Otterly.AI vs SourcePick (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 24, 2026, Otterly.AI grades higher than SourcePick: 2.4 against 2.0 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 and Oct 24, 2026 by ToolGPA
Otterly.AI grades higher on value for money and the free plan. They get the same grade on features, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Otterly.AI
Daily brand and citation tracking across AI search engines
SourcePick
Japanese ChatGPT and AI Overviews tracking with stated error margins
Which one is for you
Pick Otterly.AI if
- Fits if a daily read on ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and Copilot is what you need
- Works for agencies that brand client reports through Looker Studio, from Standard
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if Gemini, AI Mode or Claude matter to you, as they're paid add-ons on every plan, and all seven engines add $227 a month on Standard
- Not for you if you need white-label reports, as there aren't any
- Tight if you start on Lite, with 15 prompts, one workspace, no API or MCP, and no extra prompt packs
- Pricey if you outgrow Lite, as Standard is $160 a month yearly and extra prompts are $99 per 100, with 300 at most before Premium at $422
- Watch out: Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model, and crawler analytics needs server log files you upload
Pick SourcePick if
- Fits if you need AI visibility figures you can defend in an internal report, in Japan
- Works for brands focused on ChatGPT and Google's AI Overviews, with GA4 and Search Console alongside
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you don't read Japanese or are buying as a private person, as it's sold to businesses only
- Skip it if Gemini, Claude or Perplexity matter, as they come only with the quoted Enterprise plan from ¥50,000 a month
- Watch out: only Lite has a trial, capped at 3 runs, and it turns into paid Lite unless you cancel
- Watch out: payments aren't refunded, even if you cancel partway through a month or a year
- Tight if you want to run checks yourself, as Lite has no manual runs and only Business adds one a week
How we grade them
| 2.4GPAOtterly.AIFair | 2.0GPASourcePickFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | BLite is $25 a month billed yearly ($29 monthly) for 15 prompts on four engines with unlimited team members, inside the cheaper quarter of AI visibility tools at $29. The API, MCP and Agent Analytics wait on Standard at $160, and Gemini, AI Mode and Claude cost extra. | CLite is ¥10,800 a month billed yearly, or ¥12,000 monthly, before tax, roughly $72 to $80 at a rough exchange rate, for 20 prompts on 2 engines. That's above this category's $49 middle and under the $95 dearer quarter. |
| Free plan and trial | CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial with 50 prompts and no credit card needed. | DNo free plan. Only Lite has a 14-day trial, capped at 3 runs, and it turns into paid Lite unless you cancel; card payers are charged automatically when it ends. |
| Features | CDaily mentions, share of voice and sentiment per engine in 70+ countries, link citation analysis, prompt research, a GEO audit and crawler analytics. The gap: Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan, and there's no white-label. | CFull answer records, cited domains in 11 types, sentiment by aspect, a margin of error on each figure and before-and-after action logs. The gap the listing names: listed plans track only ChatGPT and AI Overviews. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. You set the prompts to watch, and the crawler analytics means uploading your own server log files. | CNo rating on record. The site and app are in Japanese, and Lite has no manual runs, so you wait for the daily check. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. There's an API, an MCP server and a Looker Studio connector from Standard, plus a link with Semrush. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. It connects Google Analytics 4 and Search Console, and reports save as PDF. |
| Best for | daily brand and citation checks in AI search | AI answer tracking with error margins, in Japan |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Otterly.AI and SourcePick. How we grade
Where they differ
- Otterly.AI also covers site audit.
At a glance
| Otterly.AI | SourcePick | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free trial | Free trial |
| Starts at | $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly) | ¥10,800 per month for 20 prompts, billed annually (¥12,000 billed monthly), before tax |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | 7-day free trial with 50 prompts, no credit card required | 14-day free trial of Lite with up to 3 runs; it moves to paid Lite automatically unless cancelled |
| Web | ||
| Made by | OtterlyAI GmbH | Fairtech Inc. |
| Price read from | otterly.ai | sourcepick.ai |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Otterly.AI
- Google AI Mode and Gemini cost $9, $59 or $149 a month each by plan, and Claude $29, $109 or $439, so all seven engines on Standard add $227 a month.
- Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan; Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model.
