Paper Digest vs Paperguide (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Paperguide grades higher than Paper Digest: 2.6 against 2.2 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 5, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 · graded Oct 10, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 by ToolGPA
Paperguide grades higher on features. They get the same grade on value for money, the free plan, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Paper Digest
Cited literature reviews, deep research and daily paper digests
Paperguide
AI research platform for literature and systematic reviews
Which one is for you
Pick Paper Digest if
- Fits if you want a cited literature review draft for a topic
- Works for someone who wants a daily digest of new papers in their field
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a price, since the pricing page showed placeholders only
- Skip it if you want a desktop or phone app, as only the web is described
- Watch out: free limits aren't stated, only that some features work without signing in
- Watch out: the default literature review uses large language models for its prose
Pick Paperguide if
- Fits if your team runs systematic reviews and needs every screening decision documented
- Works for students and academics, who get 30% off with a university email
Look elsewhere if
- Tight if you're staying free, with 20 AI searches and 2,000 credits a month, and no systematic reviews or shared workspaces
- Pricey if you need dual-reviewer screening, which sits on Evidence at $89 a seat a month billed annually
- Watch out: every AI feature draws on one monthly credit pool, 12,500 on Plus and 50,000 on Pro
- Skip it if you were counting on image and table extraction, as that's still marked coming soon
- Not for you if you want a phone or desktop app, as only a web app and browser extension are listed
How we grade them
| 2.2GPAPaper DigestFair | 2.6GPAPaperguideGood | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price could be read: the pricing URL showed a template table with placeholder values. With nothing to compare against the category's $10 middle, it sits at C. | CPlus is $12 a seat a month billed annually, or $19 monthly, which is the middle of this category exactly. It does carry systematic reviews of up to 1,000 papers, unlimited AI searches and 12,500 credits a month, and a university email takes 30% off. Dual-reviewer screening is another matter: Evidence, at $89. |
| Free plan and trial | CThe homepage says some features can be tried without signing in and labels several digests free, but the limits aren't stated. | CFree gives you 2,000 AI credits and 20 AI searches a month, 500 MB of reference storage and extraction tables of up to 10 papers and 5 columns. Enough to learn the tool, not to run a project on: there are no systematic reviews and no shared workspaces. |
| Features | CLiterature reviews, deep research, a reader, daily digests and reference manager export. The default review uses large language models for the final prose, with a no-LLM version as a separate option. | ATwo parts rivals like Elicit and Consensus don't list: screening that ends in a PRISMA diagram with dual-reviewer checking, and a full reference manager with 1,000-plus citation styles. Then AI search across 200 million papers, extraction tables, an agent and a writer. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating on record. Several separate tools sit on one site and you choose between them. | CNo store rating on record, and the work is front-loaded: a protocol to define for screening, columns to set up for extraction, and one monthly credit pool that every AI feature draws on. It does import a Zotero or Mendeley library, so your references don't start from nothing. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with export to Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and Obsidian. | BA web app with a browser extension, plus a Search API at 10 requests a month on Free and 500 on Pro. It imports from Zotero and Mendeley and connects to Claude and ChatGPT. No phone or desktop app is listed, so that API is what earns the B. |
| Best for | cited literature reviews and daily paper digests | search, references and reviews in one workspace |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Paper Digest and Paperguide. How we grade
Where they differ
- Paper Digest also covers documents.
- Paperguide also covers AI search, AI agents and long-form writing.
At a glance
| Paper Digest | Paperguide | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan | Free plan |
| Starts at | Not published | $12 per seat / month, billed annually ($8 with the academic discount) |
| Free plan | None | 2,000 AI credits and 20 AI searches a month, 500 MB of reference storage, extraction tables of up to 10 papers and 5 columns, and 10 Search API requests a month. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Browser extension | ||
| Made by | Paper Digest | Paperguide |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | paperguide.ai |
| Checked | Nov 12, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Paper Digest
- No pricing page could be read: the site's pricing URL shows a template table with placeholder values, so no plans or prices are recorded.
- The homepage says some features can be tried without signing in and labels several daily digests free, but the limits are not stated.
- The default literature review uses large language models for the final prose; the no-LLM version is a separate option.
