Skip to content

AccuRanker vs GRC (2026): which should you pick?

As of Oct 23, 2026, GRC grades higher than AccuRanker: 2.0 against 1.8 out of 4.0.

Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA

AccuRanker grades higher on features and platforms. GRC grades higher on value for money and the free plan. They get the same grade on ease of use.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

AccuRanker

Daily rank tracker for agencies and enterprises, priced by keywords

From $224/mo

GRC

Japanese Windows rank checker, now limited to Yahoo results

Free plan

Which one is for you

Pick AccuRanker if

  • Fits if you're an agency tracking thousands of keywords across client sites
  • Works for teams that need rankings refreshed during the day, not just overnight

Look elsewhere if

  • Pricey if you have one site and a few hundred keywords, as it starts at $224 a month
  • Not for you if you want to try it first, since there's no free plan or trial, only a demo
  • Skip it if AI answer tracking is the point, as AccuLLM is extra at $206 a month
  • Watch out: Looker Studio and the API start at Expert, $764 a month; BigQuery and the write API are Enterprise only
  • Watch out: dynamic tags and the Tag Cloud also wait on Expert, and there's no desktop or phone app

Pick GRC if

  • Fits if you work in Japan and Yahoo rankings are the ones you report on
  • Works for keeping ranking data on your own Windows PC rather than in a web service

Look elsewhere if

  • Skip it if you need Google rankings, as GRC no longer checks them, and Bing was removed
  • Not for you if you're on a Mac or want it in a browser, as it's Windows only
  • Tight if your needs might grow, since a plan can't be changed once its key is issued, and upgrading by paying the difference isn't offered
  • Watch out: each PC or Windows user account needs its own licence, and the site is in Japanese only
  • Watch out: the free edition's item limit isn't stated, and yearly licences are paid by bank transfer

How we grade them

1.8GPAAccuRankerWeak2.0GPAGRCFair
Value for money
DProfessional is $224 a month for 2,000 keywords on yearly billing, $249 monthly. That's past where this category's dearest tenth starts ($139), and there's no smaller plan for one person with one site. The API and Looker Studio wait on Expert at $764.
ABasic is ¥495 a month for 5 URLs and 500 keywords, tax included, or ¥4,950 a year. That's a fraction of what rank trackers usually charge, even counting that it now checks Yahoo only.
Free plan and trial
FNothing free. The pricing page shows no free plan and no trial, just a demo with the sales team, so you pay before you see your own rankings in it.
CA free edition of the same program, with a lower limit on sites and keywords that a paid key raises. The pages read don't say what that limit is.
Features
BDaily updates on every keyword, on-demand refreshes every two hours, SERP features, pixel position, estimated CTR, tags, forecasting and reports, plus YouTube and Baidu. It covers the whole job. AI answer tracking is a separate subscription, AccuLLM, from $206 a month.
DOne-click and scheduled checks, every past position with graphs and notes, competitor and top-site tracking, alerts and CSV export. But it now checks Yahoo only, after Google checks stopped and Bing was removed, so it can't do the job most people want a tracker for.
Ease of use
CNo rating on record. It's built for very long keyword lists, so there are tags, folders and filters to set up before it all reads cleanly.
CNo rating on record. You install it, register sites and keywords and press go, but the site is in Japanese only, and each PC or Windows account needs its own licence.
Platforms and integrations
BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. It links to Search Console, Analytics, Looker Studio, Google Sheets, BigQuery, Databox and Swydo, has an API from Expert, and an MCP server for AI assistants.
DWindows only, with no web, Mac or phone version and no integrations. Standard and up can view another PC's GRC data remotely, but that's as far as it reaches.
Best fordaily rank tracking for agencies with big keyword listsYahoo rank checks on a Windows PC

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: AccuRanker and GRC. How we grade

Where they differ

  • AccuRanker also covers keyword research and AI search visibility.
In commonReportsRank tracking

At a glance

AccuRankerGRC
PricingPaidFree plan
Starts at$224 per month for 2,000 keywords, billed annually ($249 billed monthly)¥495 per month for 5 URLs and 500 keywords, tax included
Free planNoneFree edition with a cap on the number of items (each site, URL and keyword combination); the pages read do not state the cap.
Free trialNone listedNone listed
Web
Windows
Made byAccuRankerShellware (有限会社シェルウェア)
Price read fromaccuranker.comseopro.jp
CheckedOct 23, 2026Oct 23, 2026

Worth knowing

AccuRanker

  • The pricing page shows no free plan or free trial; the vendor offers a demo instead.
  • The smallest plan is 2,000 keywords at $224 a month billed annually, more than many trackers charge to start.
  • Looker Studio and the read API start at Expert ($764 a month); BigQuery and the write API are Enterprise only.
  • AccuLLM is sold separately: $206 a month billed annually ($229 monthly) for 100 prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and AI Mode.

