Harvey vs Hebbia (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Hebbia grades higher than Harvey: 1.8 against 1.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Nov 12, 2026 · graded Nov 12, 2026 by ToolGPA
Hebbia grades higher on platforms. They get the same grade on value for money, the free plan, features and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Which one is for you
Pick Harvey if
- Fits if you work at a law firm that runs client matters at volume
- Makes sense if you are an in-house legal team reviewing many contracts
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a price before a sales call, as none is published
- Not for you if you want to try it first, because there is no free plan or self-serve trial
- Skip it if you are not in legal or professional services, as the site is built for those teams
- Watch out: no integrations or API are listed, so ask what it connects to
Pick Hebbia if
- Fits if you work in banking, private equity or credit and review big document sets
- Works for law firms pulling terms out of many contracts at once
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a published price, as only a demo request is offered
- Skip it if you are an individual or small team, since it is aimed at institutional finance and legal work
- Watch out: connectors such as FactSet or PitchBook depend on a licence you pay for separately
- Not for you if you want a free try, because none is offered
How we grade them
| 1.6GPAHarveyWeak | 1.8GPAHebbiaWeak | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price is published and the site has no pricing page, so there is nothing to place against this category's $21 middle. | CNo price is published, only a demo request, so it sits at the middle of the category by default. |
| Free plan and trial | FNothing is free. The only call to action on the site is a demo request. | FNo free plan and no trial. You request a demo. |
| Features | CAgents, a document Vault, legal research, contract review and usage analytics are listed. The listing shows a product for legal work only, and its own page shows no integrations. | CA deal-team agent, a document grid, API access and connectors to FactSet, PitchBook, Datasite and Box. The listing notes several connectors need your own data licence. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating on record, and a firm has to be onboarded and set up before anyone uses it. | CNo store rating on record, and it has to be connected to your data rooms and licences before it does anything. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only, with no integrations or API listed on the pages read. | BWeb, with a long list of finance and storage connectors, plus an API for building your own front ends. |
| Best for | law firms and legal teams that buy through sales | finance and legal teams reading large piles of documents |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Harvey and Hebbia. How we grade
Where they differ
- Harvey also covers chat assistant.
- Hebbia also covers AI search.
In commonWebAI agentsResearchDocuments
At a glance
| Harvey | Hebbia | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Harvey AI Corporation | Hebbia |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Nov 12, 2026 | Nov 12, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Harvey
- No prices are published and the pricing page does not exist; the only call to action is Request a Demo.
- No free plan or self-serve trial is shown.
- The site is built for legal and professional services teams.
Hebbia
- No prices are published; the site only offers a demo request.
- It is built for institutional finance and legal work, not for individuals or small teams without those data sources.
- Many data connectors, such as FactSet or PitchBook, depend on the firm having its own license for that data.
Key features
Harvey
- Agents for legal work
- Agents take on complex legal tasks, with work routed automatically to the right agent.
- Vault
- Stores and organizes large sets of documents so a team can pull out information with a single query.
- Knowledge
- Legal, regulatory and tax research.
- Spaces
- Shared workspaces for firms, clients and co-counsel, with the ethical walls sensitive legal work requires.
- Contract Intelligence
- Contract review and negotiation support, plus insights across a portfolio of contracts.
- Command Center
- Usage analytics by team, practice group and office, with benchmarks against comparable organizations.
Hebbia
- Max
- An agent that takes on deal-team tasks such as modeling, screening a target list, spreading comps and recapping earnings calls from the firm's own data.
- Matrix
- A grid where rows are companies or documents and columns are questions, so one analysis runs across many sources at once.
- Financial and filings data
- Integrations listed include FactSet, S&P Global, PitchBook, Fitch Solutions, Octus and Moody's, alongside SEC filings and earnings transcripts.
- Data room and file connections
- Connectors are listed for Datasite, SharePoint, OneDrive, Box, Dropbox and Snowflake.
- API access
- The platform page shows firms building their own tools on Hebbia's API, including white-labeled front ends.
- Security controls
- The vendor says customer data is never used to train models, is siloed per customer, and can be processed regionally in the US or EU or on a dedicated tenant.
Plans
Harvey
Pricing could not be confirmed. See harvey.ai.
Hebbia
Pricing could not be confirmed. See hebbia.com.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Harvey or Hebbia?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Harvey has no price we could confirm, and Hebbia has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Harvey or Hebbia?
As of Nov 12, 2026, neither Harvey nor Hebbia has a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.