ejabberd vs Rocket.Chat (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Rocket.Chat grades higher than ejabberd: 2.4 against 2.0 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 5, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 · graded Oct 10, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA
Rocket.Chat grades higher on platforms. They get the same grade on value for money, the free plan, features and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
ejabberd
Erlang messaging server for XMPP, MQTT, SIP and Matrix
Rocket.Chat
Open-source, self-managed chat for security-focused teams
Which one is for you
Pick ejabberd if
- Fits if you run a large messaging service and know Erlang or XMPP
- Works for companies that want to start free and add paid support later
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a chat app, as it is a server and users need a separate client
- Pricey if you want managed hosting, at €200 a month and rising with traffic
- Pricey if you want Business Edition, at €16,000 a year for a 2-node cluster
- Watch out: TURN, ICE and push for iOS and Android are not in the Community Server
- Skip it if you need paid support on the free edition, since it is community forums only
Pick Rocket.Chat if
- Fits if your organization must host its own chat on its own servers
- Works for teams of up to 50 with someone who can run a server
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you've nobody to install and maintain a server, since the free options are self-managed
- Not for you if you need a price before you talk to sales, as none is published
- Tight if you're past 50 users and hoped to stay on Starter, which stops there and can't run air-gapped
- Watch out: Starter has community support only, and the free Community edition caps 100 concurrent users and isn't meant for production
- Too light for teams that want calls built in, as Rocket.Chat routes them through Pexip, Jitsi, Meet or Zoom
How we grade them
| 2.0GPAejabberdFair | 2.4GPARocket.ChatFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CThe Community Server is free to self-host. Managed Fluux starts at €200 a month and Business at €16,000 a year, so the paid side is steep. | CNo price is published: Commercial, Government and Defense are all quoted by sales, so there's nothing to set against the $7 a month this category typically starts at. What you can price is the free end, and that's $0 for up to 50 self-managed users. |
| Free plan and trial | BThe Community Server is free under GPLv2 with no user cap, but you host it and some features are paid. | BStarter costs nothing for 50 self-managed users with single sign-on, LDAP, multi-factor authentication and end-to-end encryption. The lines are drawn too, though. Support is community-only with no option to buy it, and air-gapped deployment needs a paid plan. |
| Features | CFour protocols, clustering and a REST API. TURN, ICE and mobile push are not in the free edition. | CChannels, groups, direct messages and threads with searchable history in 64 languages, access controls, retention policies and Matrix federation. The hole is calls: Rocket.Chat hosts none itself, routing them through Pexip, Jitsi, BigBlueButton, Meet or Zoom, and Community handles only the first two. |
| Ease of use | DNo rating on record. It is server software, set up and run by an administrator. | DNo rating on record, and both free routes are self-managed, so your team installs the server and keeps it running. Rocket.Chat-run hosting only arrives with a paid plan, which means a conversation with sales first. |
| Platforms and integrations | CRuns on Windows, Mac and Linux servers, with some integrations. It is a server, so users need a separate app. | AWeb, Mac, Windows, Linux, iPhone and Android. There's an open API, a Marketplace and the Apps Engine for building your own, ready-made links to Jitsi, Pexip, BigBlueButton, Google Meet and Zoom, and Matrix federation to share channels with other organizations. |
| Best for | a large-scale XMPP, MQTT and SIP server | chat that never leaves your own servers |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: ejabberd and Rocket.Chat. How we grade
Where they differ
- Rocket.Chat is end-to-end encrypted, according to its own site.
- Rocket.Chat also covers file sharing.
At a glance
| ejabberd | Rocket.Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan | Free plan |
| Starts at | €200 per month (Fluux managed cloud) | Not published |
| Free plan | The Community Server is free and open source under GPLv2, self-hosted. | Starter: a free self-managed workspace for up to 50 users with single sign-on, end-to-end encryption and community support. The MIT-licensed Community edition is also free. |
| Free trial | None listed | Qualifying government, defense and critical infrastructure organizations can get a free guided, hosted evaluation. |
| Web | ||
| macOS | ||
| Windows | ||
| Linux | ||
| iOS | ||
| Android | ||
| Made by | ProcessOne | Rocket.Chat Technologies Corp. |
| Price read from | process-one.net | rocket.chat |
| Checked | Nov 13, 2026 | Oct 5, 2026 |
Worth knowing
ejabberd
- It is a server, not a chat app: users need a separate XMPP client, and you run it yourself unless you pay for Fluux.
- Fluux is priced in euros and by traffic (Jabs) rather than per user; the first step is €200 a month, and the Growing and Established networks start at €1,400 and €6,000 a month.
- The Business Edition price of €16,000 a year is for a 2-node cluster, and its TURN/ICE relay and push features are not in the Community Server.
- Support on the Community Server is community forums and documentation only.
Rocket.Chat
- Paid plan prices are not published; Commercial, Government and Defense are quoted by sales.
- Starter stops at 50 users, cannot be deployed air-gapped and has community support only, with no option to buy support.
- The Community edition has core messaging only and 100 concurrent users, and the vendor says it is not suited to business-critical production use.
- The free options are self-managed, so the team installs and maintains the server; Rocket.Chat-run hosting comes with paid plans.
Key features
ejabberd
- Four protocols in one server
- XMPP, an MQTT broker, a SIP service and Matrix bridging run in the same process.
- Clustering
- The Community Server has standard active-active clustering; the Business Edition and Fluux add consistent-hash clustering.
- Mobile and web support
- Push notifications, message archive management, multi-device sync, WebSocket and BOSH are built into the server.
- REST API and CLI
- A REST API and the ejabberdctl command line cover user and room management.
- Database backends
- The site lists PostgreSQL, MySQL, LDAP and ODBC backends.
- Business and managed options
- Long-term support releases, FIPS compliance and direct engineer support come with the Business Edition, and Fluux runs it as a managed service.
Rocket.Chat
- Channels, direct messages and threads
- Channels, groups, direct messages and threaded discussions with multimedia and file sharing, searchable message history, read receipts and an interface in 64 languages.
- Deployment on your own terms
- Workspaces run on-premises, in a private or sovereign cloud, or on Rocket.Chat's dedicated hosting. Air-gapped deployment is available on paid plans only.
- Identity and access controls
- Active Directory and LDAP authentication, single sign-on, multi-factor authentication and role-based access control are included from the free Starter plan.
- Encryption and data policies
- End-to-end encryption can be switched on for messages and files, alongside data retention policies, data loss prevention and content moderation.
- Video through integrations
- Calls connect through Pexip, Jitsi, BigBlueButton, Google Meet or Zoom on Starter. The Community edition supports Jitsi and BigBlueButton only.
- Federation, apps and API
- Matrix protocol federation links separate organizations in shared channels, and the Marketplace, Apps Engine and open API cover custom apps and integrations.
Plans
ejabberd
Community Server$0
Open source under GPLv2; you host it yourself. Supports XMPP, MQTT, SIP and Matrix, with community forums and documentation.
Fluux Emerging€200
per month, managed cloud, 1 node on shared servers
Managed by ProcessOne, with a shared-server domain and standard support. Price rises with traffic measured in Jabs: 9,000,000 Jabs at €200, 45,000,000 at €500.
Business Edition€16,000
per year for a 2-node cluster
Commercial license with long-term support releases, push for iOS, Android and Firebase, and direct support from ProcessOne. Sold through sales.
Rocket.Chat
Starter$0
Self-managed workspace for up to 50 users with SSO, LDAP, multi-factor authentication, end-to-end encryption and community-only support.
Community$0
Open-source (MIT) edition with core messaging only, up to 100 concurrent users and push notifications capped at 10,000 a month.
CommercialCustom
For commercial enterprises: on-premises, private cloud or dedicated cloud hosting, high availability and regulatory compliance features.
GovernmentCustom
For public sector agencies: on-premises or sovereign cloud deployment, tamper-evident audit logs, retention policies and Matrix federation.
DefenseCustom
For defense and intelligence: air-gapped deployment, DoD ATO up to IL6, FIPS 140-3 validated cryptography and clearance-based access control.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, ejabberd or Rocket.Chat?
As of Nov 13, 2026, ejabberd starts at €200 per month (Fluux managed cloud), and Rocket.Chat publishes no starting price.
Which has a free plan, ejabberd or Rocket.Chat?
As of Nov 13, 2026, both ejabberd and Rocket.Chat have a free plan.
Which platforms do ejabberd and Rocket.Chat run on?
As of Nov 13, 2026, only Rocket.Chat lists a web app and iOS and Android apps. Both list macOS, Windows and Linux apps. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.