Skip to content

Haptik vs Landbot (2026): which should you pick?

As of Nov 12, 2026, Landbot grades higher than Haptik: 2.0 against 1.6 out of 4.0.

Checked Oct 18, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 · graded Oct 18, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 by ToolGPA

Haptik grades higher on value for money. Landbot grades higher on the free plan and platforms. They get the same grade on features and ease of use.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

Haptik

Enterprise AI agents for customer service on chat, voice and WhatsApp

Paid

Landbot

No-code chatbot and AI agent builder for websites and WhatsApp

Free plan · from $36/mo

Which one is for you

Pick Haptik if

  • Fits if you are a large company automating customer service chats and calls
  • Works for teams that want AI agents on WhatsApp and voice

Look elsewhere if

  • Skip it if you want a price, because none is published
  • Not for you if you are a small team, as the site says it serves enterprises
  • Watch out: the pricing address redirects to the home page and the way in is a demo
  • Watch out: no free plan or trial is listed, and Haptik is part of Jio Platforms

Pick Landbot if

  • Fits if you want to turn a website form into a chat that qualifies leads
  • Works for teams without developers who want to build bots themselves

Look elsewhere if

  • Pricey if WhatsApp campaigns are the point, as they need Professional WA at $188 a month
  • Not for you if your customers live on Instagram, which isn't one of its channels
  • Tight if your chats spike, as each one past the allowance costs $0.05 and each AI chat $0.10
  • Tight if you stay free: 1 seat, 100 chats a month, web chat only and no AI chats
  • Watch out: the page states Landbot's WhatsApp charge as a flat 20% in one place and €0.05 per message in another

How we grade them

1.6GPAHaptikWeak2.0GPALandbotFair
Value for money
CNo price is published; the site points to a demo request, so it sits at the middle.
DStarter is $36 a month billed yearly for 500 web and Messenger chats, but that only answers people who start a chat. Messaging 1,000 customers means WhatsApp campaigns, which need Professional WA at $188 billed yearly, plus Meta's fees and Landbot's own charge per message.
Free plan and trial
FNo free plan and no trial on the pages read.
CA free plan with 1 seat and 100 chats a month on web chat, with the full builder. No AI chats, and WhatsApp only on a test number. There's also a 14-day trial of the paid plans with no card.
Features
CAI agents by use case, a voice agent, an agent inbox, analytics and knowledge-base training. Aimed at enterprises, with little shown for small teams.
CA bot builder with AI agents, A/B tests, human takeover and CRM links. But campaigns are WhatsApp only and need Professional WA, Instagram isn't a channel, and branding removal and the API wait for Professional.
Ease of use
CNo store rating on record. Agents are trained on your knowledge base and tied into your channels.
CNo App Store rating on record. The work here is building the bot itself, block by block, which templates speed up but don't skip.
Platforms and integrations
CWeb platform only on the pages read; no apps or integrations are listed.
BRuns on the web, with HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Google Sheets, Airtable, Mailchimp, Zapier and Slack. No phone or desktop app, which keeps it off an A.
Best forenterprises running AI agents for customer servicechat-style lead capture on your website

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Haptik and Landbot. How we grade

Where they differ

  • Haptik also covers shared inbox and dashboards.
  • Landbot also covers no-code and live chat.
In commonWebAI support agentWhatsApp messagingChatbots

At a glance

HaptikLandbot
PricingPaidFree plan
Starts atNot published$36 per month for up to 500 chats, billed annually ($45 monthly)
Free planNone1 seat and 100 chats a month on web chat, with the full builder and templates. No AI chats, no API, and WhatsApp only with a test number.
Free trialNone listed14-day free trial of the paid plans, no card required; the account then moves to Free
Web
Made byJio Haptik Technologies LimitedHELLO UMI S.L. (Landbot)
Price read fromNot confirmedlandbot.io
CheckedNov 12, 2026Oct 18, 2026

Worth knowing

Haptik

  • No prices are published; the site points to a demo request and the pricing URL redirects to the homepage.
  • The site targets enterprises; it says it is trusted by 500+ of them.
  • Haptik is part of Jio Platforms, per its about page.

Landbot

  • WhatsApp needs Professional WA or Business. Meta's fee comes on top, plus a Landbot charge the page states as a flat 20% in one place and €0.05 per message in another.
  • Chats past the plan's allowance cost $0.05 each and AI chats past it $0.10 each; the page alerts you at 80% and 90% of the allowance.
  • Branding removal, webhooks, the API and CRM integrations such as HubSpot start at Professional.
  • Extra seats are €25 a month in the comparison table, which gives no dollar figure; annual billing is a 12-month commitment.

Key features

Haptik

AI agents by use case
Separate agents for customer service, sales, booking and lead qualification, plus an agent studio for building your own.
Voice AI agent
Answers phone calls in more than 100 languages, per the site.
Omnichannel agent inbox
Agents follow conversations across channels, and AI hands complex queries to people.
Channels
WhatsApp, voice, RCS Business Messaging, Instagram Direct, Facebook Messenger and web.
Analytics
Custom dashboards and an insights agent for resolution, satisfaction and trends.
Knowledge-base training
Trains agents on PDFs, DOCX, PPTX, CSV files and a website.

Landbot

Visual flow builder
Drag-and-drop editor with templates for lead capture, quizzes, product finders and booking steps, with A/B testing from Starter.
AI agents
AI agents on every paid plan that understand intent and reply in real time, with a monthly AI-chat allowance of 100 to 500 depending on the plan.
WhatsApp bots and campaigns
Bots on your own WhatsApp number and segmented WhatsApp campaigns you can schedule, on Professional WA and Business.
Human takeover
A person can take over a chat with its full history in a shared inbox, on every plan; each person uses a seat.
CRM and app integrations
Mailchimp and Segment from Starter; HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zoho, Google Sheets, Airtable and webhooks from Professional.

Plans

Haptik

Pricing could not be confirmed. See haptik.ai.

Landbot

  • Free$0

    1 seat, 100 chats a month, web chat only, full builder and templates. No AI chats.

  • Starter$36

    per month for up to 500 chats, billed annually ($45 monthly)

    2 seats, 100 AI chats, web and Messenger bots, A/B tests, basic integrations such as Mailchimp. Extra chats cost $0.05 each.

  • Professional$88

    per month for up to 2,500 chats, billed annually ($110 monthly)

    3 seats, 300 AI chats, no Landbot branding, HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, webhooks and live chat support. Extra chats cost $0.05 each.

  • Professional WA$188

    per month for up to 2,500 chats, billed annually ($210 monthly)

    Professional plus one WhatsApp number at $100 a month, and 500 AI chats. Meta's message fees come on top.

  • BusinessCustom

    Contract pricing for custom chat and AI volume, from 5 seats, one WhatsApp number, dedicated support and an uptime SLA.

Ways to pay less

Haptik

No public discounts listed.

Landbot

  • Annual discount

    Save 20% with yearly billing

    Landbot's pricing page says annual billing saves 20%: Starter is $36 a month billed yearly against $45 monthly, Professional $88 against $110.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Haptik or Landbot?

As of Nov 12, 2026, Haptik has no price we could confirm, and Landbot starts at $36 per month for up to 500 chats, billed annually ($45 monthly).

Which has a free plan, Haptik or Landbot?

As of Nov 12, 2026, only Landbot has a free plan. Haptik does not.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade