Hebbia vs Rogo (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Hebbia grades higher than Rogo: 1.8 against 1.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Nov 12, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 · graded Nov 12, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA
Hebbia grades higher on platforms. They get the same grade on value for money, the free plan, features and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Which one is for you
Pick Hebbia if
- Fits if you work in banking, private equity or credit and review big document sets
- Works for law firms pulling terms out of many contracts at once
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a published price, as only a demo request is offered
- Skip it if you are an individual or small team, since it is aimed at institutional finance and legal work
- Watch out: connectors such as FactSet or PitchBook depend on a licence you pay for separately
- Not for you if you want a free try, because none is offered
Pick Rogo if
- Fits if you work at an investment bank or investment firm
- Works for finance teams that want agents trained for deals and data rooms
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want self-serve signup, as access starts with a demo
- Skip it if you need a published price, because none exists
- Not for you if you are a small shop, since it is built for large finance firms
- Watch out: usage is tracked in credits inside the product, and the SOC 2 and ISO claims are the vendor's own
How we grade them
| 1.8GPAHebbiaWeak | 1.6GPARogoWeak | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price is published, only a demo request, so it sits at the middle of the category by default. | CNo price is published; access starts with a demo request. |
| Free plan and trial | FNo free plan and no trial. You request a demo. | FNo free plan and no trial on record, and access starts with a demo request. |
| Features | CA deal-team agent, a document grid, API access and connectors to FactSet, PitchBook, Datasite and Box. The listing notes several connectors need your own data licence. | CA library of finance agents and a builder, project workspaces and governance controls. It is aimed at finance firms only. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating on record, and it has to be connected to your data rooms and licences before it does anything. | CNo rating on record. Rollout includes embedded former bankers, which suggests real setup work. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb, with a long list of finance and storage connectors, plus an API for building your own front ends. | CWeb platform only, with no integrations named on the pages read. |
| Best for | finance and legal teams reading large piles of documents | AI agents for investment banks |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Hebbia and Rogo. How we grade
Where they differ
- Hebbia also covers AI search and documents.
- Rogo also covers meeting notes.
At a glance
| Hebbia | Rogo | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Hebbia | Rogo |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Nov 12, 2026 | Nov 13, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Hebbia
- No prices are published; the site only offers a demo request.
- It is built for institutional finance and legal work, not for individuals or small teams without those data sources.
- Many data connectors, such as FactSet or PitchBook, depend on the firm having its own license for that data.
Rogo
- No prices, plans or trial terms are published; access starts with a demo request.
- The pricing page address returns not found, and usage is tracked in credits inside the product.
- Rollout includes embedded former bankers and investors, which the vendor calls Forward Deployed Bankers.
- The site lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, CCPA and EU AI Act, as the vendor's claims.
Key features
Hebbia
- Max
- An agent that takes on deal-team tasks such as modeling, screening a target list, spreading comps and recapping earnings calls from the firm's own data.
- Matrix
- A grid where rows are companies or documents and columns are questions, so one analysis runs across many sources at once.
- Financial and filings data
- Integrations listed include FactSet, S&P Global, PitchBook, Fitch Solutions, Octus and Moody's, alongside SEC filings and earnings transcripts.
- Data room and file connections
- Connectors are listed for Datasite, SharePoint, OneDrive, Box, Dropbox and Snowflake.
- API access
- The platform page shows firms building their own tools on Hebbia's API, including white-labeled front ends.
- Security controls
- The vendor says customer data is never used to train models, is siloed per customer, and can be processed regionally in the US or EU or on a dedicated tenant.
Rogo
- Agent library and builder
- Hundreds of agents made by finance practitioners cover first-pass analysis and monitoring, and new agents can learn a firm's templates and data sources.
- Proactive agents
- Always-on agents react to breaking news, data room files, research updates, emails, transactions and earnings.
- Intelligence and Projects
- Intelligence captures a firm's people, deals and expertise for reuse, and Projects ingests data rooms and works through deal requests alongside the deal team.
- Watchtower governance
- Controls models, permissions and retention, and includes a Credit Center for budgets and a Model Broker that routes tasks to different models.
- Notes
- A meeting notetaker that turns calls into reusable firm context, described as compliant by the vendor.
Plans
Hebbia
Pricing could not be confirmed. See hebbia.com.
Rogo
Pricing could not be confirmed. See rogo.com.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Hebbia or Rogo?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Hebbia has no price we could confirm, and Rogo has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Hebbia or Rogo?
As of Nov 13, 2026, neither Hebbia nor Rogo has a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.