GRC

  • It now checks Yahoo only: its changelog says Google checks were stopped and Bing checks removed because those engines changed.
  • It runs on Windows only, and each PC or Windows user account needs its own license.
  • The site is in Japanese and prices are in yen; monthly licenses are paid by PayPal, yearly ones by bank transfer.
  • A license plan cannot be changed after the key is issued, and upgrades by paying the difference are not offered.

Key features

AccuRanker

Daily rank tracking
Rankings, SERP features and CTR update every day at country or local level, and a keyword or a whole domain can be refreshed on demand every two hours.
Pixel position and CTR
Shows where a result sits in pixels, whether it is above the fold, and the current and maximum CTR for each tracked keyword.
Tagging and filters
Organize thousands of keywords with tags, folders and filters; rule-based dynamic tags and the Tag Cloud start at the Expert plan.
Forecasting and AI metrics
AccuRanker's own AI models estimate CTR and search volume, and a forecasting tool projects the effect of ranking changes.
Reports, API and MCP
Reports and exports on every plan; Looker Studio and an API with unlimited calls from Expert. An MCP server lets AI assistants read the data.
Other search engines
Help guides cover tracking keyword ranks on YouTube and on Baidu as well as on Google.

GRC

One-click and scheduled checks
Check every registered keyword for several sites in one run, or start checks automatically when GRC opens or at a set time.
Full ranking history
Every past position is kept, with a graph per keyword, colored arrows for recent changes and filters for keywords that moved.
Notes on the graph
Record the changes you make to a page, and see the notes on the ranking graph next to the movements that followed.
Competitor and top-site tracking
Follow rival sites, record the daily positions of all the top results for a keyword, and count the ads shown and their order.
Alerts and reports
Ranking alerts and alert emails for important changes, printable ranking reports, and manual CSV export on every plan.

Plans

AccuRanker

  • Professional$224

    per month for 2,000 keywords, billed annually ($249 monthly)

    Daily updates, keyword research, search intent, tagging, filters, GSC and GA, reports and export. 5,000 keywords cost $548 a month billed annually.

  • Expert$764

    per month for 10,000 keywords, billed annually ($849 monthly)

    Adds dynamic tagging, AI CTR, AccuRanker search volume, Looker Studio and an unlimited read API. 25,000 keywords cost $1,412 a month billed annually.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Over 25,000 keywords: BigQuery, unlimited write API, raw SERP HTML, faster updates, unlimited users and domains, and a dedicated CSM.

GRC

  • Free¥0

    The same program with a lower item limit, which a paid license key raises or removes.

  • Basic¥495

    per month for 5 URLs and 500 keywords, tax included

    500 items checked a day and 5 top-site tracking items, without remote viewing. ¥4,950 a year paid by bank transfer.

  • Standard¥990

    per month for 50 URLs and 5,000 keywords, tax included

    50 top-site tracking items and remote viewing of another PC's GRC data. ¥9,900 a year.

  • Expert¥1,485

    per month for 500 URLs and 50,000 keywords, tax included

    500 top-site tracking items and remote viewing. ¥14,850 a year.

  • Pro¥1,980

    per month for 5,000 URLs and 500,000 keywords, tax included

    5,000 top-site tracking items and remote viewing. ¥19,800 a year.

  • Ultimate¥2,475

    per month for unlimited URLs and keywords, tax included

    No limits, plus automatic CSV saving after each check. Memory caps practical use at about 500,000 items. ¥24,750 a year.

Ways to pay less

AccuRanker

  • Annual discount

    10% off with annual billing

    AccuRanker's pricing page gives a 10% discount for paying yearly: Professional is $224 a month billed annually instead of $249 billed monthly.

GRC

  • Annual discount

    Two months free with a yearly license

    GRC's license page prices each yearly license at ten months of the monthly fee, for example ¥4,950 a year for Basic instead of ¥495 a month.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, AccuRanker or GRC?

As of Oct 23, 2026, AccuRanker starts at $224 per month for 2,000 keywords, billed annually ($249 billed monthly), and GRC starts at ¥495 per month for 5 URLs and 500 keywords, tax included.

Which has a free plan, AccuRanker or GRC?

As of Oct 23, 2026, only GRC has a free plan. AccuRanker does not.

Which platforms do AccuRanker and GRC run on?

As of Oct 23, 2026, only AccuRanker lists a web app and only GRC lists a Windows app. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade