Rankscale AI vs Spotaq (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 24, 2026, we pick Rankscale AI: it is first in our ranking of AI search visibility tools, and it grades higher too, 3.0 against 2.4.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 and Oct 24, 2026 by ToolGPA
Rankscale AI grades higher on value for money, features and platforms. Spotaq grades higher on ease of use. They get the same grade on the free plan.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Rankscale AI
Credit-based AI visibility tracker covering 17+ AI engines
Spotaq
AI visibility checker with a free scan, PDF audits and weekly tracking
Which one is for you
Pick Rankscale AI if
- Fits if you want 17+ AI engines on one plan and can do the credit sums
- Works for brands where local results matter, as it shows your place in AI map packs
Look elsewhere if
- Tight if you track a lot every day, since monitoring pauses when the credits run out until renewal or a top-up
- Skip it if you want the cheapest plan paid monthly, as Essentials is yearly only and the trial is for Pro
- Pricey if you need the REST API, which starts at Pro+ for $229 a month, or white label at $385
- Watch out: Claude costs 2 credits a run against 0.25 for ChatGPT, so Essentials' 120 credits go fast
- Watch out: extra brand dashboard slots are bought separately in the app
Pick Spotaq if
- Fits if you want a free look at whether AI recommends your product, with no signup
- Works for teams that want a one-off audit PDF to pass around, for $19
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want to track your own prompts, as it uses a curated set built around buyer intents
- Watch out: the pricing page names ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google-grounded AI, while the homepage also shows Claude and Gemini without saying which plans check them
- Tight if you track more than one brand: Monitor covers one domain, and Pro caps runs at 30 a month across 5
- Watch out: the free scan keeps no history, so tracking over time means Monitor at $49 a month
- Not for you if you need an API or integrations, as none are listed, or yearly billing, which is arranged by email
How we grade them
| 3.0GPARankscale AIVery good | 2.4GPASpotaqFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | A$17 a month on yearly billing is just under $17.40, the line for an A in this category. But Essentials' 120 credits cover about five prompts a day on ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity at 0.25 a run. Pro, at $99 a month for 1,200 credits, is where daily tracking gets room. | BA full audit PDF is $19 once, so even one a month stays inside this category's cheaper quarter, which starts at $29. Weekly monitoring of one domain is $49 a month, the category's middle, and Pro is $149 for 5. |
| Free plan and trial | CNo free plan, just a 7-day trial of Pro with a limited credit allowance. Enough to see how fast credits drain, not much more. | CA free scan from the home page with no signup or email, on the same engines and scoring as the paid plans. It's a snapshot, though: no saved history, and the full answers and fix pack are paid. |
| Features | AAll 17+ engines on every plan, Claude and DeepSeek included, with visibility, sentiment, citations and query fan-out, plus things few rivals track: your place in AI local and map packs, and the questions ChatGPT asks before it recommends brands. Page audits cover what to fix. | CA 0 to 100 score, a Missed Prompts report, the sites each answer drew on and a fix pack of copy and schema. The gaps are in the listing: you can't write your own prompts, and which plans check Claude and Gemini isn't stated. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. A run costs 0.25 to 2 credits depending on the engine, and tracking pauses when credits run out, so there are sums to do before you set a schedule. | BNo rating on record, but there's nothing to set up: the prompts are a curated set, and the free scan runs from the home page with no account. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. Looker Studio, Google Sheets, Cloudflare and an MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor, with the REST API from Pro+ at $229. | CWeb only, with no desktop or phone app and no integrations or API listed. Results go out as a PDF and a weekly email. |
| Best for | 17+ AI engines from $17 a month | a quick check of whether AI recommends you |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Rankscale AI and Spotaq. How we grade
Where they differ
- Rankscale AI also covers web analytics.
- Spotaq also covers schema markup.
At a glance
| Rankscale AI | Spotaq | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free trial | Free plan |
| Starts at | $17 per month, billed yearly only (Essentials) | $19 one-time for a single-domain audit PDF |
| Free plan | None | Free instant scan with no signup or email: the SpotAQ score, which engines mention you and which competitors AI recommended instead. No saved history. |
| Free trial | 7-day free trial of the Pro plan with a limited credit allowance | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Rankscale GmbH | Spotaq |
| Price read from | rankscale.ai | spotaq.com |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Rankscale AI
- Tracking is limited by credits, not prompts: each engine run costs 0.25 to 2 credits, and monitoring pauses when credits run out until renewal or a top-up.
- Essentials is sold on yearly billing only; the 7-day trial is for Pro.
