Litify vs TrialWorks (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Litify grades higher than TrialWorks: 1.8 against 1.4 out of 4.0.
Checked Nov 12, 2026 · graded Nov 12, 2026 by ToolGPA
Litify grades higher on features and platforms. They get the same grade on value for money, the free plan and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Litify
Salesforce-based legal platform for case, intake and matter management
TrialWorks
Legacy case management for trial and personal injury firms
Which one is for you
Pick Litify if
- Fits if you run a high-volume firm or an enterprise legal team already on Salesforce
- Works for firms that want intake, billing and reporting on one platform
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you are a solo lawyer, since the vendor speaks to large firms and legal teams
- Not for you if you need a price to plan with, as none is published
- Skip it if you want to try it yourself, because only a demo is offered
- Watch out: the platform is built on Salesforce, and its log-in goes there
- Watch out: only Salesforce and Chrome are listed as integrations
Pick TrialWorks if
- Fits if your firm already runs TrialWorks and wants to keep going
- Works for personal injury shops that need mass tort and workers' comp modules
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you use a Mac or want a cloud tool, as it's a Windows program
- Not for you if you want a price, trial or feature page, none of which the public site has
- Watch out: Assembly Software describes Neos as the product built on TrialWorks, so new buyers may be sent there
- Watch out: hosting is arranged through a form on the support site, not self-service
How we grade them
| 1.8GPALitifyWeak | 1.4GPATrialWorksWeak | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price is published and pricing is recorded as unverified, which puts it in the middle. | CNo price is published; the vendor sells through consultations. Nothing on record to set against the $59 middle of law-practice tools. |
| Free plan and trial | FNo free plan, no trial and no self-serve sign-up; the page offers a demo. | FNo free plan and no trial on record anywhere in the listing. |
| Features | BIntake, matters, documents, time and billing, reporting and AI agents cover the job, with no gap named in the listing. | CDocketing, mass tort cases, contacts, templates, a workers' comp module and e-signature. The public site shows no feature list to compare with newer cloud tools. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating is on record, and a Salesforce-based platform needs configuring and a guided rollout. | CNo store rating on record. It installs with Microsoft Access runtime and .NET components, and hosting is set up through a form. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only, with Salesforce and a Chrome extension as the listed integrations. | DOne operating system, Windows. Four integrations listed. |
| Best for | large firms and legal teams that run on Salesforce | existing TrialWorks firms |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Litify and TrialWorks. How we grade
Where they differ
- Litify also covers workflow automation, time tracking, AI agents and reports.
- TrialWorks also covers calendar and documents.
At a glance
| Litify | TrialWorks | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Windows | ||
| Made by | Litify, LLC | Assembly Software |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Nov 12, 2026 | Nov 12, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Litify
- No prices are published; the vendor sells through a demo request, and pricing here is recorded as unverified.
- The platform is built on Salesforce, and the log-in button on the site goes to Salesforce.
- The vendor describes its solutions for high-volume firms and enterprise legal teams; solo-practice use is not addressed.
- No free trial or self-serve sign-up is offered on the pages we read.
TrialWorks
- No pricing is published; Assembly Software describes Neos as the product built on TrialWorks and sells it through consultations.
- The install notes mention Microsoft Access runtime and .NET components, so it appears to be a Windows program; the vendor lists no other platforms.
- The public site is a support hub, so there is no feature or integration page to compare against newer cloud tools.
- Hosting is arranged through a hosting setup form on the support site rather than self-service.
Key features
Litify
- Intake management
- The vendor describes call and voicemail capture, AI-guided questionnaires and predictive lead scoring that lead into a signed case.
- Matter and document management
- Matters, client data and documents live in one platform, with AI document generation and PDF editing listed by the vendor.
- Time and billing
- Timekeeping and billing that follows client guidelines, plus a separate spend management area for expense tracking, budgets and invoice review.
- Reporting and analytics
- A no-code reporting engine that filters firm data into dashboards and KPIs.
- Litify ACE agents
- ACE 2.0 is the vendor's AI assistant. It runs multi-step workflows across matters, answers questions about the caseload and has a Chrome extension and voice-to-text.
- Practice-area solutions
- Packaged setups for personal injury, insurance defense, immigration and corporate legal departments, among 15+ practice areas the vendor mentions.
TrialWorks
- Docketing
- A docket tab tracks deadlines and court dates for each case, with a training guide on the support site.
- Mass tort cases
- The support site documents a way to manage many plaintiffs in a mass tort, plus tabs for settlements and negotiations on each case.
- Contacts and call log
- Contact management with an import from Outlook, a call log and calls manager, and a mailing wizard for letters.
- Document templates and search
- Template training and a document search tool called TWSearch are part of the documented workflow, along with FileIT for filing documents.
- Workers' compensation module
- A separate module for workers' compensation cases is documented on the support site, with its own training guide.
- Messaging and e-signature
- Guides cover SMS messaging, DocuSign, Stamps.com postage and service on an attorney by email from inside the program.
Plans
Litify
Pricing could not be confirmed. See litify.com.
TrialWorks
Pricing could not be confirmed. See support.trialworks.com.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Litify or TrialWorks?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Litify has no price we could confirm, and TrialWorks has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Litify or TrialWorks?
As of Nov 12, 2026, neither Litify nor TrialWorks has a free plan.
Which platforms do Litify and TrialWorks run on?
As of Nov 12, 2026, only Litify lists a web app and only TrialWorks lists a Windows app. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.