Inspect Canonical vs Robots Exclusion Checker (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Robots Exclusion Checker grades higher than Inspect Canonical: 3.0 against 2.8 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Robots Exclusion Checker grades higher on features. They get the same grade on value for money, the free plan, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Inspect Canonical
Free Chrome extension that checks a page's canonical tag at a glance
Robots Exclusion Checker
Free Chrome extension that flags robots rules blocking a page
Which one is for you
Pick Inspect Canonical if
- Fits if you check canonicals page by page while browsing a site
- Works for developers confirming canonical tags after a template change
Look elsewhere if
- Too light for on-page checks, as titles, headings and other tags need another extension
- Skip it if you want a site-wide check, since it reports on one page and doesn't crawl
- Not for you if you browse in Firefox, Safari or Edge, as it's listed for Chrome only
- Watch out: the developer hasn't identified itself as a trader, so EU consumer rights don't apply
Pick Robots Exclusion Checker if
- Fits if you need to know why a page isn't being crawled or indexed
- Works for checking at a glance whether a site blocks AI crawlers
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you're not on Chrome, as no other browser is named
- Too light for whole-site audits, since it reports on the URL open in the browser
- Not for you if you want the interface in a language beyond English, German, Spanish and French
- Watch out: the developer hasn't identified itself as a trader, so EU consumer rights don't apply
How we grade them
| 2.8GPAInspect CanonicalGood | 3.0GPARobots Exclusion CheckerVery good | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | AFree from the Chrome Web Store, which lists no in-app purchases, from Nick LeRoy Consulting. | AFree from the Chrome Web Store, with no account and no paid version listed. |
| Free plan and trial | AFree outright: all seven checks and the colour-coded status, with no account and nothing to upgrade to. | AFree outright: all six checks, the user-agent switcher and link highlighting, with nothing to upgrade to. |
| Features | DOne narrow function: the canonical tag and noindex, tested in seven steps with a link to the source or the canonical URL. Titles, headings and every other tag need another tool. | CRobots.txt rules highlighted, meta robots and X-Robots-Tag, canonical mismatch warnings, 14 AI bots from 6 companies, nofollow, ugc and sponsored links, and Googlebot or Bing user-agents. It does indexing checks fully, a smaller job, with no headings or search data. |
| Ease of use | BNo rating on record, but nothing to set up: the icon turns green, amber or red on the page you open. | BNo rating on record, but nothing to set up: the icon turns red, amber or green on the next page you load. |
| Platforms and integrations | CChrome only, so computers only, with no integrations. | CChrome only, so computers only, with no Firefox, Safari or Edge version named and no integrations. |
| Best for | checking a page's canonical tag at a glance | finding what stops a page being indexed |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Inspect Canonical and Robots Exclusion Checker. How we grade
Price against what you get
Inspect Canonical has no paid plan and scores 2.0 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Robots Exclusion Checker has no paid plan and scores 2.3.
Robots Exclusion Checker scores higher for the same starting price. Of the other SEO browser extensions on the chart, none scores higher than Inspect Canonical for less, and none scores higher than Robots Exclusion Checker for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- Inspect Canonical also covers schema markup.
- Robots Exclusion Checker also covers AI search visibility.
At a glance
| Inspect Canonical | Robots Exclusion Checker | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starts at | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Free to install from the Chrome Web Store, which lists no in-app purchases for it. | The whole extension is a free install from the Chrome Web Store, with no account and no paid version listed. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Browser extension | ||
| Made by | Nick LeRoy Consulting LLC | checkrobots.com |
| Price read from | chromewebstore.google.com | chromewebstore.google.com |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Inspect Canonical
- It checks the canonical tag and noindex only; titles, headings and other tags need another tool.
- It reports on the page in front of you and does not crawl a site.
- It is listed for Chrome only.
- The developer has not identified itself as a trader, so EU consumer rights do not apply, as the store listing notes.
Robots Exclusion Checker
- It is listed for Chrome only; the store listing names no Firefox, Safari or Edge version.
- It reports on the URL open in the browser, one page at a time, rather than auditing a whole site.
- The developer has not identified itself as a trader, so EU consumer rights do not apply, as the store listing notes.
- The interface comes in English, German, Spanish and French only.
Key features
Inspect Canonical
- Color-coded status
- Green means the canonical points to the current URL, amber that it points elsewhere, and red that something is wrong.
- Seven checks in order
- Tests for a noindex robots tag, a canonical outside the head, no canonical, several canonicals, a missing href, a different URL, then a correct self-reference.
- Noindex conflicts
- Flags pages carrying a robots noindex tag, since the listing notes canonical tags are then ignored.
- One click to the source
- Each message links to the page source, or to the canonical URL when the tag points to another page.
Robots Exclusion Checker
- Robots.txt rule finder
- When an Allow or Disallow rule affects the current URL, it shows that rule and the full robots.txt with the rule highlighted.
- Meta robots and X-Robots-Tag
- Flags index, noindex, follow and nofollow directives in the HTML and in the HTTP header, and shows the full header with exclusions marked.
- AI bot check
- Checks robots.txt against 14 AI bots from 6 companies, covering training, search indexing and live browsing, and adds an AI label to the icon when any are blocked.
- Canonical mismatch warnings
- Reads canonical tags from the HTML head and the HTTP header and turns the icon amber when the canonical URL differs from the current one.
- Nofollow, UGC and sponsored links
- Optionally highlights links with those rel values on the page, in colors you choose; off by default on new installs.
- Search engine user-agents
- Simulate what Googlebot, Googlebot News, Bing or Yahoo may access, chosen in settings. 404 pages are flagged in red.
Plans
Inspect Canonical
Free$0
All seven canonical checks with color-coded status, free from the Chrome Web Store.
Robots Exclusion Checker
Free$0
All six checks, the user-agent switcher and link highlighting, free from the Chrome Web Store.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Inspect Canonical or Robots Exclusion Checker?
As of Oct 23, 2026, both Inspect Canonical and Robots Exclusion Checker are free to use.
Which has a free plan, Inspect Canonical or Robots Exclusion Checker?
As of Oct 23, 2026, both Inspect Canonical and Robots Exclusion Checker have a free plan.
More comparisons
- Inspect Canonical vs Detailed SEO Extension
- Inspect Canonical vs SEO META in 1 CLICK
- Inspect Canonical vs META SEO inspector
- Inspect Canonical vs SEO Pro Extension
- Robots Exclusion Checker vs Detailed SEO Extension
- Robots Exclusion Checker vs SEOquake
- Robots Exclusion Checker vs META SEO inspector
- Robots Exclusion Checker vs NoFollow
- Robots Exclusion Checker vs Redirect Path
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.