Labrika vs Sitechecker (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Sitechecker grades higher than Labrika: 2.2 against 2.0 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Labrika grades higher on value for money. Sitechecker grades higher on the free plan and platforms. They get the same grade on features and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Sitechecker
Site audits, monitoring, rank and AI visibility tracking for agencies
Which one is for you
Pick Labrika if
- Fits if you want a 400-factor technical audit of a site for a few dollars
- Works for agencies that send clients unbranded audit reports as PDF or DOCX
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want to try it first, as there's no free plan or trial, only a 30-day money-back guarantee
- Skip it if you need keyword research or backlink data, as neither is on record
- Tight if you want the writing assistant, change tracker or keyword grouping, which need an audit and rank tracking both paid for
- Watch out: AI Writer credits are sold apart, from $9 for 1,000 to $29 for 10,000, and last 12 months
- Watch out: the bill moves with pages crawled and rank checks run each 30 days, and no integrations are on record
Pick Sitechecker if
- Fits if you look after many client sites and need to know when one breaks
- Works for agencies with many people, since every plan has unlimited users
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you need keyword or backlink research, which it doesn't list
- Tight if you track keywords in several places, as each engine, location, language or device uses another keyword
- Pricey if you want the app under your own brand, which starts at Premium for $375
- Tight if you're on Basic, with 3 websites, weekly rescans and 12 months of data
- Watch out: refunds cover only the first payment within 48 hours, and a failed payment ends access
How we grade them
| 2.0GPALabrikaFair | 2.2GPASitecheckerFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | AStartup is $4 per 30 days for 5,000 page crawls, and 500 rank checks add $3, so both come to $7. That's under 60% of this category's cheaper quarter. Bigger sites pay by volume, and AI Writer credits are extra, from $9 for 1,000. | CBasic is $83 a month on yearly billing ($99 monthly) for 3 websites, 500 keywords and 50 AI prompts. That's toward the dear end of this category's middle, with unlimited users on every plan. |
| Free plan and trial | FNothing free on record: the pricing section lists no free plan or trial, only a 30-day money-back guarantee, which isn't a trial. | CNo free plan, but 14 days of full access free. Refunds only cover the first payment, within 48 hours, so do your testing in the trial. |
| Features | CA 400-factor site audit, rank checks on desktop and mobile, a content optimizer against the top 10, an AI writer, an AI visibility audit and white-label reports. The gap: no keyword research database or backlink analysis is on record. | CSite audits for 300+ issues, change and uptime monitoring, rank tracking on Google, Bing and Yahoo, Search Console dashboards and AI visibility. There's no keyword or backlink research on record, and Basic rescans weekly. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. You build your own plan from crawl and query volumes each 30 days, and some tools only work once both an audit and rank tracking are paid for. | CNo rating on record. You add sites and keywords, then alerts, dashboards and reports for each client take setting up. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only, with no integrations or API on record. Reports leave as PDF or DOCX files or a shared link, and there's no desktop or phone app. | BWeb plus a browser extension, connected to Search Console, GA4, Looker Studio, Sheets, Slack, ChatGPT and Claude, with an API and an MCP server. No desktop or phone app. |
| Best for | pay-as-you-go technical SEO audits | watching many client sites for breakage |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Labrika and Sitechecker. How we grade
Where they differ
- Labrika also covers long-form writing and content optimization.
- Sitechecker also covers dashboards.
At a glance
| Labrika | Sitechecker | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Free trial |
| Starts at | $4 per 30 days for 5,000 page crawls; rank tracking from $3 for 500 queries | $83 per month for 500 keywords, billed annually ($99 billed monthly) |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | 14 days of full access free |
| Web | ||
| Browser extension | ||
| Made by | Labrika Inc. | Cyber Circus Limited |
| Price read from | labrika.com | sitechecker.pro |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Labrika
- The pricing section lists no free plan or free trial, only a 30-day money-back guarantee.
- Audits and rank tracking are priced separately by volume for each 30 days, so the total depends on pages crawled and queries run.
- The AI Writer uses credit packs sold apart from the subscription, from $9 for 1,000 credits to $29 for 10,000, valid for 12 months.
- The SEO Writing Assistant, landing change tracker and keyword grouping need both a site audit and rank tracking.
Sitechecker
- Refunds cover only the first payment, within 48 hours of the subscription starting.
- Each extra search engine, location, language or device for a keyword uses another keyword from the plan's limit.
- Basic rescans sites weekly and keeps 12 months of data; app branding and a custom domain start at Premium.
