Qumu vs YuJa (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 13, 2026, YuJa grades higher than Qumu: 2.2 against 1.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Nov 13, 2026 · graded Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA
YuJa grades higher on the free plan, features and platforms. They get the same grade on value for money and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Which one is for you
Pick Qumu if
- Fits if you are a large company that needs secure live and recorded video
- Works for regulated teams such as banks and insurers that need access controls
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want a price before you talk to anyone, as none is published
- Not for you if you are one person or a small team, since it is built for enterprises
- Skip it if you want to try it first: no free tier or trial is listed
- Watch out: qumu.com now redirects to Enghouse Video, where Qumu is one of several brands
Pick YuJa if
- Fits if you run lecture capture at a school or university and need LMS links
- Works for IT teams that want captioning and compliance tools in one video cloud
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want a price on the page, as each license is customised
- Not for you if you are a solo creator, since it is built for institutions
- Watch out: the GenAI PowerPack, FeedbackFlow and Himalayas archiving are separate modules
- Watch out: the trial and pilot terms aren't stated on the pricing page
How we grade them
| 1.6GPAQumuWeak | 2.2GPAYuJaFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price is published, so there is nothing to grade against the category. The page points to booking a demo. | CNo list prices. Each license is quoted, so there is nothing to grade against the category. |
| Free plan and trial | FNo free tier or trial. A demo is the only offer. | DA free trial program and paid pilots are mentioned, but the pricing page gives no terms, length or card details. |
| Features | CLive and recorded video, access controls, portals with search, analytics and interactive video through a hihaho integration. The page gives few details on limits. | BVideo storage, a branded portal, captioning, lecture capture software and hardware, live streaming, LMS gradebook sync and analytics. The GenAI PowerPack is an extra module. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating on record. An enterprise rollout through sales, with portals and workflows to configure. | CNo store rating on record. A school rollout with LMS links and capture hardware to set up. |
| Platforms and integrations | CBrowser-based only, with no apps listed. hihaho is the only integration named. | BWeb platform with browser, mobile and hardware capture and LMS integrations. No list of named apps or operating systems. |
| Best for | large companies streaming town halls and training video | lecture capture and video for schools and universities |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Qumu and YuJa. How we grade
Where they differ
- Qumu also covers reports.
- YuJa also covers screen recording and video editing.
At a glance
| Qumu | YuJa | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Free trial |
| Starts at | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | Free trial program and paid pilot programs, per the pricing page |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Enghouse Video | YuJa |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Nov 13, 2026 | Nov 13, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Qumu
- No prices are published on the Qumu page; it points to booking a demo with Enghouse Video.
- The old qumu.com address now redirects to the Enghouse Video site, where Qumu is listed as one of its brands.
- The page lists no downloadable apps; it describes browser-based video portals and live broadcasting.
YuJa
- No list prices: the pricing page says each license is customized, with a request-a-quote form and a price match promise.
- The GenAI Video PowerPack and the FeedbackFlow and Himalayas archiving modules are listed as separate modules.
- A free trial and paid pilot programs are mentioned, but their terms are not stated on the pricing page.
- The page mentions mobile and tablet capture apps without naming operating systems.
Key features
Qumu
- Live broadcasting
- Make live and recorded video available to employee and customer audiences with secure delivery, aimed at town halls and executive communications.
- Video management and access control
- Organize and share videos with workflows and access controls, for compliance-minded teams such as banks and insurers.
- Portal and search
- Video portals or microsites host content in one place, with search so viewers can find videos directly.
- Analytics
- Engagement data on how people watch, to help teams judge which videos perform.
- Interactive video via hihaho
- An integration with hihaho adds clickable menus, quizzes and calls to action, with AI-driven captions, translations and accessibility tools.
YuJa
- Video cloud
- Lumina stores, organizes and streams media, with a branded VideoTube portal, captioning, search and a video and image editor.
- Lecture capture
- Capture Cloud covers software, browser, mobile and hardware recording, including 1U rack appliances for capture and encoding, plus live streaming.
- LMS integration
- Connects to existing learning management systems, and video quizzes can sync scores to the LMS gradebook.
- Video analytics
- Reports on how video is watched and its impact, with actionable insights for instructors and administrators.
- GenAI Video PowerPack
- An add-on module that automates audio descriptions, interactive Q&A, multilingual versions and video navigation.
Plans
Qumu
Pricing could not be confirmed. See enghousevideo.com.
YuJa
Pricing could not be confirmed. See yuja.com.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Qumu or YuJa?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Qumu has no price we could confirm, and YuJa has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Qumu or YuJa?
As of Nov 13, 2026, neither Qumu nor YuJa has a free plan. YuJa has a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.