- The REST API starts at Pro+ ($229 a month); white-label dashboards start at Growth.
- Extra brand dashboard slots are bought separately in the app.
Spotaq
- Prompts are a curated set built around buyer intents, not a list you write yourself; Pro adds pricing and category-leader questions.
- The pricing page names ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google-grounded AI; the homepage also shows Claude and Gemini without saying which plans check them.
- Monitor covers one domain; tracking more brands means Pro, which caps runs at 30 a month across 5 domains.
- There is no yearly discount yet; plans are month to month, and paying for a year is arranged by email.
Key features
Rankscale AI
- Wide engine coverage
- All plans can query 17+ engines, from ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity at 0.25 credits a run to Claude at 2 credits, on schedules from hourly to monthly.
- Visibility, sentiment and citations
- Tracks a visibility score over time, benchmarks competitors, analyzes sentiment and shows which sources AI engines cite.
- Query fan-out and ChatGPT follow-ups
- Shows the internal searches AI engines run while answering, and the clarifying questions ChatGPT asks before recommending brands.
- Shopping, ads and local results
- Analyzes shopping cards and sponsored ads in ChatGPT, AI Mode and Copilot, and brand placement in AI local and map packs.
- AI visits from Cloudflare
- A read-only Cloudflare connection reports AI crawler and assistant visits, top pages and the 404 errors AI bots hit.
- Sharing, API and MCP
- Shareable dashboard links, CSV and Google Sheets exports, Data Studio, an MCP server for AI assistants and, from Pro+, a REST API.
Spotaq
- SpotAQ score
- A 0 to 100 score averaged across the prompts in a check, built from mention rate, sentiment, which sites are cited and whether Google grounding finds your site.
- Missed Prompts report
- Lists the buyer questions where AI named a competitor instead of you, with an opportunity score and a suggested next move for each.
- Fix pack
- Copy-ready positioning rewrites and JSON-LD schema suggestions, drawn from the AI answers already collected for the run.
- Citation chain
- Shows whether answers drew on your own site, review sites, directories or third-party articles, prompt by prompt.
- Weekly monitoring
- Monitor and Pro keep score history, compute changes between runs, track when competitors appear or drop off and email a weekly digest.
Plans
Rankscale AI
Essentials$17
per month for 120 credits, billed yearly only
For individuals and startups: 2 brand dashboards and 10 page audits a month. Shown as $20 crossed out.
Pro$99
per month for 1,200 credits, billed monthly
Up to 4,800 AI answers a month, 10 brand dashboards, 50 page audits, Looker Studio and MCP. Unused credits roll over up to 2x.
Pro+$229
per month for 3,000 credits, billed monthly
Up to 12,000 answers, 25 brand dashboards, 100 page audits, REST API access and 5 prompt researches a month.
Growth$385
per month for 5,500 credits, billed monthly
For agencies: up to 22,000 answers, 50 brand dashboards, 200 page audits, white-label dashboards and the agency program.
Enterprise$780
per month for 12,000 credits, billed monthly
Up to 48,000 answers, 100 brand dashboards, REST API access, a dedicated partner, and credit rollover up to 3x.
Custom PlanCustom
Built around credit volume and team size, with options such as SSO, custom API work, SLA guarantees and a success manager.
Spotaq
Free scan$0
An instant scorecard for any site, run from the homepage with no account, using the same engines and scoring as the paid plans.
Audit$19
one-time, for 1 domain
One full benchmark with every prompt, answer and citation, a scored Missed Prompts report and a fix pack, as a shareable PDF.
Monitor$49
per month for 1 domain, billed monthly
The audit re-run weekly (up to 6 runs a month) with score history, competitor tracking, a weekly email digest and alerts.
Pro$149
per month for up to 5 domains, billed monthly
30 runs a month shared across domains, 4 extended checks of up to 14 questions, 1,000 quick re-checks and 3 named competitors per domain.
Ways to pay less
Rankscale AI
- Annual discount
15% off with yearly billing
Rankscale's pricing FAQ says yearly billing is 15% cheaper than monthly, paid 12 months upfront, with credits still renewing each month.
Spotaq
No public discounts listed.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Rankscale AI or Spotaq?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Rankscale AI starts at $17 per month, billed yearly only (Essentials), and Spotaq starts at $19 one-time for a single-domain audit PDF.
Which has a free plan, Rankscale AI or Spotaq?
As of Oct 23, 2026, only Spotaq has a free plan. Rankscale AI does not, though it has a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
