Skip to content

Elicit vs Paper Digest (2026): which should you pick?

As of Nov 13, 2026, we pick Elicit: it is first in our ranking of AI research tools, and it grades higher too, 2.4 against 2.2.

Checked Nov 9, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 · graded Nov 9, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 by ToolGPA

Elicit grades higher on the free plan and features. Paper Digest grades higher on value for money. They get the same grade on ease of use and platforms.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

Elicit

AI research assistant for literature search and systematic reviews

Free plan · from $49/mo

Paper Digest

Cited literature reviews, deep research and daily paper digests

Free plan

Which one is for you

Pick Elicit if

  • Fits if you're running a systematic review and want the screening and data extraction automated
  • Works for students and casual readers, since free search, summaries and paper chat are unlimited

Look elsewhere if

  • Pricey if you're outside a university, with Pro at $49 a user a month billed yearly and $75 monthly
  • Skip it if you want real-time collaboration or extraction from figures on a budget, as both need Scale at $229 a user a month billed yearly, $375 monthly
  • Tight if your workload is lumpy, because monthly usage doesn't roll over and extra is billed in $100 steps
  • Watch out: the pricing page opens on industry rates, and the $11 academic Plus plan shows only once you switch
  • Too light for phone or desktop use, with a web app and Chrome extension only, and an integration list that stops at Zotero

Pick Paper Digest if

  • Fits if you want a cited literature review draft for a topic
  • Works for someone who wants a daily digest of new papers in their field

Look elsewhere if

  • Not for you if you want a price, since the pricing page showed placeholders only
  • Skip it if you want a desktop or phone app, as only the web is described
  • Watch out: free limits aren't stated, only that some features work without signing in
  • Watch out: the default literature review uses large language models for its prose

How we grade them

2.4GPAElicitFair2.2GPAPaper DigestFair
Value for money
DPro is $49 a user a month billed annually, $75 monthly, where paid plans in this category usually start around $12. Everything you'd come for sits up there: the review workflow, Routines, the API. Academic pricing only brings Pro to $39, and unused usage doesn't roll over.
CNo price could be read: the pricing URL showed a template table with placeholder values. With nothing to compare against the category's $10 middle, it sits at C.
Free plan and trial
BBasic costs nothing and gives you unlimited search over 138 million papers, unlimited summaries and unlimited chat with papers, plus Zotero import. One person could really live on that. The Research Agent and reports are capped on Basic, and the listing can't say by how much.
CThe homepage says some features can be tried without signing in and labels several digests free, but the limits aren't stated.
Features
BIt covers the whole job: search from a question across papers and 545,000 clinical trials, cited reports with tables and figures, screening and data extraction for a systematic review, a Zotero library, Routines and an API. Rivals here run systematic reviews too, so there's no trick that's Elicit's alone.
CLiterature reviews, deep research, a reader, daily digests and reference manager export. The default review uses large language models for the final prose, with a no-LLM version as a separate option.
Ease of use
CNo store rating on record, and this isn't a box you type into and walk away from: there are screening workflows, extraction columns and a monthly usage pool to watch. The pricing page doesn't help, opening on industry rates with the $11 academic plan hidden until you switch.
CNo store rating on record. Several separate tools sit on one site and you choose between them.
Platforms and integrations
BA web app plus a Chrome extension that fetches full texts through your institution's journal access, and it takes in Zotero, PDFs and .ris or .bib files. The integration list stops at Zotero though, the API starts at Pro, and there's no phone or desktop app.
BWeb only, with export to Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and Obsidian.
Best forsystematic reviews and evidence tablescited literature reviews and daily paper digests

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Elicit and Paper Digest. How we grade

Where they differ

  • Elicit also covers AI search and AI agents.
  • Paper Digest also covers chat assistant and documents.
In commonWebResearchCitations

At a glance

ElicitPaper Digest
PricingFree planFree plan
Starts at$49 per user / month, billed annually ($11 on academic pricing)Not published
Free planBasic plan: unlimited search over 138 million papers, unlimited paper summaries and chat with papers, Zotero import, and limited Research Agent and report usage.None
Free trialNone listedNone listed
Web
Browser extension
Made byElicit Research, PBCPaper Digest
Price read fromelicit.comNot confirmed
CheckedNov 9, 2026Nov 12, 2026

Worth knowing

Elicit

  • The pricing page defaults to industry rates; the $11 Plus plan appears only when Academic is selected.
  • The systematic review workflow, Routines and API access start at the Pro plan.
  • Monthly usage does not roll over. Extra usage on Pro and Scale is billed in $100 increments, up to a limit you set.
  • Real-time collaboration, extraction from figures and the admin panel need Scale or Enterprise.

