Audisto vs Lumar (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Lumar grades higher than Audisto: 2.0 against 1.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Lumar grades higher on value for money and features. They get the same grade on the free plan, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Audisto
Cloud crawler and automated SEO monitoring priced by pages crawled
Which one is for you
Pick Audisto if
- Fits if you audit large or multilingual sites and rerun crawls often
- Works for developers who want automated tests that catch SEO regressions
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you're buying as a private person, as it sells to businesses only
- Skip it if you want to try it first, since there's no trial or free plan
- Pricey if your site is big, at €659 a month for 1 million pages and €5,650 at 20 million
- Watch out: contracts renew monthly, and you must cancel by the 13th or the next invoice stands
- Tight if you want Search Console or log data beside the crawl, as no such connections are listed
Pick Lumar if
- Fits if your site has hundreds of thousands of pages and an enterprise budget
- Makes sense if you want SEO checks to block a release in your CI/CD pipeline
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want to see a price before talking to sales, as it's quote-only
- Skip it if you want to try it first, since there's no free plan or trial on record
- Tight if you crawl a lot, as active projects and URLs per billing period are capped by contract
- Watch out: SEO and GEO professional services are a separate monthly contract
How we grade them
| 1.6GPAAudistoWeak | 2.0GPALumarFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | DThe Crawler plan is €99 a month before VAT, about $115, for 10,000 HTML pages per crawl. That's in this category's dearest tenth, which starts at $99. Crawls are unlimited, but the price follows page count: €659 a month at 1 million pages. Monitoring starts at €199. | CNo price is published. Lumar's pricing page is a quote form, so you only find out what it costs on a sales call, with packages built from the apps and metrics you pick. With no figure to compare, it sits at the ordinary grade. |
| Free plan and trial | FNothing free: no free plan and no trial, just a demo or ordering directly. | FNothing free on record: the site mentions no free plan and no trial. Access starts with a demo or a quote. |
| Features | CUnlimited crawls, canonical and hreflang mapping, PageRank and CheiRank link analysis, raw and rendered HTML compared, and rule tests on the Monitoring plan. The gap: the listing records no Search Console, analytics or log file connections. | BCrawls up to 450 URLs a second, with 350+ reports on technical SEO, AI search readiness, speed and WCAG accessibility. Monitor follows many domains, and Protect tests new code in GitHub, Jenkins, CircleCI or Azure DevOps. Nothing in the listing shows a gap in the core job. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. It's a crawler for technical SEOs, with crawl settings and segments to learn and, on Monitoring, test rules to write. | CNo rating on record. It's four apps on one crawler, with projects, crawl schedules, speed limits and custom extractions to set up, and access goes through a demo first. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no apps and no listed integrations, but API access and exports in XLS, CSV, TSV, JSON and XML come on every plan. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. It links to Search Console, Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, Looker Studio, GitHub, Splunk, Slack and Zapier, and has a public API. |
| Best for | repeated crawls of large multilingual sites | crawling very large sites before each release |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Audisto and Lumar. How we grade
Where they differ
- Audisto also covers internal linking.
- Lumar also covers dashboards and AI search visibility.
At a glance
| Audisto | Lumar | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | €99 per month for 10,000 HTML pages per crawl, billed monthly | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Audisto GmbH | Lumar |
| Price read from | audisto.com | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Audisto
- Sold to businesses only, priced in euros and shown without VAT.
- The price rises with crawl size: the Crawler plan is €659 a month at 1 million HTML pages per crawl and €5,650 at 20 million.
- No free trial or free plan is offered; the site offers a demo and direct ordering.
- Contracts renew automatically each month; cancel by the 13th or the next invoice, issued on the 14th, will not be cancelled.
Lumar
- No prices are published: the pricing page is a quote form, and packages are built from the apps and metrics a team picks.
- Accounts have limits on active projects and on URLs crawled per billing period, set in each contract.
- No free plan or free trial is mentioned on the site; access starts with a demo or a quote.
- SEO and GEO professional services are sold as a separate monthly contract.
Key features
Audisto
- Unlimited crawls
- Run as many crawls a month as you need without credits, with on-demand recrawls of single URLs, multi-domain crawls and full archived HTML.
- Indexability, canonicals and hreflang
- Finds conflicting directives and URLs blocked from crawling, maps canonical groups, and validates hreflang groups across domains.
- Site structure analysis
- Analyzes the internal link graph with PageRank and CheiRank, crawl depth and isolated pages, and can simulate changes on verified sites.
- Rendering and JavaScript errors
- Compares downloaded against rendered HTML to find JavaScript problems, with segmented Web Vitals at scale.
- Automated monitoring
- The Monitoring plan tests every crawl against custom rules, fingerprints files such as robots.txt and sitemaps, and sends real-time alerts.
- API and exports
- API access and unlimited exports in XLS, CSV, TSV, JSON and XML on every plan.
Lumar
- Cloud crawler
- Crawls run in the cloud at up to 450 URLs a second, or 350 rendered, with schedules, speed limits and a safeguard that pauses a crawl when failures pass a set rate.
- Analyze
- Lumar says Analyze has 350+ built-in reports on technical SEO, AI search readiness, site speed and accessibility, plus custom extractions from page HTML.
- Monitor
- Follows key metrics across several domains, site sections or country sites on shared dashboards, with alerts when new issues appear.
- Protect
- Runs automated SEO, speed and accessibility tests on new code, and can stop a build in GitHub, Jenkins, CircleCI or Azure DevOps when a test fails.
- GEO and AI visibility
- Reports on what may keep pages out of AI search answers and tracks brand mentions and sentiment on AI platforms, with AI-written suggestions.
- Accessibility and speed
- Tests pages against WCAG 2.2 levels A to AAA, and runs Lighthouse reports at scale alongside origin-level Chrome UX Report data.
Plans
Audisto
Audisto Crawler€99
per month for 10,000 HTML pages per crawl, billed monthly
Unlimited crawls and users, JavaScript rendering, daily scheduling, API and exports. €659 a month at 1M pages; €1,089 a year billed annually.
Audisto Monitoring€199
per month for 10,000 HTML pages per crawl, billed monthly
Includes the crawler, plus 200 test rules per crawl, real-time critical alerts and hourly scheduling. €1,479 a month at 1M pages.
Lumar
Pricing could not be confirmed. See lumar.io.
Ways to pay less
Audisto
- Annual discount
One month free with annual billing
Audisto's pricing page gives one month free on annual billing: the entry Crawler plan is €1,089 a year instead of €99 a month.
Lumar
No public discounts listed.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Audisto or Lumar?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Audisto starts at €99 per month for 10,000 HTML pages per crawl, billed monthly, and Lumar has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Audisto or Lumar?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Audisto nor Lumar has a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
