Hreflang Tags Testing Tool vs Screaming Frog SEO Spider (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Hreflang Tags Testing Tool grades higher than Screaming Frog SEO Spider: 3.0 against 2.4 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 17, 2026 and Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 17, 2026 and Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Hreflang Tags Testing Tool grades higher on value for money, the free plan, ease of use and platforms. Screaming Frog SEO Spider grades higher on features.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Hreflang Tags Testing Tool
Free validator that checks hreflang tags across a list or sitemap
Screaming Frog SEO Spider
Desktop website crawler for technical SEO audits
Which one is for you
Pick Hreflang Tags Testing Tool if
- Fits if you're checking a multilingual site's hreflang setup before launch
- Works for tracking down missing return tag errors from Search Console
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if your hreflang lives in XML sitemaps or you use a sitemap index, as neither is read
- Not for you if you don't have LinkedIn, the only way to sign in for higher limits and the API
- Tight if your site is large: 30 URLs a test without signing in, and anything past the signed-in limit arranged by email
- Watch out: its pages give different signed-in limits (100 or 250 URLs a test), and the API docs mention a premium tier with no price
- Watch out: the maker describes it as a hobby project run by one person
Pick Screaming Frog SEO Spider if
- Fits if you're a technical SEO who audits large sites from your own computer
- Works for sites under 500 URLs, which the free version crawls with no time limit
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want keyword research, rank tracking or backlinks, as it only crawls
- Not for you if you'd rather not learn technical SEO terms, XPath or regex
- Tight if your computer is short on memory or storage, since crawl size depends on it, and there's no web or phone version
- Pricey if a team needs it: licences are $279 per user a year, so two people need two
- Watch out: the free version can't save crawls, render JavaScript, schedule audits or connect to Google data
How we grade them
| 3.0GPAHreflang Tags Testing ToolVery good | 2.4GPAScreaming Frog SEO SpiderFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | AFree, with no paid plan to buy. Signing in adds test history and an API key at no cost. | BGraded against its alternatives. A licence is $279 a year per user, about $23.25 a month, with no crawl limit and JavaScript rendering. Only Sitebulb Lite is cheaper, and it stops at 10,000 URLs; Semrush and Ahrefs cost about five times as much. |
| Free plan and trial | AFree outright. Up to 30 URLs a test without an account, more with a free LinkedIn sign-in, and the free API allows 50 URLs a test and 10 tests a day. | BA free version with no sign-up crawls up to 500 URLs with the core audits, for as long as you like, so small sites can live on it. It can't save crawls, change settings, render JavaScript or pull in Google data. |
| Features | DOne narrow job: hreflang checks on a URL list or sitemap, covering return tags, codes, canonicals, x-default and status codes, with Excel export. It doesn't read hreflang declared inside XML sitemaps, and sitemap index files aren't supported. | CIt does the crawling job fully: 300+ issues, JavaScript rendering, custom extraction, scheduling, crawl comparison and sitemaps. But that's one part of SEO, with no keyword research, rank tracking or backlink index. |
| Ease of use | BNo rating on record, and nothing to sign up for: paste URLs or a sitemap and run the test. Signing in is optional, for higher limits. | CNo rating on record. Enter a URL and it crawls, but reading the results takes technical SEO knowledge, and custom extraction runs on XPath, CSS Path or regex. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with a free REST API for signed-in users to submit URL lists or sitemaps and fetch results. No other integrations on record. | CA program for Windows, Mac and Linux, linked to Google Analytics, Search Console, PageSpeed Insights, OpenAI, Gemini, Looker Studio and Sheets. Computers only, with no web or phone version. |
| Best for | checking hreflang tags on a multilingual site | technical site audits on your own computer |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Hreflang Tags Testing Tool and Screaming Frog SEO Spider. How we grade
Where they differ
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider also covers reports.
At a glance
| Hreflang Tags Testing Tool | Screaming Frog SEO Spider | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free plan |
| Starts at | Free | $279 per user / year |
| Free plan | Free to use. Tests up to 30 URLs at a time without an account; signing in with LinkedIn raises the limit, adds test history and gives an API key. | Free version, no sign-up: crawls up to 500 URLs at a time with the core audits, but cannot save crawls, change the crawl configuration, render JavaScript or use integrations. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| macOS | ||
| Windows | ||
| Linux | ||
| Made by | Nikhilesh Jasuja | Screaming Frog Ltd |
| Price read from | hreflang.org | screamingfrog.co.uk |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 17, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Hreflang Tags Testing Tool
- Hreflang declared inside XML sitemaps is not analyzed; the sitemap is only used to find URLs.
