Skip to content

GEORank vs LLMrefs (2026): which should you pick?

As of Oct 24, 2026, GEORank grades higher than LLMrefs: 2.4 against 2.2 out of 4.0.

Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 and Oct 24, 2026 by ToolGPA

GEORank grades higher on value for money. LLMrefs grades higher on platforms. They get the same grade on the free plan, features and ease of use.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

GEORank

Japanese AI search rank tracker for Gemini, ChatGPT and Perplexity

Free trial

LLMrefs

Keyword-based AI search visibility tracker with one flat plan

Free trial · from $79/mo

Which one is for you

Pick GEORank if

  • Fits if you sell in Japan and want daily AI answer tracking for a few thousand yen a month
  • Works for teams focused on Google's AI answers, which Starter follows through Gemini

Look elsewhere if

  • Not for you if you don't read Japanese, as the site, app and support are all in Japanese
  • Tight if you track more than a handful of questions: 5 prompts on Starter, 12 on Standard, and 10 more cost Â¥2,500 a month
  • Skip it if you need ChatGPT or Perplexity on a small budget, as both start at Standard for Â¥6,300 a month, and Claude isn't listed at all
  • Watch out: plans renew monthly with no refunds or prorating, and no yearly plan is listed
  • Watch out: prices are in yen before tax, so the dollar figures here are rough

Pick LLMrefs if

  • Fits if you already track SEO keywords and want the same lists checked in AI answers
  • Works for agencies, since projects and seats are unlimited on one plan

Look elsewhere if

  • Skip it if you need daily data, as it refreshes about once a week per keyword
  • Not for you if you need SSO, white-label reports or an enterprise tier, as none are listed
  • Skip it if you need a price you can count on, as $79 is marked limited time only
  • Watch out: no integrations are listed beyond the API and CSV export

How we grade them

2.4GPAGEORankFair2.2GPALLMrefsFair
Value for money
AStarter is ¥1,800 a month before tax, roughly $12 at a rough exchange rate, under $17.40, which is 60% of where this category's cheaper quarter starts. But it covers 5 prompts on Gemini only. Standard, with 3 engines, is ¥6,300, roughly $42.
C$79 a month for 500 prompts on every engine, with unlimited projects and seats. That's mid-range for this category, between $29 and $95. But the price is marked limited time only, with no end date or regular price given.
Free plan and trial
CNo free plan, but a 7-day trial of every feature with no card, and nothing is charged when it ends.
CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial, and signing up needs no credit card.
Features
CDaily checks, a recommendation share that drops warning mentions, cited sites with to-dos, page rewrites and generated JSON-LD, robots.txt and llms.txt. The gaps are in the listing: Starter is Gemini only, and prompts stop at 5 or 12.
CFan-out prompts built from your keywords, share of voice and position across ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI and DeepSeek, and cited sources in 50+ countries. The gap: data refreshes weekly, not daily.
Ease of use
CNo rating on record. The site, app and support are in Japanese, which is a wall for anyone who doesn't read it.
CNo rating on record. Importing an SEO keyword list is a familiar start, but you still set up projects, countries and competitors before the rankings say much.
Platforms and integrations
CWeb only, with no desktop or phone app and no integrations or API listed. CSV export starts at Standard.
BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app and no integrations on record. The one plan includes an API and CSV export.
Best fordaily AI answer tracking in Japantracking AI visibility by keyword, not prompt

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: GEORank and LLMrefs. How we grade

Where they differ

  • GEORank also covers site audit, content optimization and schema markup.
In commonWebReportsAI search visibility

At a glance

GEORankLLMrefs
PricingFree trialFree trial
Starts at¥1,800 per month for 5 prompts on Gemini, before tax (¥1,980 with tax)$79 per month for 500 prompts
Free planNoneNone
Free trial7-day free trial of all features, no credit card required and no automatic charge7-day free trial; signing up needs no credit card
Web
Made byC3reve.IncLLMrefs
Price read fromgeorank.jpllmrefs.com
CheckedOct 23, 2026Oct 23, 2026

Worth knowing

GEORank

  • The site, app and support are in Japanese, prices are in yen and the service is aimed at the Japanese market.
  • Starter tracks only Gemini with Google Search; ChatGPT and Perplexity start at Standard.
  • Prompt limits are small: 5 on Starter, 12 on Standard; 10 more cost Â¥2,500 a month before tax.
  • Plans renew monthly with no refunds or prorating after payment; no annual plan is listed.

LLMrefs

  • There is one plan; the $79 price is labeled limited time only, with no end date or regular price given.
  • Dashboard data refreshes at least once a week per keyword, not daily.
  • The pricing page lists no enterprise tier, SSO or white-label options.

Key features

GEORank

Daily AI answer tracking
Each morning at 07:00 it asks every registered question and scores how often you and your competitors are named; Starter checks Gemini only.
Context-aware recommendation share
Mentions where AI names a brand as a warning or a poor fit are left out, so the share counts only real recommendations.
Cited sources with to-dos
Pulls out the outside sites answers cite, such as press-release services and comparison portals, and suggests what to do on each; to-dos start at Standard.
GEO site audit
Gemini reviews a page's text and proposes before-and-after rewrites with a score, and the audit generates robots.txt, JSON-LD and llms.txt code.
Daily ranking sheet
A spreadsheet-style table shows your mention position for each question by day, in the format Japanese SEO teams use for rank tracking.

LLMrefs

Keyword-based tracking
Import SEO keyword lists; LLMrefs generates fan-out prompts for each keyword from real AI conversations and aggregates the answers.
Share of voice rankings
Ranks brands against competitors per keyword by share of voice and average position, weighted across every prompt.
Source and citation lists
Shows and filters the URLs AI engines cite when answering about your products, to find content and outreach targets.
Countries and languages
Geo-targeted tracking in 50+ countries and 20+ languages, filterable by engine and country.
Agency projects
Unlimited projects and seats under one subscription, with client dashboards and keywords spread across projects.
Free AI SEO tools
An AI crawlability checker, a Reddit threads finder and an llms.txt generator come with the plan.

Plans

GEORank

  • StarterÂ¥1,800

    per month for 5 prompts on Gemini, before tax (Â¥1,980 with tax)

    1 project, up to 5 competitors, daily checks on Gemini with Google Search, 10 site audits a month and 1 team member.

  • StandardÂ¥6,300

    per month for 12 prompts on 3 engines, before tax (Â¥6,930 with tax)

    2 projects, up to 10 competitors, Gemini, ChatGPT and Perplexity, cited-source to-dos, CSV export, unlimited own-site audits and 30 other URLs a month.

  • BusinessÂ¥27,000

    per month for 50 prompts on 3 engines, before tax (Â¥29,700 with tax)

    10 projects for client work, up to 100 competitors, priority runs, 200 audits of other URLs a month and PDF reports under your own name.

LLMrefs

  • All in One$79

    per month for 500 prompts

    All AI engines, weekly reports, citations, 50+ countries, unlimited projects and users, CSV export and API. Marked limited time only.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, GEORank or LLMrefs?

As of Oct 23, 2026, GEORank starts at ¥1,800 per month for 5 prompts on Gemini, before tax (¥1,980 with tax), and LLMrefs starts at $79 per month for 500 prompts.

Which has a free plan, GEORank or LLMrefs?

As of Oct 23, 2026, neither GEORank nor LLMrefs has a free plan. Both have a free trial.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade