Lumar vs Seolyzer (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Lumar and Seolyzer share a 2.0 GPA, neither has a free plan and their prices can't be set side by side, so the choice depends on which features you need.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
They get the same grade on all five counts.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Which one is for you
Pick Lumar if
- Fits if your site has hundreds of thousands of pages and an enterprise budget
- Makes sense if you want SEO checks to block a release in your CI/CD pipeline
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want to see a price before talking to sales, as it's quote-only
- Skip it if you want to try it first, since there's no free plan or trial on record
- Tight if you crawl a lot, as active projects and URLs per billing period are capped by contract
- Watch out: SEO and GEO professional services are a separate monthly contract
Pick Seolyzer if
- Fits if you run a large French or European site and want Googlebot's activity live
- Works for data teams pulling SEO data into their own dashboards
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a price before a demo, as none is published
- Skip it if you're buying for yourself, since its terms cover business customers only
- Watch out: subscriptions renew on their own and must be cancelled by registered letter a month ahead
- Tight if you can't connect your server logs, which the log analysis needs
How we grade them
| 2.0GPALumarFair | 2.0GPASeolyzerFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CNo price is published. Lumar's pricing page is a quote form, so you only find out what it costs on a sales call, with packages built from the apps and metrics you pick. With no figure to compare, it sits at the ordinary grade. | CNo price is published. The old pricing page is gone and the site offers only a demo booking, so the cost comes out on a sales call, in euros, before tax. |
| Free plan and trial | FNothing free on record: the site mentions no free plan and no trial. Access starts with a demo or a quote. | FNothing free on record: no free plan and no trial, just a demo. |
| Features | BCrawls up to 450 URLs a second, with 350+ reports on technical SEO, AI search readiness, speed and WCAG accessibility. Monitor follows many domains, and Protect tests new code in GitHub, Jenkins, CircleCI or Azure DevOps. Nothing in the listing shows a gap in the core job. | BCrawls sites of several million pages, shows Googlebot's crawl in real time from your logs, merges the two to find orphan and ignored pages, and serves raw crawl, log, Search Console and CrUX data through an API. The listing shows no gap in the core job. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. It's four apps on one crawler, with projects, crawl schedules, speed limits and custom extractions to set up, and access goes through a demo first. | CNo rating on record. The log reports stay empty until your server logs are connected, and then there are page categories to build. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. It links to Search Console, Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics, Looker Studio, GitHub, Splunk, Slack and Zapier, and has a public API. | BWeb only. It connects to Search Console and works with BigQuery and Power BI through an API with no limit on calls or rows. |
| Best for | crawling very large sites before each release | live Googlebot activity from server logs |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Lumar and Seolyzer. How we grade
Where they differ
- Lumar also covers dashboards, AI search visibility and page speed.
- Seolyzer also covers internal linking and log file analysis.
In commonWebPublic APISite audit
At a glance
| Lumar | Seolyzer | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Starts at | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Lumar | Seolyzer SAS |
| Price read from | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Lumar
- No prices are published: the pricing page is a quote form, and packages are built from the apps and metrics a team picks.
- Accounts have limits on active projects and on URLs crawled per billing period, set in each contract.
- No free plan or free trial is mentioned on the site; access starts with a demo or a quote.
- SEO and GEO professional services are sold as a separate monthly contract.
Seolyzer
- No prices are published: the old pricing page no longer exists and the site offers only a demo booking.
- Its terms of sale cover business customers only and say prices are set in euros, excluding tax.
- Subscriptions renew automatically and must be cancelled by registered letter at least one month before the renewal date.
- Log analysis needs your server log files to be connected to the service.
Key features
Lumar
- Cloud crawler
- Crawls run in the cloud at up to 450 URLs a second, or 350 rendered, with schedules, speed limits and a safeguard that pauses a crawl when failures pass a set rate.
- Analyze
- Lumar says Analyze has 350+ built-in reports on technical SEO, AI search readiness, site speed and accessibility, plus custom extractions from page HTML.
- Monitor
- Follows key metrics across several domains, site sections or country sites on shared dashboards, with alerts when new issues appear.
- Protect
- Runs automated SEO, speed and accessibility tests on new code, and can stop a build in GitHub, Jenkins, CircleCI or Azure DevOps when a test fails.
- GEO and AI visibility
- Reports on what may keep pages out of AI search answers and tracks brand mentions and sentiment on AI platforms, with AI-written suggestions.
- Accessibility and speed
- Tests pages against WCAG 2.2 levels A to AAA, and runs Lighthouse reports at scale alongside origin-level Chrome UX Report data.
Seolyzer
- SEO crawler
- Crawls sites of several million pages for indexability, status codes, titles and meta tags, depth, response time, sitemaps, orphan pages and internal PageRank.
- Real-time log analysis
- Shows live which pages Googlebot crawls most, mobile against desktop bots, server response times, cached pages, bad bots and visits from Google Discover and News.
- Cross analysis
- Merges crawl and log data to find orphan, ignored and inactive pages, redirects and errors Googlebot does not follow, and sitemap crawl rates.
- Page categorization
- Group URLs into multi-level categories that apply live and to past data, to see which page types bots favor.
- API
- Raw and aggregated crawl, log, Search Console and CrUX data in JSON, with no limit on calls or rows, and BigQuery and Power BI compatible.
- Unlimited sharing
- Share project data with your team or outside providers without a cap on users and at no extra cost.
Plans
Lumar
Pricing could not be confirmed. See lumar.io.
Seolyzer
Pricing could not be confirmed. See seolyzer.io.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Lumar or Seolyzer?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Lumar has no price we could confirm, and Seolyzer has no price we could confirm.
Which has a free plan, Lumar or Seolyzer?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Lumar nor Seolyzer has a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.