Google Rich Results Test vs SEOMarkup Schema Inspector (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Google Rich Results Test and SEOMarkup Schema Inspector share a 2.8 GPA, both are free, so the choice depends on which platforms you need.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
They get the same grade on all five counts.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Google Rich Results Test
Free Google check of which rich results a page's structured data earns
SEOMarkup Schema Inspector
Free, open-source Chrome extension that shows a page's JSON-LD
Which one is for you
Pick Google Rich Results Test if
- Fits if you're checking structured data before a page goes live
- Works for finding out why a rich result stopped showing for a page
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you need general schema.org checks, as it only knows Google's rich result types
- Not for you if the page is behind a login, firewall or robots.txt block, unless you paste the code or use a tunnel
- Watch out: passing the test doesn't mean Google will show the rich result, as it picks layouts per search
- Watch out: shared links and saved history last about 90 days, and anyone with the link can open them
Pick SEOMarkup Schema Inspector if
- Fits if you debug structured data before a release and want to read it as a tree
- Works for seeing which schema types a competitor's page uses
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if the page uses Microdata or RDFa, which are only flagged, not shown
- Too light for validation on its own, as that means opening Google's or Schema.org's tester
- Not for you if you use Firefox or Safari, as it runs in Chromium browsers only
- Watch out: the developer hasn't identified itself as a trader, so EU consumer rights don't apply
How we grade them
| 2.8GPAGoogle Rich Results TestGood | 2.8GPASEOMarkup Schema InspectorGood | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | AFree, from Google, with URL and code tests, search previews and shareable results. Nothing to buy. | AFree for good and open source under the MIT license, with no paid tier, trial or card. |
| Free plan and trial | AOpen to anyone in a browser with no account, as often as you like. | AFree outright: every feature in the extension, with no account needed. |
| Features | DOne narrow job: rich result eligibility for the types Google supports, with crawl checks, previews and a code explorer. For general schema.org checks Google points you to the Schema Markup Validator. | DOne narrow function: JSON-LD parsed into trees, @graph split up, full-text search, copy and download, and parse error banners. Microdata and RDFa are only detected, and validation means opening Google's or Schema.org's tester. |
| Ease of use | BNo rating on record, and nothing to set up: enter a URL or paste code and run it. Clicking an error opens the source at that line. | BNo rating on record, but no account and nothing to set up: open a page, click the icon and the schemas are listed. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only, linked to Google Search Console, with no API on record. | CChrome and other Chromium browsers, so computers only, with no Firefox or Safari version. It hands off to Google's Rich Results Test and the Schema.org validator. |
| Best for | checking a page qualifies for Google rich results | reading a page's JSON-LD as a tree |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Google Rich Results Test and SEOMarkup Schema Inspector. How we grade
Where they differ
- SEOMarkup Schema Inspector is open source, according to its own site.
- Google Rich Results Test also covers site audit.
At a glance
| Google Rich Results Test | SEOMarkup Schema Inspector | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starts at | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Open to anyone in a browser with no account: test any public URL or a code snippet as often as you like, and share results by link for about 90 days. | Completely free, with no paid tier, trial or card; the vendor's FAQ says it is free for good and open source under the MIT license. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Browser extension | ||
| Made by | SEOMarkup | |
| Price read from | search.google.com | seomarkup.site |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Google Rich Results Test
- Checks only the rich result types Google Search supports; Google points to the Schema Markup Validator for general schema.org checks.
- Pages behind a firewall or login, or blocked by robots.txt, cannot be tested by URL; you need a tunnel or a code snippet.
- A passing test does not guarantee a rich result: Google says it chooses result layouts per search.
- Shared results links and saved test history last only about 90 days, and anyone with a bookmark can open it.
SEOMarkup Schema Inspector
- Microdata and RDFa are only detected and labelled, not displayed; full parsing covers JSON-LD.
- Validation happens by opening Google's Rich Results Test or validator.schema.org, not inside the extension.
- It is listed for Chrome, and the vendor says it works in other Chromium-based browsers; there is no Firefox or Safari version named.
- The Chrome Web Store notes the developer has not identified itself as a trader, so EU consumer rights do not apply.
Key features
Google Rich Results Test
- Test a URL or a code snippet
- Enter a public URL, or paste code and edit and rerun it as often as needed; JSON-LD, RDFa and Microdata are supported.
- Rich result detection
- Lists the rich result types found, such as Article, Breadcrumb, Event, Job posting, Product snippet, Recipe and Review snippet, with each item's errors and warnings.
- Crawl checks
- Reports whether Google could crawl and fetch the page, whether robots.txt allows it, and which page resources failed to load.
- Search result preview
- For some rich result types, shows how the result might look in Google Search on desktop and mobile.
- Code explorer
- Clicking an error opens the rendered source at the line in question.
- Shareable results and history
- Share a results link that anyone can open, and bookmark runs to keep a test history, each kept for about 90 days.
SEOMarkup Schema Inspector
- JSON-LD tree view
- Parses every JSON-LD script block, splits @graph arrays into separate schemas and shows each as an expandable tree.
- Full-text search
- Search for a property name, value or URL across all schemas on the page, with next and previous match buttons.
- Copy, download, validate
- Copy a schema as raw JSON or a ready-to-paste script tag, download it as a .json file, or open the page in Google's Rich Results Test or validator.schema.org.
- Parse error banners
- When a JSON-LD block is malformed, a banner shows which block broke and why.
- Microdata and RDFa detection
- Flags when a page also uses Microdata or RDFa, though only JSON-LD is shown in full.
- Schema.org links
- Click any schema type to open its documentation on Schema.org.
Plans
Google Rich Results Test
Free$0
URL and code tests for JSON-LD, RDFa and Microdata, smartphone or desktop crawler, previews and shareable results.
SEOMarkup Schema Inspector
Free$0
Every feature of the extension, free from the Chrome Web Store with no account.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Google Rich Results Test or SEOMarkup Schema Inspector?
As of Oct 23, 2026, both Google Rich Results Test and SEOMarkup Schema Inspector are free to use.
Which has a free plan, Google Rich Results Test or SEOMarkup Schema Inspector?
As of Oct 23, 2026, both Google Rich Results Test and SEOMarkup Schema Inspector have a free plan.
Which platforms do Google Rich Results Test and SEOMarkup Schema Inspector run on?
As of Oct 23, 2026, only Google Rich Results Test lists a web app and only SEOMarkup Schema Inspector lists a browser extension. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
- Google Rich Results Test vs Schema Markup Validator
- Google Rich Results Test vs Google Search Console
- Google Rich Results Test vs Schema App
- Google Rich Results Test vs Schemantra
- Google Rich Results Test vs Schema.dev
- SEOMarkup Schema Inspector vs Schema Markup Validator
- SEOMarkup Schema Inspector vs Detailed SEO Extension
- SEOMarkup Schema Inspector vs Sprout SEO
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.