Activepieces vs Automatisch (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 12, 2026, we pick Activepieces: it is third in our ranking of automation tools, and it grades higher too, 2.8 against 2.2.
Checked Oct 9, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 · graded Oct 10, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 by ToolGPA
Activepieces grades higher on value for money, features and ease of use. They get the same grade on the free plan and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Activepieces
Open-source automation with flows, AI agents and tables
Which one is for you
Pick Activepieces if
- Fits if you want automation you can read the source of and host yourself
- Works for teams of up to five who want one flat bill instead of one per seat
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want agents on your own servers for free, as the Community edition leaves out agents, chat and MCP
- Pricey if you use AI steps on the dearer models, which cost 10 or 20 credits each without your own AI keys
- Not for you if you need a SOC 2 certificate today, because Activepieces says its program is still in progress
- Tight if you stay on the free cloud plan: 1,000 credits a month, and runs stop until they refresh
- Watch out: Plus to Team is a jump from $16 to $166 a month, SSO starts on Team, and SCIM and audit logs need Ultimate
Pick Automatisch if
- Fits if you are comfortable running Docker and want to own your data
- Works for flows that can wait 15 minutes
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you do not want to run servers, as no hosted price is published
- Not for you if you need instant triggers, as flows run every 15 minutes
- Too light for a long app list: about 70 apps are listed
- Watch out: the encryption and webhook keys must never change or saved connections break
How we grade them
| 2.8GPAActivepiecesGood | 2.2GPAAutomatischFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | BPlus is $16 a month flat on the yearly plan and covers up to 5 users, where most tools here charge from $15 per seat. So five people pay about $3 each. The Team step is steep by comparison, at $166 a month, and AI steps on the pricier models cost 10 or 20 credits each. | C$0, but only if you host it yourself, which needs a server. That is a C, and no hosted price is published. |
| Free plan and trial | BThe free cloud plan gives 5 users 1,000 credits a month with unlimited flows, agents, chat, tables and MCP, and runs just stop until credits refresh. If that's too tight, the self-hosted Community edition is free and unmetered, but it leaves out agents, chat and MCP. | BThe software is free to run on your own servers with Docker. You pay for the server. |
| Features | B762 integrations, a flow builder with branching, retries, subflows and human approvals, inline TypeScript, AI agents, tables, a knowledge base and an MCP server. The whole job, covered, and you can run it air-gapped. It isn't doing anything n8n or Make can't, mind. | CMulti-step flows, webhooks and requests, but just over 70 apps and flows that run at 15-minute intervals, with instant updates only planned. |
| Ease of use | CNo store rating on record, and there's setup in front of you: accounts to connect, a flow to build, and credits to keep an eye on, since AI steps cost 2, 10 or 20 each unless you bring your own AI keys. Chat will draft a flow from a description, which helps. | DSelf-hosting with Docker, Postgres and Redis, and keys that must never change or saved connections break. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no phone or desktop app. It connects through 762 pieces, an HTTP piece for any REST or GraphQL API, API access on every plan and an MCP server for assistants like Claude and Cursor. | BWeb interface, with connections to Slack, Google Sheets, GitHub, HubSpot, Notion, Stripe, Telegram and OpenAI. No desktop or phone app. |
| Best for | open-source automation at a flat price | self-hosted automation for a developer |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Activepieces and Automatisch. How we grade
Price against what you get
Activepieces starts at $16 a month and scores 2.7 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Automatisch has no paid plan and scores 2.0.
Activepieces scores higher, and starts $16 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other automation tools on the chart, 1 scores higher than Activepieces for less, and none scores higher than Automatisch for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- Activepieces also covers databases and AI agents.
- Automatisch also covers no-code.
At a glance
| Activepieces | Automatisch | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan | Free |
| Starts at | $16 / month flat, billed yearly ($20 billed monthly), for up to 5 users | Free |
| Free plan | Cloud Free plan: 1,000 credits a month for up to 5 users, with unlimited flows, agents, chat, tables, MCP and API access. The self-hosted Community Edition is also free and unmetered, but leaves out agents, chat and MCP. | The open-source software is free to run on your own servers; no hosted plan or price is published. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Activepieces | Automatisch |
| Price read from | activepieces.com | automatisch.io |
| Checked | Oct 9, 2026 | Nov 12, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Activepieces
- The Free cloud plan covers up to 5 users and 1,000 credits a month; runs beyond the quota do not go through until credits refresh.
- AI steps cost 2, 10 or 20 credits depending on the model. Connecting your own AI keys, on Plus and above, brings each AI step down to 1 credit.
- The self-hosted Community edition leaves out Agents and Chat and MCPs. SSO starts on Team, and SCIM and audit logs need Ultimate.
- Activepieces says its SOC 2 program is still in progress and that it does not yet hold the certification.
Automatisch
- Self-hosting needs Postgres and Redis, and the encryption and webhook keys must never change or saved connections break.
- The homepage mentions a cloud solution, but no cloud plans or prices are published on the pages we read.
- The docs list a bit over 70 apps, far fewer than the large hosted automation services.
- The docs say flows currently run at 15-minute intervals, with instant updates only planned.
Key features
Activepieces
- Flow builder
- A visual builder with branching, retries, waitpoints, subflows, error handling and human approvals. TypeScript can be written inline for a step that needs code.
- AI agents and chat
- An agent takes a task described in plain words and chooses tools from connected apps and MCP servers, with approval gates on the steps you pick. Chat drafts flows from a description.
- Pieces
- The integration directory lists 762 pieces, all open source under the MIT license. An HTTP piece reaches any REST or GraphQL API that does not have a piece yet.
- Tables and knowledge base
- Tables hold data that every flow and agent can read and write, and a knowledge base makes your documents searchable by agents.
- MCP server
- Tools built in Activepieces can be served over MCP, so assistants such as Claude and Cursor can run them. MCPs are part of the cloud plans, not the Community edition.
- Cloud, self-hosted or air-gapped
- Activepieces Cloud runs in Frankfurt. The same software can be installed on your own infrastructure with Docker or Kubernetes, including with no outbound network.
Automatisch
- Multi-step flows
- A flow is built from a trigger plus later steps, with built-in helper apps such as Filter, Formatter, Delay, Scheduler and HTTP Request.
- Self-hosting
- The installation guide covers Docker Compose and plain Docker, with a main service and a worker service that share one set of environment variables.
- Own your data
- The site says data stays on your own servers, which it pitches at healthcare, finance and European teams bound by GDPR.
- App directory
- The docs list the supported apps, including Slack, Google Sheets, GitHub, HubSpot, Notion, Stripe, Telegram and AI services such as OpenAI and Anthropic.
- Webhooks and requests
- Webhooks and a generic HTTP Request app are in the app list, so services without a dedicated integration can still be reached.
Plans
Activepieces
Free$0
Activepieces Cloud for up to 5 users: 1,000 credits a month, unlimited flows, and agents, chat, tables, MCP and API access. No card needed.
Community$0
Self-hosted open-source edition: credits are not metered and users are unlimited, but Agents and Chat and MCPs are not included.
Plus$16
flat per month, billed yearly ($20 billed monthly)
10,000 credits a month, then $0.007 per credit. Up to 5 users, and you can connect your own AI provider keys.
Team$166
flat per month, billed yearly ($200 billed monthly)
50,000 credits a month, 25 users, unlimited projects, SSO, standard roles, global connections and email support.
UltimateCustom
Yearly credit pool sized to the customer, dedicated workers, execution priority, SCIM, custom roles, Git Sync, audit logs and dedicated support.
EmbedFrom $36k
per year
White-label flow builder, AI agents and the integration library placed inside your own product through one SDK. Sold through sales.
Automatisch
Self-hosted$0
Run Automatisch yourself with Docker Compose or Docker. You provide the servers, Postgres and Redis.
Ways to pay less
Activepieces
- Annual discount
Save 2 months with annual billing
The pricing page's Annual option is labeled as saving 2 months: Plus is $16 a month billed yearly instead of $20, and Team is $166 instead of $200.
Automatisch
No public discounts listed.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Activepieces or Automatisch?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Automatisch is cheaper to start with: it is free, against $16 a month for Activepieces. Activepieces starts at $16 / month flat, billed yearly ($20 billed monthly), for up to 5 users, and Automatisch is free.
Which has a free plan, Activepieces or Automatisch?
As of Nov 12, 2026, both Activepieces and Automatisch have a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