Paper Digest

  • No pricing page could be read: the site's pricing URL shows a template table with placeholder values, so no plans or prices are recorded.
  • The homepage says some features can be tried without signing in and labels several daily digests free, but the limits are not stated.
  • The default literature review uses large language models for the final prose; the no-LLM version is a separate option.
  • Only a web version is described; no desktop or mobile app is listed.

Key features

Elicit

Research Agent
Gathers evidence from scientific databases, journals, public data sources and uploaded documents, then produces cited reports, tables, figures and slides.
Paper and clinical trial search
Semantic search over more than 138 million papers from Semantic Scholar, PubMed and OpenAlex, plus about 545,000 clinical trials, so a query does not depend on exact keywords.
Research reports
Generates research briefs through a process modeled on systematic reviews. You can change which papers and what information a report covers.
Systematic review workflow
Automates screening and data extraction, with a Pro workflow that can screen 5,000 papers. A Chrome extension fetches full texts through your institution's journal access.
Library and Zotero import
Stores sources in collections with tags so they can be reused across projects, and takes in papers from Zotero, PDFs, and .ris or .bib files.
Routines and API
Routines rerun Research Agent work to pick up new evidence, and an API covers search, reports and systematic reviews. Both start at the Pro plan.

Paper Digest

Literature review
Takes a topic and writes a review from the most influential papers, patents, grants and trials around it, with a citation for each sentence. An option avoids large language models.
Deep research reports
Gathers evidence from the index and other sources into a cited report, with a claim-verification mode that collects evidence for and against an argument.
Academic reader
Upload a PDF or text file, or paste a link, and ask for a summary, the method, the results or any free-form question, answered beside the document.
Daily and conference digests
Follows new papers by topic, venue or keyword, including arXiv, bioRxiv, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov feeds, and sends daily updates.
Reference manager export
Reviews and reports can be exported as RIS or Markdown for Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and Obsidian.
Research library
Members can save documents with notes, tags and reading status, and publish a reading list or researcher profile.

Plans

Elicit

  • Basic$0

    Unlimited paper search, summaries and chat with papers, Zotero import, and limited Research Agent and report usage.

  • Pro$49

    per user / month, billed annually ($588); $75 billed monthly

    Standard usage, a systematic review workflow that screens 5,000 papers, 20 table columns at a time, Routines and API access.

  • Scale$229

    per user / month, billed annually ($2,748); $375 billed monthly

    5x the usage of Pro, real-time collaboration, extraction from figures, 30 table columns at a time and an admin panel with seat management.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Custom usage, SSO and SAML, screening of 40,000 papers, 40 extraction columns, custom data sources and unlimited API access.

Paper Digest

Pricing could not be confirmed. See paperdigest.org.

Ways to pay less

Elicit

  • Annual discount

    Save 35% to 39% with annual billing

    On industry pricing, Pro is $49 a month billed annually against $75 billed monthly, and Scale is $229 against $375. The pricing page labels these as savings of 35% and 39%.

  • Education

    Academic pricing from $11 per user / month

    Choosing Academic on the pricing page shows Plus at $11, Pro at $39 and Scale at $89 per user / month, billed annually, or $19, $69 and $149 billed monthly.

  • Nonprofit

    Nonprofits can use the academic plans

    Elicit has no separate nonprofit discount, but its help center says nonprofits can subscribe to the academic plans, its lowest pricing tier.

Paper Digest

No public discounts listed.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Elicit or Paper Digest?

As of Nov 12, 2026, Elicit starts at $49 per user / month, billed annually ($11 on academic pricing), and Paper Digest has no price we could confirm.

Which has a free plan, Elicit or Paper Digest?

As of Nov 12, 2026, only Elicit has a free plan. Paper Digest does not.

Which platforms do Elicit and Paper Digest run on?

As of Nov 12, 2026, only Elicit lists a browser extension. Both list a web app. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade