Harver vs Humanly (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Humanly grades higher than Harver: 2.0 against 1.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Nov 12, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 · graded Nov 12, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA
Humanly grades higher on features and platforms. They get the same grade on value for money, the free plan and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Humanly
AI recruiter, interviewer and ATS for hourly and high-volume hiring
Paid
Which one is for you
Pick Harver if
- Fits if you fill many similar roles and want to screen people before interviews
- Works for retail and contact-centre employers
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a full applicant tracker, as it centres on assessments
- Skip it if you want a price, as the pricing page returns a 404
- Watch out: plan details and limits are unconfirmed
- Watch out: video interviewing is a separate product
Pick Humanly if
- Fits if you hire hourly staff in restaurants, retail or healthcare and applicants pile up
- Works for small recruiting teams who want first contact and scheduling out of office hours
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want a price before talking to anyone, because there's no pricing page, only a demo
- Not for you if you recruit for professional or executive roles, since it's built for click-to-apply volume
- Watch out: the headline results, such as 8x faster time-to-hire, are the vendor's own numbers
- Tight if you want to try before buying: no free plan or trial is listed
How we grade them
| 1.6GPAHarverWeak | 2.0GPAHumanlyFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price is published, so it sits at the ordinary grade until the vendor says. | CNo price is published, so we can't set it against the $74 to $149 a month this category charges. That leaves it at C. |
| Free plan and trial | FNo free plan and no trial. The call to action is Request a Demo. | FNo free plan and no trial is listed; the site routes you to a demo. A demo request isn't a trial. |
| Features | CAssessments, game-based tests, video interviewing and reference checking, some from partners. It is a screening toolkit rather than a full applicant tracker. | BAI recruiter, AI interviewer, ATS, notetaker and talent CRM, with scoring and scheduling workflows. The listing names no gap in the core job of high-volume screening. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. Assessments have to be chosen and set up for each role. | CNo store rating on record, and the listing shows workflows to configure and an ATS or HCM to connect. That puts it at C. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only and no integrations listed on the pages read. | BWeb product with a partners page naming Greenhouse, iCIMS, Lever, JazzHR, Taleo, Workday and SAP. No desktop or phone app is listed, so it stops at B. |
| Best for | pre-hire assessments for volume hiring | AI screening and interviews for hourly hiring |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Harver and Humanly. How we grade
Where they differ
- Harver also covers skills tests.
- Humanly also covers transcription, workflow automation, AI agents, applicant tracking and sMS marketing.
In commonWebAI features
At a glance
| Harver | Humanly | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Harver B.V. | Humanly.io |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Nov 12, 2026 | Nov 13, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Harver
- The /pricing page returned a 404, so no prices were found; contact the vendor for a quote.
- Pages read were navigation only, so plan details and limits are unconfirmed.
Humanly
- No pricing page exists; the site routes buyers to a demo.
- It is built for hourly and high-volume hiring, so it suits professional or executive search less.
- The vendor's headline results (such as 8x faster time-to-hire) are its own figures, not independent ones.
Key features
Harver
- Harver for Volume Hiring
- Hiring product aimed at high-volume roles, with industry pages for retail, BPO and contact centers and others.
- Harver Assess
- Assessments including personality questionnaires, cognitive ability tests, situational judgment tests and a spoken language assessment.
- Video interviewing
- Harver for Video Interview is a separate product.
- Game-based assessments
- pymetrics provides game-based assessments.
- Reference checking
- Checkster provides reference checking.
Humanly
- AI Recruiter
- Engages, screens and schedules applicants around the clock across SMS, email and chat, and re-engages past applicants.
- AI Interviewer
- Runs structured video, voice and asynchronous interviews on the candidate's schedule and returns ranked candidates with transcripts and reasoning.
- Applicant tracking system
- Manages candidates, pipelines and hiring workflows for click-to-apply, high-volume roles.
- AI Notetaker and talent CRM
- A notetaker for interviews and a talent CRM sit beside the recruiter and interviewer products.
- Configurable workflows
- Scoring, evaluation and scheduling run on workflows the employer sets, so qualified candidates get invites automatically.
- ATS and HCM connections
- Its partners page lists Greenhouse, iCIMS, Lever, JazzHR, Taleo, Workday and SAP among the systems it connects to.
Plans
Harver
Pricing could not be confirmed. See harver.com.
Humanly
Pricing could not be confirmed. See humanly.io.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Harver or Humanly?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Harver has no price we could confirm, and Humanly has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Harver or Humanly?
As of Nov 13, 2026, neither Harver nor Humanly has a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.