Lumar vs Oncrawl (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Lumar and Oncrawl share a 2.0 GPA, neither has a free plan and their prices can't be set side by side, so the choice depends on which features you need.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
They get the same grade on all five counts.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Which one is for you
Pick Lumar if
- Fits if your site has hundreds of thousands of pages and an enterprise budget
- Makes sense if you want SEO checks to block a release in your CI/CD pipeline
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want to see a price before talking to sales, as it's quote-only
- Skip it if you want to try it first, since there's no free plan or trial on record
- Tight if you crawl a lot, as active projects and URLs per billing period are capped by contract
- Watch out: SEO and GEO professional services are a separate monthly contract
Pick Oncrawl if
- Fits if you run an e-commerce, media or listing site with millions of pages
- Works for teams that want crawl data and server logs read together
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a price before a demo, as none is published
- Skip it if you want to try it first, since the site offers no free plan or trial
- Tight if you render JavaScript or audit Core Web Vitals, at 3 or 5 tokens a URL against a monthly quota
- Watch out: deleted crawls still use their tokens, and advanced settings need a verified domain
How we grade them
| 2.0GPALumarFair | 2.0GPAOncrawlFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price is published. Lumar's pricing page is a quote form, so you only find out what it costs on a sales call, with packages built from the apps and metrics you pick. With no figure to compare, it sits at the ordinary grade. | CNo price is published. Plans are sold after a demo, so you only learn the cost on a sales call. Each plan carries a monthly crawl quota in tokens, and fetched URLs still use tokens even if you delete the crawl. |
| Free plan and trial | FNothing free on record: the site mentions no free plan and no trial. Access starts with a demo or a quote. | FNothing free on record: no free plan, and the site offers no free trial. You start with a demo. |
| Features | BCrawls up to 450 URLs a second, with 350+ reports on technical SEO, AI search readiness, speed and WCAG accessibility. Monitor follows many domains, and Protect tests new code in GitHub, Jenkins, CircleCI or Azure DevOps. Nothing in the listing shows a gap in the core job. | BA JavaScript crawler with custom extraction and crawl comparison, unsampled log analysis from Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud or Azure, AI Search and Content Lenses, and Search Console, GA4 and Majestic data side by side. The listing shows no gap in the core job. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. It's four apps on one crawler, with projects, crawl schedules, speed limits and custom extractions to set up, and access goes through a demo first. | CNo rating on record. There are logs to connect, tokens to budget (1 per URL, 3 with JavaScript, 5 with Core Web Vitals) and a domain to verify before the advanced crawl settings open up. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. It links to Search Console, Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, Looker Studio, GitHub, Splunk, Slack and Zapier, and has a public API. | BWeb only. It connects to Search Console, Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, Piano, Majestic, Cloudflare, Looker Studio and Dataiku, with a REST API, its own query language and an MCP server. |
| Best for | crawling very large sites before each release | crawl and log analysis on large sites |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Lumar and Oncrawl. How we grade
Where they differ
- Lumar also covers page speed.
- Oncrawl also covers internal linking and log file analysis.
In commonWebPublic APISite auditDashboardsAI search visibility
At a glance
| Lumar | Oncrawl | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Lumar | Oncrawl |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Lumar
- No prices are published: the pricing page is a quote form, and packages are built from the apps and metrics a team picks.
- Accounts have limits on active projects and on URLs crawled per billing period, set in each contract.
- No free plan or free trial is mentioned on the site; access starts with a demo or a quote.
- SEO and GEO professional services are sold as a separate monthly contract.
Oncrawl
- No prices are published; plans are sold after a demo, and no free trial is offered on the site.
- Each plan has a monthly crawl quota in tokens: 1 per URL crawled, 3 with JavaScript rendering, 5 with Core Web Vitals or accessibility audits.
- URLs fetched still use tokens even if the crawl is deleted afterwards.
- Advanced crawl settings need the domain to be verified as yours.
Key features
Lumar
- Cloud crawler
- Crawls run in the cloud at up to 450 URLs a second, or 350 rendered, with schedules, speed limits and a safeguard that pauses a crawl when failures pass a set rate.
- Analyze
- Lumar says Analyze has 350+ built-in reports on technical SEO, AI search readiness, site speed and accessibility, plus custom extractions from page HTML.
- Monitor
- Follows key metrics across several domains, site sections or country sites on shared dashboards, with alerts when new issues appear.
- Protect
- Runs automated SEO, speed and accessibility tests on new code, and can stop a build in GitHub, Jenkins, CircleCI or Azure DevOps when a test fails.
- GEO and AI visibility
- Reports on what may keep pages out of AI search answers and tracks brand mentions and sentiment on AI platforms, with AI-written suggestions.
- Accessibility and speed
- Tests pages against WCAG 2.2 levels A to AAA, and runs Lighthouse reports at scale alongside origin-level Chrome UX Report data.
Oncrawl
- Crawler
- Crawls millions of URLs with JavaScript rendering, custom extraction, scheduled crawls, crawl-over-crawl comparison and alerts on regressions.
- Log Analyzer
- Ingests server logs from Cloudflare, AWS, Google Cloud, Azure or uploaded files, unsampled, to show how search and AI bots crawl each page.
- AI Search Lens
- Uses log data to count visits from the AI user bots of ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Mistral and Gemini, and links them to depth, speed and other crawl metrics.
- Content Lens
- Uses AI to assess the quality and SEO readiness of content across a whole site, with prioritized recommendations.
- Ranking and traffic data
- Connects Search Console, GA4, Adobe Analytics, Piano and Majestic, and keeps Search Console history beyond Google's own retention limit.
- API, OQL and MCP
- A REST API and the Oncrawl Query Language export data and trigger crawls; an MCP server lets ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor query it.
Plans
Lumar
Pricing could not be confirmed. See lumar.io.
Oncrawl
Pricing could not be confirmed. See oncrawl.com.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Lumar or Oncrawl?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Lumar has no price we could confirm, and Oncrawl has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Lumar or Oncrawl?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Lumar nor Oncrawl has a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.