Agiloft vs Gatekeeper (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Gatekeeper grades higher than Agiloft: 2.0 against 1.8 out of 4.0.
Checked Nov 13, 2026 · graded Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA
Gatekeeper grades higher on features. They get the same grade on value for money, the free plan, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Gatekeeper
Vendor and contract management with unlimited eSign licences
Which one is for you
Pick Agiloft if
- Fits if a large company wants contracts that match its own process
- Makes sense if you already pay for DocuSign or Adobe Sign
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want signing alone, since this is a full enterprise contract platform
- Watch out: no price is published, only a demo and quote
- Watch out: signing needs a DocuSign or Adobe Sign subscription, so you may pay twice
- Not for you if you want to try it first, because no trial is listed
Pick Gatekeeper if
- Fits if you manage many suppliers and their contracts together
- Makes sense if you want signing included for everyone on the team
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want signatures only, since it is a vendor and contract platform
- Watch out: no price is published, and plans are sized by third-party count
- Tight if you want SSO, SCIM or role-based access, which need Enterprise
- Not for you if you need the MCP connector without Enterprise Plus
How we grade them
| 1.8GPAAgiloftWeak | 2.0GPAGatekeeperFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price is published, and the pricing page leads to a demo and a quote, so it sits in the middle with no evidence either way. | CNo price is published. Plans are sized by third-party count and quoted after a demo, so it sits in the middle with no evidence either way. |
| Free plan and trial | FNo free plan or trial is listed on its pages or in the listing, so nothing is free. | FNo free plan or trial is listed on its pages or in the listing, so nothing is free. |
| Features | CAn eight-stage contract lifecycle, no-code configuration and contract AI. E-signature comes through integrations rather than built in. | BContract lifecycle, included eSign, vendor risk and compliance, AI agents and integrations. No gap in the contract job shows in the listing. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating on record, and an enterprise platform you configure takes setup. | CNo store rating on record, and vendors and contracts have to be loaded first. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with DocuSign, Adobe Sign, Salesforce, SAP, Oracle, NetSuite and Workday. | BWeb only, with NetSuite, Jira and AWS Marketplace listed. |
| Best for | configurable contract management for big companies | contracts and vendor risk in one platform |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Agiloft and Gatekeeper. How we grade
Where they differ
- Agiloft also covers templates.
At a glance
| Agiloft | Gatekeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Agiloft Inc. | Gatekeeper |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Nov 13, 2026 | Nov 13, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Agiloft
- No prices are published; the pricing page leads to a demo and a quote.
- Signing runs through integrations, so a separate e-signature subscription may be needed.
- It is a full enterprise CLM platform, which is more than a plain signing tool needs.
- The vendor lists a web platform only, with no separate desktop or mobile apps.
Gatekeeper
- No prices are published; Pro, Enterprise and Enterprise Plus plans are sized by third-party count and quoted after a demo.
- Pro covers up to 250 third parties, Enterprise up to 750, and Enterprise Plus more than 750.
- SSO, SCIM and role-based access need Enterprise, and the MCP connector needs Enterprise Plus.
- It is a vendor and contract platform, more than a team that only needs signatures requires.
Key features
Agiloft
- Eight-stage lifecycle
- The platform covers request and initiation, generation, review and negotiation, approvals, execution, and later stages, in one governed system.
- No-code configuration
- Workflows, approvals, data models and automations are set up without writing code, according to the vendor.
- E-signature integrations
- Signing is done through connected e-signature tools such as DocuSign and Adobe Sign, not a signing product of Agiloft's own.
- Astra contract intelligence
- Astra is the vendor's AI product for reviewing agreements, comparing clauses, flagging risks and tracking obligations.
- Integration Hub
- The site says 1,000+ pre-built connectors link contract data to CRM, ERP and sourcing systems without code.
Gatekeeper
- Contract lifecycle management
- Contracts, renewals and obligations live on a unified record with vendor due diligence, so each stage feeds the next.
- eSign included
- The plan comparison lists unlimited eSign licences and senders on every plan, including Pro.
- Vendor risk and compliance
- Vendor onboarding, risk and compliance checks and performance tracking sit alongside contracts.
- Gatekeeper AI agents
- AI agents handle administrative work such as intake and renewals, with people kept in control of decisions, per the vendor.
- Interconnect integrations
- Gatekeeper Interconnect connects to 1,700+ applications, including NetSuite and Jira, according to the integrations page.
Plans
Agiloft
Pricing could not be confirmed. See agiloft.com.
Gatekeeper
Pricing could not be confirmed. See gatekeeperhq.com.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Agiloft or Gatekeeper?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Agiloft has no price we could confirm, and Gatekeeper has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Agiloft or Gatekeeper?
As of Nov 13, 2026, neither Agiloft nor Gatekeeper has a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.