- Lite has one workspace; extra prompts are sold in packs of 100 on Standard and Premium only.
- There is no white-label option; the Looker Studio connector is the suggested way to brand client reports.
SourcePick
- The site and app are in Japanese, prices are in yen before tax, and it is sold to businesses and sole proprietors only.
- The listed plans track only ChatGPT and AI Overviews; Gemini, Claude and Perplexity come with a quoted Enterprise plan from ¥50,000 a month.
- Only Lite has a trial, limited to 3 runs; other plans start paid, and switching monthly to annual goes through staff.
- Payments are not refunded, including for cancelling partway through a monthly or annual term.
Key features
Otterly.AI
- Daily prompt monitoring
- Tracks set prompts every day and reports brand mentions, coverage, share of voice and sentiment per engine, in more than 70 countries.
- Link citation analysis
- Shows which URLs and domains each AI engine cites for a prompt, with a domain ranking to find the sources worth targeting.
- AI prompt research
- Suggests prompts customers are likely to ask AI search tools about a brand or topic, as a starting set to monitor.
- GEO audit
- A technical audit of site URLs for generative engine readiness; Lite allows 1,000 audited URLs a month, Premium 10,000.
- Agent Analytics
- Reports AI agent and crawler visits to your site from server log files you upload.
- API, MCP and Looker Studio
- An API and MCP server give programmatic access to the data; the Looker Studio connector comes with Standard and above.
SourcePick
- Answer tracking with full records
- Queries ChatGPT and Japanese-language Google AI Overviews for each question, judging mentions and citations apart and saving every answer, source and run condition.
- Cited source breakdown
- Groups the domains AI cites into 11 types, such as your own site, competitors and comparison sites, and links each figure back to the answers behind it.
- Sentiment by aspect
- Rates how answers describe the brand as positive or negative, broken down by aspects such as product and price.
- Margin of error
- Gives a plus-or-minus margin on the mention rate from the number of runs and engines, so a change can be judged against normal swings.
- Weak prompts and action log
- Lists the weakest questions first, suggests up to 10 actions, and marks the date an action was taken to compare the 4 weeks before and after.
- GA4, Search Console and PDF reports
- Counts AI-referred sessions and conversions from GA4 and shows Search Console data; reports for a chosen period print or save as PDF with the recipient's name.
Plans
Otterly.AI
Lite$25
per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly)
15 prompts tracked daily on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, unlimited team members, one workspace. No API, MCP or extra prompts.
Standard$160
per month, billed yearly ($189 billed monthly)
100 prompts, API, MCP and Agent Analytics. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month, up to 300 more before you must move to Premium.
Premium$422
per month, billed yearly ($489 billed monthly)
400 prompts with everything in Standard. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month.
EnterpriseCustom
From 1,000 prompts, with SSO, custom terms, a quarterly GEO health check and a dedicated success manager.
SourcePick
Lite¥10,800
per month for 20 prompts, billed annually (Â¥12,000 billed monthly)
Before tax. 1 brand, ChatGPT and AI Overviews checked daily, no manual runs, 2 members and email support.
Standard¥18,000
per month for 40 prompts, billed annually (Â¥20,000 billed monthly)
Before tax. Up to 2 brands, ChatGPT and AI Overviews checked daily, 5 members and support over Slack or similar.
Business¥43,200
per month for 100 prompts, billed annually (Â¥48,000 billed monthly)
Before tax. Up to 5 brands, daily checks plus one manual run a week, 10 members and one-to-one support.
Enterprise¥50,000
per month and up, quoted individually
For large companies and agencies, with Gemini, Claude and Perplexity available; the page's estimate for 200 daily prompts is ¥97,000 a month.
Ways to pay less
Otterly.AI
No public discounts listed.
SourcePick
- Annual discount
10% off with annual billing
Annual billing works out at 10% less: Lite is ¥129,600 a year before tax (¥10,800 a month) instead of ¥12,000 a month.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Otterly.AI or SourcePick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI starts at $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly), and SourcePick starts at ¥10,800 per month for 20 prompts, billed annually (¥12,000 billed monthly), before tax.
Which has a free plan, Otterly.AI or SourcePick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Otterly.AI nor SourcePick has a free plan. Both have a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