- Signing in works only through a LinkedIn account.
- Its pages give different limits for signed-in users (100 or 250 URLs per test), and higher limits are arranged by email.
- The maker describes it as a hobby project; the API docs mention a premium tier with no published price.
Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- Licences are per user and last one year; two people need two licences.
- It is a desktop app, so crawl size depends on the computer's memory and storage.
- The free version cannot save crawls, render JavaScript, schedule audits or connect to Google data.
Key features
Hreflang Tags Testing Tool
- List or sitemap crawl
- Tests a pasted list of URLs, one per line, or every page in an XML sitemap. Sitemap index files are not supported.
- Return tag and cluster checks
- Confirms that every page in a language cluster links back to the others and references itself in its own hreflang set.
- Code, canonical and x-default checks
- Flags invalid ISO language and country codes, duplicates, canonicals pointing to another URL and a missing x-default.
- Page health
- Checks that every hreflang URL answers with a 200 status rather than a redirect, 404 or 403. Hreflang sent in HTTP headers is read too.
- Excel export and history
- Results can be exported to an Excel workbook, and signed-in users can see past tests, re-run them and save favorites.
- Free REST API
- Signed-in users can generate an API key to submit URL lists or sitemaps and fetch results; the free tier allows 50 URLs per test and 10 tests a day.
Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- Technical SEO audit
- Find broken links, server errors, redirect chains, missing or duplicate titles and descriptions, and directives such as noindex and canonicals.
- JavaScript rendering
- With a licence, render pages in a built-in Chromium to crawl sites built with frameworks such as React, Angular and Vue.
- Custom extraction and search
- Pull any data from page HTML with XPath, CSS Path or regex, and search source code across a whole crawl (licence only).
- Google and AI integrations
- Pull Google Analytics, Search Console and PageSpeed Insights data into a crawl, or run pages through OpenAI and Gemini (licence only).
- Scheduling and crawl comparison
- Schedule crawls with exports to Google Sheets or run them from the command line, and compare crawls or staging against production.
- Site visualisations and sitemaps
- See site structure as force-directed and tree diagrams, and generate XML and image sitemaps from a crawl.
Plans
Hreflang Tags Testing Tool
Free$0
Hreflang tests on a URL list or sitemap, 30 URLs per test without signing in and more with a free LinkedIn login.
Screaming Frog SEO Spider
Free$0
Up to 500 URLs per crawl, broken links, redirects, metadata, duplicates, XML sitemaps and site visualisations.
Paid licence$279
per user / year, for 1 to 4 licences
No crawl limit beyond memory and storage, saved crawls, scheduling, JavaScript rendering, crawl comparison, integrations and support. £199 in pounds.
Ways to pay less
Hreflang Tags Testing Tool
No public discounts listed.
Screaming Frog SEO Spider
- Other savings
Volume pricing from 5 licences
Buying 5 to 9 licences at once costs $265 each a year, 10 to 19 cost $249 each, and 20 or more cost $235 each, against $279 for 1 to 4.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Hreflang Tags Testing Tool or Screaming Frog SEO Spider?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Hreflang Tags Testing Tool is cheaper to start with: it is free, against $23.25 a month when paid by the year for each person for Screaming Frog SEO Spider. Hreflang Tags Testing Tool is free, and Screaming Frog SEO Spider starts at $279 per user / year.
Which has a free plan, Hreflang Tags Testing Tool or Screaming Frog SEO Spider?
As of Oct 23, 2026, both Hreflang Tags Testing Tool and Screaming Frog SEO Spider have a free plan.
Which platforms do Hreflang Tags Testing Tool and Screaming Frog SEO Spider run on?
As of Oct 23, 2026, only Hreflang Tags Testing Tool lists a web app and only Screaming Frog SEO Spider lists macOS, Windows and Linux apps. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
- Hreflang Tags Testing Tool vs Sitebulb
- Hreflang Tags Testing Tool vs Google Search Console
- Hreflang Tags Testing Tool vs SEO Site Checkup
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Sitebulb
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Semrush
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Ahrefs
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs SEO PowerSuite
- Screaming Frog SEO Spider vs Seobility
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.