- Only a web version is described; no desktop or mobile app is listed.
Paperguide
- The Free plan has no systematic reviews or shared workspaces and is limited to 20 AI searches and 2,000 AI credits a month.
- AI features draw on a monthly credit pool: 12,500 on Plus, 50,000 on Pro and 150,000 on Evidence.
- Dual-reviewer screening for systematic reviews needs the Evidence plan, at $89 per seat / month billed annually.
- Image and table extraction is marked as coming soon on the pricing page.
Key features
Paper Digest
- Literature review
- Takes a topic and writes a review from the most influential papers, patents, grants and trials around it, with a citation for each sentence. An option avoids large language models.
- Deep research reports
- Gathers evidence from the index and other sources into a cited report, with a claim-verification mode that collects evidence for and against an argument.
- Academic reader
- Upload a PDF or text file, or paste a link, and ask for a summary, the method, the results or any free-form question, answered beside the document.
- Daily and conference digests
- Follows new papers by topic, venue or keyword, including arXiv, bioRxiv, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov feeds, and sends daily updates.
- Reference manager export
- Reviews and reports can be exported as RIS or Markdown for Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote and Obsidian.
- Research library
- Members can save documents with notes, tags and reading status, and publish a reading list or researcher profile.
Paperguide
- AI Search
- Ask a research question in plain language and get a synthesized answer drawn from more than 200 million papers, with each claim linked to its source.
- Systematic reviews
- Screens papers against a predefined protocol with cited evidence for each criterion, then produces verified extraction tables, a report and a PRISMA diagram. Dual-reviewer screening is on the Evidence plan.
- Reference manager
- Imports from Zotero or Mendeley, or by DOI, URL, PDF, BibTeX or RIS, fetches metadata and open-access PDFs, and formats citations in more than 1,000 styles.
- Extract Data
- You define the columns and the AI fills them across the selected papers, with every value linked to the statement it came from. Tables export to CSV or Excel.
- Research Agent
- Investigates a topic across the paper database and your library, answers questions about one or several PDFs, and can generate a literature review of up to 50 papers.
- AI Writer
- Drafts and edits documents with citations from your library and the paper database, and exports them as Word, PDF or LaTeX files.
Plans
Paper Digest
Pricing could not be confirmed. See paperdigest.org.
Paperguide
Free$0
2,000 AI credits and 20 AI searches a month, 500 MB of reference storage, and extraction tables of up to 10 papers and 5 columns.
Plus$12
per seat / month, billed annually ($144); $19 billed monthly
12,500 AI credits a month, systematic reviews of up to 1,000 papers, unlimited AI searches and reference storage, and shared workspaces.
Pro$29
per seat / month, billed annually ($348); $49 billed monthly
50,000 AI credits a month, systematic reviews of up to 5,000 papers and 500 Search API requests a month.
Evidence$89
per seat / month, billed annually ($1,068); $149 billed monthly
150,000 AI credits a month, PRISMA-grade dual-reviewer screening, a dedicated support channel and 1,500 Search API requests a month.
EnterpriseCustom
Custom AI credits, systematic reviews of up to 20,000 papers, dual-reviewer screening and a dedicated support channel.
Ways to pay less
Paper Digest
No public discounts listed.
Paperguide
- Annual discount
Save up to 41% with yearly billing
Billed yearly, Plus is $12 a seat per month against $19 billed monthly, Pro is $29 against $49 and Evidence is $89 against $149. The pricing page labels the saving as 41%.
- Education
30% academic discount with a university email
Verifying a university email takes 30% off: Plus becomes $8, Pro $20 and Evidence $62 per seat / month billed yearly, or $13, $34 and $104 billed monthly.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Paper Digest or Paperguide?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Paper Digest has no price we could confirm, and Paperguide starts at $12 per seat / month, billed annually ($8 with the academic discount).
Which has a free plan, Paper Digest or Paperguide?
As of Nov 12, 2026, only Paperguide has a free plan. Paper Digest does not.
Which platforms do Paper Digest and Paperguide run on?
As of Nov 12, 2026, only Paperguide lists a browser extension. Both list a web app. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.