Skip to content

Google Rich Results Test vs Schema App (2026): which should you pick?

As of Oct 23, 2026, Google Rich Results Test grades higher than Schema App: 2.8 against 1.8 out of 4.0.

Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA

Google Rich Results Test grades higher on value for money, the free plan and ease of use. Schema App grades higher on features and platforms.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

Google Rich Results Test

Free Google check of which rich results a page's structured data earns

Free

Schema App

Managed enterprise schema markup and content knowledge graph

Paid

Which one is for you

Pick Google Rich Results Test if

  • Fits if you're checking structured data before a page goes live
  • Works for finding out why a rich result stopped showing for a page

Look elsewhere if

  • Skip it if you need general schema.org checks, as it only knows Google's rich result types
  • Not for you if the page is behind a login, firewall or robots.txt block, unless you paste the code or use a tunnel
  • Watch out: passing the test doesn't mean Google will show the rich result, as it picks layouts per search
  • Watch out: shared links and saved history last about 90 days, and anyone with the link can open them

Pick Schema App if

  • Fits if you run an enterprise site with thousands of product, blog or location pages to mark up
  • Makes sense if you want an outside team to manage your structured data rather than doing it in-house

Look elsewhere if

  • Not for you if you want to see a price first, as every contract is a quote from a sales call
  • Skip it if you want to try it, as there's no trial and contracts run at least 12 months
  • Watch out: the platform isn't sold on its own to new customers, and an hour a month of paid support is part of every contract
  • Pricey if a customer-facing chatbot calls its MCP server a lot, at $100 per 100,000 requests past the first 100,000 a month
  • Watch out: there's a one-time strategy and setup fee on top, and Entity Hub is an add-on

How we grade them

2.8GPAGoogle Rich Results TestGood1.8GPASchema AppWeak
Value for money
AFree, from Google, with URL and code tests, search previews and shareable results. Nothing to buy.
CNo price is published: every contract is a custom quote given on a sales call, plus a one-time strategy and setup fee. With nothing to compare, it sits at the ordinary grade.
Free plan and trial
AOpen to anyone in a browser with no account, as often as you like.
FNothing free. There's no trial, and contracts run for at least 12 months.
Features
DOne narrow job: rich result eligibility for the types Google supports, with crawl checks, previews and a code explorer. For general schema.org checks Google points you to the Schema Markup Validator.
CAn Editor for single pages, a Highlighter that marks up whole templates, deployment through AEM, Drupal, WordPress, Shopify, Cloudflare, Akamai or a tag manager, a knowledge graph, Search Console analytics and an MCP server. It does schema fully, but that's a smaller job.
Ease of use
BNo rating on record, and nothing to set up: enter a URL or paste code and run it. Clicking an error opens the source at that line.
CNo rating on record. A customer success manager does much of the work, but there's a strategy and setup phase before markup goes live, and Search Console to connect.
Platforms and integrations
CWeb only, linked to Google Search Console, with no API on record.
BWeb only, with plugins and functions for AEM, Drupal, WordPress, Shopify, Cloudflare, Akamai and Google Tag Manager, plus Search Console and an MCP server. No desktop or phone app.
Best forchecking a page qualifies for Google rich resultsmanaged schema markup across big websites

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Google Rich Results Test and Schema App. How we grade

Where they differ

  • Google Rich Results Test also covers site audit.
  • Schema App also covers reports and AI search visibility.
In commonWebSchema markup

At a glance

Google Rich Results TestSchema App
PricingFreePaid
Starts atFreeNot published
Free planOpen to anyone in a browser with no account: test any public URL or a code snippet as often as you like, and share results by link for about 90 days.None
Free trialNone listedNone listed
Web
Made byGoogleHunch Manifest Inc
Price read fromsearch.google.comNot confirmed
CheckedOct 23, 2026Oct 23, 2026

Worth knowing

Google Rich Results Test

  • Checks only the rich result types Google Search supports; Google points to the Schema Markup Validator for general schema.org checks.
  • Pages behind a firewall or login, or blocked by robots.txt, cannot be tested by URL; you need a tunnel or a code snippet.
  • A passing test does not guarantee a rich result: Google says it chooses result layouts per search.
  • Shared results links and saved test history last only about 90 days, and anyone with a bookmark can open it.

Schema App

  • No prices are published: every contract is a custom quote, plus a one-time strategy and setup fee.
  • Contracts run for at least 12 months, and there is no free trial.
  • The platform is no longer sold on its own to new customers; at least 1 hour a month of paid support is part of every contract.
  • Customer-facing chatbot use of the MCP server includes 100,000 requests a month, then costs $100 per 100,000; Entity Hub is an add-on.

Key features

Google Rich Results Test

Test a URL or a code snippet
Enter a public URL, or paste code and edit and rerun it as often as needed; JSON-LD, RDFa and Microdata are supported.
Rich result detection
Lists the rich result types found, such as Article, Breadcrumb, Event, Job posting, Product snippet, Recipe and Review snippet, with each item's errors and warnings.
Crawl checks
Reports whether Google could crawl and fetch the page, whether robots.txt allows it, and which page resources failed to load.
Search result preview
For some rich result types, shows how the result might look in Google Search on desktop and mobile.
Code explorer
Clicking an error opens the rendered source at the line in question.
Shareable results and history
Share a results link that anyone can open, and bookmark runs to keep a test history, each kept for about 90 days.

Schema App

Schema App Editor
Creates schema markup for individual pages by filling in forms, with no code to write, and manages it in one place.
Schema App Highlighter
Writes markup once for a page template, such as product, blog or location pages, and deploys it to thousands of matching pages and languages.
Deployment without IT
Pushes markup through plugins for Adobe Experience Manager, Drupal, WordPress and Shopify, a Cloudflare or Akamai function, or a tag manager.
Content knowledge graph
Links the entities in your markup to each other and to outside knowledge bases, and gathers them into an RDF knowledge graph you can reuse.
Schema Performance Analytics
Reports clicks, impressions and rich results from Search Console by page, query and markup template, without Search Console's 1,000-row export limit.
MCP server
Exposes the knowledge graph to AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot Studio; use inside your own organization is included.

Plans

Google Rich Results Test

  • Free$0

    URL and code tests for JSON-LD, RDFa and Microdata, smartphone or desktop crawler, previews and shareable results.

Schema App

Pricing could not be confirmed. See schemaapp.com.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Google Rich Results Test or Schema App?

As of Oct 23, 2026, Google Rich Results Test is free, and Schema App has no price we could confirm.

Which has a free plan, Google Rich Results Test or Schema App?

As of Oct 23, 2026, only Google Rich Results Test has a free plan. Schema App does not.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade