Elicit vs Scopus AI (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 13, 2026, we pick Elicit: it is first in our ranking of AI research tools, and it grades higher too, 2.4 against 1.6.
Checked Nov 9, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 · graded Nov 9, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA
Elicit grades higher on the free plan, features and platforms. Scopus AI grades higher on value for money. They get the same grade on ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Elicit
AI research assistant for literature search and systematic reviews
Scopus AI
Elsevier's AI summaries and concept maps over the Scopus database
Which one is for you
Pick Elicit if
- Fits if you're running a systematic review and want the screening and data extraction automated
- Works for students and casual readers, since free search, summaries and paper chat are unlimited
Look elsewhere if
- Pricey if you're outside a university, with Pro at $49 a user a month billed yearly and $75 monthly
- Skip it if you want real-time collaboration or extraction from figures on a budget, as both need Scale at $229 a user a month billed yearly, $375 monthly
- Tight if your workload is lumpy, because monthly usage doesn't roll over and extra is billed in $100 steps
- Watch out: the pricing page opens on industry rates, and the $11 academic Plus plan shows only once you switch
- Too light for phone or desktop use, with a web app and Chrome extension only, and an integration list that stops at Zotero
Pick Scopus AI if
- Fits if your university or company already subscribes to Scopus
- Works for people who want concept maps over Scopus results
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you are an individual, as it is sold to institutions through Elsevier sales
- Skip it if you want a price on the page, as none is published
- Not for you if you want answers from the wider web, as it uses only Scopus content
- Watch out: the page says it uses OpenAI's model hosted on Microsoft Azure, with an agreement against training use
- Skip it if you want to try it free, as no plan or trial is listed
How we grade them
| 2.4GPAElicitFair | 1.6GPAScopus AIWeak | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | DPro is $49 a user a month billed annually, $75 monthly, where paid plans in this category usually start around $12. Everything you'd come for sits up there: the review workflow, Routines, the API. Academic pricing only brings Pro to $39, and unused usage doesn't roll over. | CNo price is published, and the page's call to action is Contact us. |
| Free plan and trial | BBasic costs nothing and gives you unlimited search over 138 million papers, unlimited summaries and unlimited chat with papers, plus Zotero import. One person could really live on that. The Research Agent and reports are capped on Basic, and the listing can't say by how much. | FNo free plan and no trial are listed, so nothing can be tried without paying. |
| Features | BIt covers the whole job: search from a question across papers and 545,000 clinical trials, cited reports with tables and figures, screening and data extraction for a systematic review, a Zotero library, Routines and an API. Rivals here run systematic reviews too, so there's no trick that's Elicit's alone. | CSummaries, follow-up questions, foundational documents, concept maps and emerging themes. Answers come only from Scopus content. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating on record, and this isn't a box you type into and walk away from: there are screening workflows, extraction columns and a monthly usage pool to watch. The pricing page doesn't help, opening on industry rates with the $11 academic plan hidden until you switch. | CNo store rating on record. It sits inside an institutional Scopus login. |
| Platforms and integrations | BA web app plus a Chrome extension that fetches full texts through your institution's journal access, and it takes in Zotero, PDFs and .ris or .bib files. The integration list stops at Zotero though, the API starts at Pro, and there's no phone or desktop app. | CWeb only, with no integrations or apps listed. |
| Best for | systematic reviews and evidence tables | AI summaries over the Scopus database |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Elicit and Scopus AI. How we grade
Where they differ
- Elicit also covers AI agents.
- Scopus AI also covers chat assistant.
At a glance
| Elicit | Scopus AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan | Paid |
| Starts at | $49 per user / month, billed annually ($11 on academic pricing) | Not published |
| Free plan | Basic plan: unlimited search over 138 million papers, unlimited paper summaries and chat with papers, Zotero import, and limited Research Agent and report usage. | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Browser extension | ||
| Made by | Elicit Research, PBC | Elsevier |
| Price read from | elicit.com | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Nov 9, 2026 | Nov 13, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Elicit
- The pricing page defaults to industry rates; the $11 Plus plan appears only when Academic is selected.
- The systematic review workflow, Routines and API access start at the Pro plan.
- Monthly usage does not roll over. Extra usage on Pro and Scale is billed in $100 increments, up to a limit you set.
- Real-time collaboration, extraction from figures and the admin panel need Scale or Enterprise.
Scopus AI
- No price is published; the page's call to action is Contact us, so it is sold through Elsevier sales.
- Answers draw only on content in Scopus, not on the wider web.
- The page says it uses OpenAI's model hosted on Microsoft Azure, with an agreement against training use.
Key features
Elicit
- Research Agent
- Gathers evidence from scientific databases, journals, public data sources and uploaded documents, then produces cited reports, tables, figures and slides.
- Paper and clinical trial search
- Semantic search over more than 138 million papers from Semantic Scholar, PubMed and OpenAlex, plus about 545,000 clinical trials, so a query does not depend on exact keywords.
- Research reports
- Generates research briefs through a process modeled on systematic reviews. You can change which papers and what information a report covers.
- Systematic review workflow
- Automates screening and data extraction, with a Pro workflow that can screen 5,000 papers. A Chrome extension fetches full texts through your institution's journal access.
- Library and Zotero import
- Stores sources in collections with tags so they can be reused across projects, and takes in papers from Zotero, PDFs, and .ris or .bib files.
- Routines and API
- Routines rerun Research Agent work to pick up new evidence, and an API covers search, reports and systematic reviews. Both start at the Pro plan.
Scopus AI
- Topic and expanded summaries
- A query returns summaries with references to the Scopus documents used and an indication of the tool's confidence in their relevance.
- Follow-up questions
- Suggests Go deeper questions and takes conversational follow-ups, with a history of earlier topics to resume.
- Foundational documents
- Lists high-impact papers cited by the papers behind the summaries, mined from the full Scopus database.
- Concept maps
- Keywords from research abstracts produce an interactive map of a topic and its links to neighboring research areas.
- Emerging themes
- Groups a query's themes as established, rising or novel, to point to gaps for publications, collaborations and funding.
Plans
Elicit
Basic$0
Unlimited paper search, summaries and chat with papers, Zotero import, and limited Research Agent and report usage.
Pro$49
per user / month, billed annually ($588); $75 billed monthly
Standard usage, a systematic review workflow that screens 5,000 papers, 20 table columns at a time, Routines and API access.
Scale$229
per user / month, billed annually ($2,748); $375 billed monthly
5x the usage of Pro, real-time collaboration, extraction from figures, 30 table columns at a time and an admin panel with seat management.
EnterpriseCustom
Custom usage, SSO and SAML, screening of 40,000 papers, 40 extraction columns, custom data sources and unlimited API access.
Scopus AI
Pricing could not be confirmed. See elsevier.com.
Ways to pay less
Elicit
- Annual discount
Save 35% to 39% with annual billing
On industry pricing, Pro is $49 a month billed annually against $75 billed monthly, and Scale is $229 against $375. The pricing page labels these as savings of 35% and 39%.
- Education
Academic pricing from $11 per user / month
Choosing Academic on the pricing page shows Plus at $11, Pro at $39 and Scale at $89 per user / month, billed annually, or $19, $69 and $149 billed monthly.
- Nonprofit
Nonprofits can use the academic plans
Elicit has no separate nonprofit discount, but its help center says nonprofits can subscribe to the academic plans, its lowest pricing tier.
Scopus AI
No public discounts listed.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Elicit or Scopus AI?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Elicit starts at $49 per user / month, billed annually ($11 on academic pricing), and Scopus AI has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Elicit or Scopus AI?
As of Nov 13, 2026, only Elicit has a free plan. Scopus AI does not.
Which platforms do Elicit and Scopus AI run on?
As of Nov 13, 2026, only Elicit lists a browser extension. Both list a web app. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.