Skip to content

Elastic Email alternatives · Email Sending

Open-source alternatives to Elastic Email

Elastic Email is not described as open source on its own site. 8 of the 50 other email sending services in this directory are open source, according to their own sites.

Elastic Email has a free plan. Paid plans start at $19 per month for 50,000 emails. All of them are free or have a free plan.

8 tools · Listings checked up to Nov 13, 2026 · Where the facts come from

How each one differs from Elastic Email

  1. useSend

    Open-source email sender built on Amazon SES

    • useSend starts at $10 per month, then pay as you go. Elastic Email starts at $19 per month for 50,000 emails.
    • useSend is open source and self-hostable, according to its own site.
    • Elastic Email also covers email verification.
  2. Plunk

    Open-source email platform for transactional and marketing mail

    • Plunk starts at $0.001 per email sent. Elastic Email starts at $19 per month for 50,000 emails.
    • Plunk is open source and self-hostable, according to its own site.
    • Plunk also covers workflow automation.
    • Elastic Email also covers email verification.
  3. Hyvor Relay

    Open-source email API you can self-host

    • Hyvor Relay starts at €10,000 per year and up (Enterprise License). Elastic Email starts at $19 per month for 50,000 emails.
    • Hyvor Relay is open source and self-hostable, according to its own site.
    • Elastic Email also covers email campaigns and email verification.
  4. Novu

    Open-source notification infrastructure for apps and agents

    • Novu starts at $30 per month for 30,000 workflow runs. Elastic Email starts at $19 per month for 50,000 emails.
    • Novu is open source, according to its own site.
    • Novu also covers workflow automation.
    • Elastic Email also covers email campaigns and email verification.
  5. Nodemailer

    Free Node.js library for sending email over SMTP and other transports

    • Nodemailer is free. Elastic Email starts at $19 per month for 50,000 emails.
    • Nodemailer is open source, according to its own site.
    • Elastic Email also covers email campaigns and email verification.
  6. KumoMTA

    Open-source mail server for high-volume, self-run email sending

    • KumoMTA starts at $5,000 per billion messages per year for Silver support. Elastic Email starts at $19 per month for 50,000 emails.
    • Only KumoMTA lists a Linux app.
    • Only Elastic Email lists a web app.
    • KumoMTA is open source and self-hostable, according to its own site.
  7. Forward Email

    Open-source email forwarding and hosting for custom domains

    • Forward Email starts at $3 per month for unlimited domains. Elastic Email starts at $19 per month for 50,000 emails.
    • Only Forward Email lists macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android apps.
    • Forward Email is open source and self-hostable, according to its own site.
    • Elastic Email also covers email campaigns, email verification and transactional email.
  8. FluentSMTP

    Free WordPress plugin for sending site email through your provider

    • FluentSMTP is free. Elastic Email starts at $19 per month for 50,000 emails.
    • FluentSMTP is open source, according to its own site.
    • FluentSMTP also covers reports.
    • Elastic Email also covers email campaigns and email verification.

Common questions

Is there an open-source alternative to Elastic Email?

Yes. useSend, Plunk, Hyvor Relay, Novu, Nodemailer, KumoMTA, Forward Email and FluentSMTP are open source, according to their own sites.

Is Elastic Email open source?

Elastic Email is not described as open source on its own site. The listing was checked on Oct 18, 2026 against the pages it cites.

When was this checked?

Each listing shows its own date. On this page they run from Oct 18, 2026 to Nov 13, 2026. Vendors change prices and plans without notice, so confirm on their site before you buy.

This page is built from the listings. A tool is here because its listing says so, and the order is how close each is to Elastic Email: the alternatives its listing names first, then the tools that share the most features with it.