Skip to content

Sitebulb vs squirrelscan (2026): which should you pick?

As of Oct 23, 2026, squirrelscan grades higher than Sitebulb: 2.8 against 2.6 out of 4.0.

Checked Oct 17, 2026 and Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 17, 2026 and Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA

Sitebulb grades higher on ease of use. squirrelscan grades higher on value for money and the free plan. They get the same grade on features and platforms.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

Sitebulb

Website auditing crawler for Windows and Mac, with a cloud edition

Free trial · from $18/mo

squirrelscan

Open-source site audit CLI whose fixes are written for coding agents

Free plan · from $19/mo

Which one is for you

Pick Sitebulb if

  • Fits if you want each audit finding ranked by priority with an explanation of what to do
  • Works for freelancers auditing sites under 10,000 URLs, from $180 a year on Lite

Look elsewhere if

  • Tight if your site is big, as Lite stops at 10,000 URLs per audit and lacks scheduling, comparisons and several reports
  • Pricey if you want it in the browser, as Sitebulb Cloud starts at $125 a month and needs at least 2 users
  • Skip it if you need keyword research or rank tracking, as it only audits
  • Watch out: desktop crawls depend on your computer; Pro's default cap is 500,000 URLs, and more users are from $11 a month each
  • Watch out: there's no free plan after the 14-day trial, and paying by invoice or purchase order is for yearly plans only

Pick squirrelscan if

  • Fits if you fix sites with Claude Code, Cursor or another coding agent
  • Works for CI pipelines that should fail a build when the audit score drops

Look elsewhere if

  • Skip it if you don't use a terminal, as it's a command-line tool first
  • Watch out: the terms call it a beta product, and the CLI is still at version 0.0.x
  • Tight if you lean on cloud audits, at 50 credits plus 2 a page, with credits that reset each month
  • Tight if you stay free, as cloud audits stop at 500 pages and top-ups are for paid plans only
  • Pricey if you want white-label reports or pooled credits, which need Team at 2 seats of $29

How we grade them

2.6GPASitebulbGood2.8GPAsquirrelscanGood
Value for money
BGraded against its alternatives. Lite is $180 a year, $15 a month, for 1 user and 10,000 URLs per audit, cheaper than Screaming Frog's $279 and far under Semrush or Ahrefs. Pro, with scheduling and comparisons, is $425 a year.
ALocal audits from the MIT-licensed CLI are free and unlimited on your own computer. Cloud audits go further on Pro at $19 a month ($190 a year), between this category's cheaper quarter and its middle.
Free plan and trial
CNo free plan, but the 14-day trial needs no card and works like Sitebulb Pro on the desktop.
ALocal CLI audits cost nothing and have no cap. A free account adds 500 cloud credits a month, about 5 cloud audits of up to 500 pages, and a weekly audit of one site, with no card.
Features
CIt does the audit job fully: 100+ hints on Lite or 300+ on Pro, JavaScript crawling on every plan, crawl maps and MCP. But auditing is one slice of SEO, and Lite lacks scheduling, comparisons and several report types.
C300+ rules across SEO, crawlability, links, schema, hreflang, Core Web Vitals, security headers, accessibility and AI crawler readiness, with CI exit codes and an MCP server. The gaps: the terms call it beta, and browser rendering for JavaScript sites is cloud only.
Ease of use
BNo rating on record, but there's little to set up: install it, start an audit, and each problem comes ranked by priority with an explanation in plain terms.
DNo rating on record. It's a command-line binary, so you work in a terminal or through a coding agent, and cloud audits mean watching a credit balance.
Platforms and integrations
BDesktop apps for Windows and Mac plus Sitebulb Cloud in the browser, with Google Analytics, Search Console, Sheets, Looker Studio, Claude and ChatGPT. The cloud version is priced separately, from $125 a month.
BMac, Windows and Linux, with cloud audits and published reports on the web, and skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI and Windsurf. No phone app.
Best forsite audits explained in plain wordssite audits whose fixes a coding agent can apply

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Sitebulb and squirrelscan. How we grade

Where they differ

  • squirrelscan is open source, according to its own site.
  • Sitebulb also covers reports.
In commonWindowsmacOSWebSite audit

At a glance

Sitebulbsquirrelscan
PricingFree trialFree plan
Starts at$18 per month, billed monthly$19 per month, billed monthly
Free planNoneLocal CLI audits are free and unlimited. A free account adds 500 cloud credits a month (about 5 cloud audits of up to 500 pages) and a weekly audit of one site.
Free trial14-day free trial equal to Sitebulb Pro desktop, no credit cardNone listed
Web
macOS
Windows
Linux
Made bySitebulb LimitedNineprimes Pty Ltd
Price read fromsitebulb.comsquirrelscan.com
CheckedOct 17, 2026Oct 23, 2026

