computer, with calls, texts and voicemail in one shared inbox. True Solo is $14 a month for one user, and Solo Plus is $25 a month for unlimited users with three extensions, both billed annually. Its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.75 from about 46,000 ratings. It is second because it does a smaller job: there is no web app and no integrations on record, it is sold only in the US and Canada, and texting needs a $19.50 registration fee plus $1.50 a month.
iPhone and iPad app: 4.7 out of 5 on the App Store
Grasshopper pricing and detailsFree trial · from $15/mo
For: Small teams that share a number and text customers a lot
Quo, formerly OpenPhone, lets several teammates share one number with a common call and text history, and calls and texts to the US and Canada are unlimited under a fair use policy. Starter is $15 per user a month, billed annually ($19 monthly), on the web, Mac, Windows, iPhone and Android, and its iPhone and iPad app averages 4.4 from about 10,800 ratings. It is third because a team pays per person where Grasshopper charges one flat fee, and phone menus, call transfers, automatic recording and HubSpot or Salesforce need Business at $23 per user ($33 monthly).
iPhone and iPad app: 4.4 out of 5 on the App Store
Quo pricing and detailsRanked on Oct 17, 2026 from what each listing shows and what people say about the tool, not from our own testing. How we rank
Price against what you get
Going by our grades, RingCentral, Quo, Dialpad, Grasshopper and 1 more give the most for the money among business phone systems: no tool on this chart scores higher without costing more.
See all 17 on the chart
Keep or make
A phone system is not something to make for yourself. Numbers, calls carried over the phone network and texts registered with the carriers are a telecoms service, not an app.
Keep20Your call0Make0None of these business phone systems is one to make.
20 tools
Business Phones
Toll-free, vanity and local business numbers with texting and AI
Business Phones
Cloud phone system with team chat, meetings and a receptionist console
Business Phones
Cloud phone system for sales and support teams, with AI voice agents
Business Phones
Low-cost virtual phone system with call and text bundles per user
Business Phones
Virtual phone system with regional calling plans and a dialer suite
Business Phones
Cloud call center phone system with dialers and AI voice agents
Business Phones
AI business phone with live call transcripts and call summaries
Business Phones
Google's phone number service for calls and texts on any device
Business Phones
Virtual business number on your own phone, priced per account
Business Phones
Cloud phone and SMS system for sales and support teams
Business Phones
Calling and texting platform for sales teams that work in a CRM
Business Phones
Cloud phone system with bundled minutes and texts per user
Business Phones
Business phone, texting and video with an optional AI receptionist
Business Phones
Small business phone system with a virtual receptionist, no contract
Business Phones
Business phone app for calls and texts on shared team numbers
Business Phones
Cloud phone system with texting, fax, video meetings and team chat
Business Phones
Virtual phone system with call menus, texting and video meetings
Business Phones
Business texting platform with a shared team inbox
Business Phones
Virtual phone system for small US businesses with flat monthly plans
Business Phones
Business phone lines with texting, video meetings and team chat
ToolGPA ranks RingCentral first (for: most businesses that want a full phone system), Grasshopper second (for: a solo owner or small team who wants one flat monthly bill), Quo third (for: small teams that share a number and text customers a lot). RingCentral and Grasshopper are level on their report cards, and what separates them is how much phone system you need. RingCentral comes first as a full system with phone menus, queues, fax and meetings on computers and phones. Grasshopper is second for a solo owner or small team who wants a business number on their own phones at one flat price. Quo is third for small teams sharing a number and texting a lot. Dialpad narrowly missed: it starts at the same $15 as Quo, billed annually, but is $27 paid monthly. Google Voice is free only for personal Gmail accounts in the US.
From what each tool's own pages show (price, free plan, platforms, features and limits) and from what people say about it in public reviews and discussions. Not from our own testing. First place goes to the tool that suits the most people, and second and third to the best choices for the readers it leaves out.