MentionMatch vs Source of Sources (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, MentionMatch and Source of Sources share a 2.8 GPA, both have a free plan, and Source of Sources has no paid plan to buy, against $500 a month for MentionMatch.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
MentionMatch grades higher on features. Source of Sources grades higher on the free plan. They get the same grade on value for money, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
MentionMatch
Free matching of B2B writers with expert sources for quotes
Source of Sources
Free email list of journalist queries looking for expert sources
Which one is for you
Pick MentionMatch if
- Fits if you're a B2B marketer or founder who can supply quotes or data
- Works for B2B writers who need original expert quotes
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you work in consumer or general news, as requests are B2B only
- Tight if deadlines are short, as free sources get requests a day later than API subscribers
- Pricey if you only want requests sooner, as the API that sends them instantly is $500 a month
- Watch out: writers are only encouraged, not required, to link to the sources they quote
- Too light for a steady stream from any one title, as each publication can send at most three requests a week
Pick Source of Sources if
- Fits if you want press mentions and don't want to pay anything
- Works for journalists who need an expert quickly, since posting a query is free
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you want to search or filter queries, as the site describes no search or topic filter
- Too light for PR teams that need a dashboard, tracking or an archive of past queries
- Watch out: one off-topic or salesy reply to a reporter gets you removed, with no appeal
How we grade them
| 2.8GPAMentionMatchGood | 2.8GPASource of SourcesGood | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | AThe service is free for sources and writers, and that's the whole product for most people. The paid API is $500 a month, for agencies and software tools that want requests instantly by webhook. | ACompletely free for sources and journalists, with no paid plan at all. The site asks you to donate to animal charities instead. |
| Free plan and trial | BFree with no cap a normal source would reach. But free requests arrive a day later than API subscribers', who also get Verified Sender Status on replies, so free users answer second. | AEverything is free: up to three emails of queries a day, with no paid tier holding anything back. |
| Features | CRequests matched by expertise, a writer form with approval, links for quotes used, a public page of today's requests and the API feed. It does matching fully, but that's a smaller job, and B2B topics only. | DOne narrow function: an email of queries, up to three times a day. The site describes no dashboard, search or archive of past queries, and no way to filter them by topic. |
| Ease of use | BNo rating on record, but nothing to set up: register as a source, pick your areas and matching requests come by email. | BNo rating on record, but sign-up asks only for a name and email address, and queries land in your inbox. There's nothing to set up. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb and email for everyone. The webhook feed to your own endpoint, Airtable, Notion or Asana comes only with the $500 API. | CEmail only, with no app, integrations or API on record. |
| Best for | free expert quote requests in B2B | free journalist queries by email |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: MentionMatch and Source of Sources. How we grade
Price against what you get
MentionMatch starts at $500 a month and scores 2.3 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Source of Sources has no paid plan and scores 2.0.
MentionMatch scores higher, and starts $500 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other link building tools on the chart, 6 score higher than MentionMatch for less, and none scores higher than Source of Sources for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
At a glance
| MentionMatch | Source of Sources | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan | Free |
| Starts at | $500 per month for the API, billed monthly | Free |
| Free plan | Free for sources to receive matching requests by email and for writers to submit requests; publications can send up to 3 requests a week. | Everything is free: sources get journalist queries by email up to three times a day, and journalists post queries through a web form. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Superpath Incorporated | Jessa and Waffle, LLC |
| Price read from | buy.stripe.com | sourceofsources.com |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
MentionMatch
- Requests cover B2B topics only, such as marketing, SaaS, sales and SEO, not consumer or general news.
- Free sources get requests a day later than API subscribers, who also get Verified Sender Status on replies.
- The API price was read from its Stripe checkout, which showed rupees from India at Stripe's exchange rate.
- Each publication can submit at most three requests a week, and the team approves each one first.
Source of Sources
- Queries arrive only by email; the site describes no dashboard, search or archive of past queries.
- Sign-up asks only for a name and email address, and the site does not describe filtering queries by topic.
- One off-topic or salesy reply to a reporter gets a source removed from the list, with no appeal.
Key features
MentionMatch
- Requests matched by expertise
- Sources pick areas such as marketing, SaaS, sales, SEO, CRO, analytics, AI or ecommerce and receive only requests that match.
- Writer request form
- Writers describe the quotes, anecdotes or data they need; each request is approved first and sent ahead of its deadline, aiming for at least 2 days.
- Links for quotes used
- Writers are encouraged to credit a quote they use with a link to the source's site.
- Today's requests
- A public page lists the current requests, alongside a best-practices guide for answering them.
- API webhook feed
- The paid API sends every request to your own endpoint or to tools such as Airtable, Notion or Asana as it arrives, set up with the team's help.
Source of Sources
- Query emails
- Up to three emails a day collect queries from journalists, broadcasters and bloggers who need an expert to quote.
- Direct replies to reporters
- Sources answer a query by emailing the journalist directly; nothing sits between the two.
- Reporter submission form
- Journalists file a query with its outlet, category and deadline; it goes out in the next mailing, usually within a few hours.
- Verified journalists
- Queries from an outlet's own email domain go out faster; a first query from a personal address is held until the journalist's identity is checked.
- Urgent queries
- A journalist with a deadline under four hours can ask for the query to be posted on Threads straight away.
Plans
MentionMatch
Free$0
Sources get requests matched to their expertise by email; writers submit requests for quotes.
MentionMatch API$500
per month, billed monthly
Requests delivered instantly by webhook rather than a day later, plus Verified Sender Status on replies. Checkout shown in rupees at Stripe's stated rate.
Source of Sources
Free$0
Media query emails up to three times a day for sources; free query submission for journalists.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, MentionMatch or Source of Sources?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Source of Sources is cheaper to start with: it is free, against $500 a month for MentionMatch. MentionMatch starts at $500 per month for the API, billed monthly, and Source of Sources is free.
Which has a free plan, MentionMatch or Source of Sources?
As of Oct 23, 2026, both MentionMatch and Source of Sources have a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