Worth knowing

Sitebulb

  • Lite caps each audit at 10,000 URLs and lacks scheduling, comparisons and several report types.
  • Desktop crawls are limited by the computer: Pro's default cap is 500,000 URLs, raisable to 2 million.
  • Sitebulb Cloud is priced separately, from $125 a month, and needs at least 2 users.
  • Purchase order and invoice payment is only for yearly plans.

squirrelscan

  • The terms call it a beta product, and the CLI is still at version 0.0.x.
  • Cloud audits cost 50 credits plus 2 per page, and 1 more per external link checked; monthly credits reset and do not roll over.
  • Free cloud audits stop at 500 pages with one weekly scheduled site, and only paid plans can buy top-ups ($1 per 100 credits, from $10).
  • Team is sold per seat with a 2-seat minimum, and pooled credits, roles and white-label reports come only with it.

Key features

Sitebulb

Prioritized hints
Each audit flags issues against 100+ hints on Lite or 300+ on Pro, ranked by priority and explained in plain terms.
JavaScript crawling
Render JavaScript-heavy sites during a crawl on every plan, at no extra cost.
Audit comparison and scheduling
On Pro, compare audits to see what changed and schedule audits to run automatically, with auto-export to Google Sheets.
Crawl maps and reports
See site structure as visual crawl maps, and on Pro produce customized PDF reports for clients.
Pro-only checks
Pro adds performance and mobile, structured data, hreflang, spelling, accessibility and AMP reports.
MCP access
Connect audits to Claude, ChatGPT and other AI tools through Sitebulb's MCP server, included on every plan.

squirrelscan

300+ audit rules in 22 categories
Checks core SEO, crawlability, links, schema, hreflang, Core Web Vitals, security headers, accessibility, E-E-A-T signals and AI crawler readiness such as llms.txt.
Fixes written for coding agents
Every finding comes with its fix in output an agent can apply. Skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and others run an audit, fix and re-audit loop.
CLI, MCP server and CI gate
A single binary for macOS, Windows and Linux, a local MCP server that exposes the audit as agent tools, and exit codes that can fail a build on score or severity.
Incremental crawling
Re-crawls use ETag, Last-Modified and content hashing to skip unchanged pages, and an interrupted crawl resumes from a checkpoint.
Reports in seven formats
A health score and letter grade, with output as a self-contained HTML file, Markdown or console text for people, and LLM, JSON, XML or text for agents.
Cloud audits
Signed in, audits add headless-browser rendering for JavaScript sites, AI page analysis, technology detection, dead-link checks, scheduled runs and published reports.

Plans

Sitebulb

  • Lite$18

    per month, billed monthly

    Desktop, 1 user, 10,000 URLs per audit, 100+ hints, JavaScript crawling, crawl maps and GA, GSC and Sheets integration.

  • Pro$42

    per month, billed monthly

    Desktop price for 1 user; more users from $11 a month each. 500,000 URLs per audit, 300+ hints, scheduling, comparisons, PDF reports.

  • Sitebulb Cloud$125

    per month and up, billed monthly

    Browser-based cloud crawling for 2+ users, no project limits, recurring crawls and Data Studio integration.

squirrelscan

  • Free$0

    Unlimited local audits, 500 cloud credits a month, 500 pages per cloud audit and a weekly scheduled audit of one site. No card needed.

  • Pro$19

    per month, billed monthly

    3,000 credits a month (an audit costs 50 plus 2 per page), 2,000 pages per audit, daily audits of all sites and score history. $190 a year.

  • Team$29

    per seat / month, billed monthly

    Minimum 2 seats. 3,000 pooled credits per seat, 10,000 pages per audit, roles, shared projects and white-label reports. $290 per seat a year.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Custom contracts and invoiced billing for larger teams, with single sign-on on request.

Ways to pay less

Sitebulb

  • Annual discount

    Save 15% with yearly plans

    Paid yearly, Lite is $180 a year and Pro $425 for 1 user, with extra users at $115.60 a year; Sitebulb Cloud starts at $1,500 a year.

squirrelscan

  • Annual discount

    Two months free with annual billing

    Annual billing is 12 months for the price of 10: Pro is $190 a year and Team $290 per seat a year, with credits still arriving monthly.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Sitebulb or squirrelscan?

As of Oct 23, 2026, Sitebulb is cheaper to start with: $18 a month, against $19 a month for squirrelscan. Sitebulb starts at $18 per month, billed monthly, and squirrelscan starts at $19 per month, billed monthly.

Which has a free plan, Sitebulb or squirrelscan?

As of Oct 23, 2026, only squirrelscan has a free plan. Sitebulb does not, though it has a free trial.

Which platforms do Sitebulb and squirrelscan run on?

As of Oct 23, 2026, only squirrelscan lists a Linux app. Both list a web app and macOS and Windows apps. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade