AI SEO Tracker vs LLMrefs (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, AI SEO Tracker and LLMrefs share a 2.2 GPA, neither has a free plan and their prices can't be set side by side, so the choice depends on whether you care more about value for money, where AI SEO Tracker grades higher, or the free plan, where LLMrefs does.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
They get the same grade on features, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
AI SEO Tracker
One-time AI visibility report with optional weekly tracking
LLMrefs
Keyword-based AI search visibility tracker with one flat plan
Which one is for you
Pick AI SEO Tracker if
- Fits if you want a one-off check of AI visibility without a subscription
- Works for teams that want their AI visibility data readable inside Claude Code over MCP
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you need daily tracking, as subscriptions rescan weekly
- Not for you if Claude or Grok answers matter, since they aren't scanned
- Tight if you track a lot on Basic, which stops at 250 answers a month with owner-only access
- Not for you if you want to try it first: there's no free plan or trial, only small free checkers
- Watch out: the maker's agency sells page writing and outreach separately, from $1,999 a month
Pick LLMrefs if
- Fits if you already track SEO keywords and want the same lists checked in AI answers
- Works for agencies, since projects and seats are unlimited on one plan
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you need daily data, as it refreshes about once a week per keyword
- Not for you if you need SSO, white-label reports or an enterprise tier, as none are listed
- Skip it if you need a price you can count on, as $79 is marked limited time only
- Watch out: no integrations are listed beyond the API and CSV export
How we grade them
| 2.2GPAAI SEO TrackerFair | 2.2GPALLMrefsFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | BThe $49 report, paid once, covers 7 days of daily scans on five engines and an action plan, which costs less than a month of a typical tracker here. Ongoing tracking is $79 a month with weekly rescans, which is ordinary. | C$79 a month for 500 prompts on every engine, with unlimited projects and seats. That's mid-range for this category, between $29 and $95. But the price is marked limited time only, with no end date or regular price given. |
| Free plan and trial | DNo free plan or trial. A one-question checker, a page inspector and keyword research are free with no account, but the report itself is $49. | CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial, and signing up needs no credit card. |
| Features | CRank tables per engine, rivals named instead, cited pages and Reddit threads, and an action plan. The gaps: no Claude or Grok, monthly plans rescan weekly rather than daily, and Basic caps at 250 answers a month. | CFan-out prompts built from your keywords, share of voice and position across ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI and DeepSeek, and cited sources in 50+ countries. The gap: data refreshes weekly, not daily. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. You give it your site and it finds competitors, but you still choose the questions and read rank tables across five engines. | CNo rating on record. Importing an SEO keyword list is a familiar start, but you still set up projects, countries and competitors before the rankings say much. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with an MCP server that lets Claude Code and other agents read projects, scans, sources and competitors. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app and no integrations on record. The one plan includes an API and CSV export. |
| Best for | a one-off AI visibility report | tracking AI visibility by keyword, not prompt |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: AI SEO Tracker and LLMrefs. How we grade
Where they differ
- AI SEO Tracker also covers rank tracking.
At a glance
| AI SEO Tracker | LLMrefs | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Free trial |
| Starts at | $49 one-time report; tracking from $79 per month | $79 per month for 500 prompts |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | 7-day free trial; signing up needs no credit card |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Stardrop GmbH | LLMrefs |
| Price read from | aiseotracker.com | llmrefs.com |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
AI SEO Tracker
- Claude and Grok are not scanned; the five engines are ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot and Google AI Overviews.
- Monthly plans rescan weekly, not daily; daily scans run only during the report's seven days.
- Basic is limited to 250 model responses a month and owner-only access.
- The maker's agency, MagicSpace, sells page writing and outreach separately from $1,999 a month.
LLMrefs
- There is one plan; the $79 price is labeled limited time only, with no end date or regular price given.
- Dashboard data refreshes at least once a week per keyword, not daily.
- The pricing page lists no enterprise tier, SSO or white-label options.
Key features
AI SEO Tracker
- Rank on each engine
- One table per question shows each brand's rank in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot and AI Overviews, with the full answer of each engine.
- Who AI names instead
- Lists the brands recommended for your questions with their average rank next to yours; competitors are found from your site.
- Cited pages
- Shows the lists and articles each engine reads before answering, as the pages worth getting into, plus Reddit threads AI cites.
- Prioritized action plan
- The report ends with what to fix first, written from the scan, and stays readable, printable and exportable after the scan week.
- MCP server for AI agents
- Agents such as Claude Code can read projects, scans, sources, prompts and competitors over MCP with OAuth; the only write is adding prompts.
- Free tools and leaderboards
- A one-question AI visibility checker, a page inspector, AI keyword research and monthly public leaderboards need no account.
LLMrefs
- Keyword-based tracking
- Import SEO keyword lists; LLMrefs generates fan-out prompts for each keyword from real AI conversations and aggregates the answers.
- Share of voice rankings
- Ranks brands against competitors per keyword by share of voice and average position, weighted across every prompt.
- Source and citation lists
- Shows and filters the URLs AI engines cite when answering about your products, to find content and outreach targets.
- Countries and languages
- Geo-targeted tracking in 50+ countries and 20+ languages, filterable by engine and country.
- Agency projects
- Unlimited projects and seats under one subscription, with client dashboards and keywords spread across projects.
- Free AI SEO tools
- An AI crawlability checker, a Reddit threads finder and an llms.txt generator come with the plan.
Plans
AI SEO Tracker
AI SEO report$49
one-time, for 7 days of daily scans of up to 50 prompts
One brand on five AI engines, competitor gaps, cited sources and an action plan, kept for good. No subscription.
Basic$79
per month for 50 prompts, rescanned weekly
250 model responses a month, one brand workspace, automatic rescans on 5 AI engines and owner-only access.
Pro$199
per month for 500 prompts, rescanned weekly
5,000 model responses a month, unlimited brands and projects, and teammates invited to shared projects.
LLMrefs
All in One$79
per month for 500 prompts
All AI engines, weekly reports, citations, 50+ countries, unlimited projects and users, CSV export and API. Marked limited time only.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, AI SEO Tracker or LLMrefs?
As of Oct 23, 2026, AI SEO Tracker starts at $49 one-time report; tracking from $79 per month, and LLMrefs starts at $79 per month for 500 prompts.
Which has a free plan, AI SEO Tracker or LLMrefs?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither AI SEO Tracker nor LLMrefs has a free plan. LLMrefs has a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.