- Cancelling or a failed payment ends access, and data stops being collected.
Key features
Labrika
- SEO Auditor
- Checks a site against 400+ factors, including 226 technical checks, meta tag and duplicate problems, security and availability from other countries.
- Advanced Rank Checker
- Scheduled or manual ranking checks on desktop and mobile in over 100,000 country and location combinations, with landing pages found and grouped.
- Interactive Content Optimizer
- Compares a page with the top 10 results for its keywords and flags missing terms, TF-IDF gaps, keyword stuffing and title and H1 issues.
- AI Writer
- Writes one-click articles of up to 3,000 words or expert articles of up to 15,000, and rewrites sections, paid for with AI credits.
- AI visibility audit
- Reports what AI assistants say about a site or brand, which competitors they recommend, and prompt and content ideas to appear in their answers.
- White-label reports and tasks
- Full audits export to PDF and DOCX without branding or are shared by link, and fixes can be turned into tasks with their own chat.
Sitechecker
- Site audit
- Crawls sites for more than 300 technical and on-page issues, with JavaScript rendering, unlimited recrawls and how-to-fix guides.
- Website monitoring and alerts
- Watches for content, status code, robots.txt and hreflang changes, removed tracking codes, SSL and domain expiry, with uptime checks every 5 minutes.
- Rank Tracker
- Tracks the top 100 positions in Google, Bing or Yahoo by location, language and device, with SERP history and up to 15 competitors.
- Search Console and GA4 dashboards
- Reports on Search Console data past its 1,000-row export limit, blended GSC and GA4 reports, and SEO tests comparing page versions.
- AI visibility tracking
- Tracks brand mentions and citations on ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Copilot and AI Overviews, plus AI traffic from GA4.
- White label, API and MCP
- White-label PDF reports and app branding, an API across six data sources, and an MCP server for ChatGPT, Claude and Codex.
Plans
Labrika
Startup$4
per 30 days for 5,000 page crawls
Site audit at $0.0008 a page, up to 20,000 pages. Rank tracking is bought on top: 500 queries for $3, at $0.006 each.
Business$18
per 30 days for 30,000 page crawls
Audits at $0.0006 a page, up to 60,000 pages. Rank tracking adds 5,000 queries for $25.02, at about $0.005 each.
E-commerce$35.28
per 30 days for 70,000 page crawls
Audits at about $0.0005 a page, up to 150,000 pages. Rank tracking adds 20,000 queries for $80.40, at about $0.004 each.
Agency$80
per 30 days for 200,000 page crawls
Audits at $0.0004 a page, up to 1 million pages. Rank tracking adds 100,000 queries for $300, at $0.003 each.
Sitechecker
Basic$83
per month for 500 keywords, billed annually ($99 billed monthly)
3 websites, 50 AI prompts, 10,000 crawl pages and weekly monitoring. A larger step with 6 websites and 2,000 keywords costs more.
Standard$208
per month for 2,500 keywords, billed annually ($249 billed monthly)
20 websites, 150 prompts on 5 AI models, 50,000 crawl pages, daily monitoring, Slack alerts and SEO tests. A larger step has 40 sites.
Premium$375
per month for 5,000 keywords, billed annually ($449 billed monthly)
50 websites, 250 prompts, 200,000 crawl pages, checks every 12 hours, and the app white-labeled on your own domain.
EnterpriseCustom
Unlimited websites, keywords and prompts, team training, a dedicated success manager, custom exports and integrations.
Ways to pay less
Labrika
- Annual discount
20% off when paying for six months
The subscription builder on Labrika's homepage offers a 20% discount on a 6-month (180-day) term compared with paying month by month.
Sitechecker
- Annual discount
Two months free with annual billing
Annual billing gives 2 months free: Basic is $83 a month instead of $99, saving $198 a year.
- Education
Free premium access for students of partner schools
Through Sitechecker's educational partnership, schools can give their students free access to premium features during training.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Labrika or Sitechecker?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Labrika starts at $4 per 30 days for 5,000 page crawls; rank tracking from $3 for 500 queries, and Sitechecker starts at $83 per month for 500 keywords, billed annually ($99 billed monthly).
Which has a free plan, Labrika or Sitechecker?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Labrika nor Sitechecker has a free plan. Sitechecker has a free trial.
Which platforms do Labrika and Sitechecker run on?
As of Oct 23, 2026, only Sitechecker lists a browser extension. Both list a web app. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.