WebPageTest vs Yellow Lab Tools (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Yellow Lab Tools grades higher than WebPageTest: 3.2 against 2.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Yellow Lab Tools grades higher on value for money, the free plan and platforms. They get the same grade on features and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
WebPageTest
Page speed tests from real browsers in locations around the world
Yellow Lab Tools
Free open-source audit of a page's speed and front-end code
Which one is for you
Pick WebPageTest if
- Fits if you need to see how a page loads in a given browser from a given city
- Works for checking a fix's effect side by side before you change the site, on Pro
Look elsewhere if
- Watch out: every page load counts as a run, so 5 runs with repeat views use 10 of your 150
- Tight if you stay on Starter, with 3 runs per test and no scheduled tests, alerts, API or Experiments
- Not for you if you want to try Pro first, as there's no free trial
- Too light for bigger teams, as a Pro account holds up to 5 members
Pick Yellow Lab Tools if
- Fits if you're a front-end developer tracing what makes one page heavy or slow
- Works for testing pages on localhost or an intranet through a private copy
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you need a whole site checked, as each run tests one page address
- Not for you if you want ongoing monitoring, since no scheduled tests are described
- Watch out: the public site processes one run at a time, so a test can wait behind others
- Tight if you self-host on Windows, which the author says is untested; Linux and macOS are documented
- Watch out: under GPL-2.0, changes to a hosted copy's code must be published under the same license
How we grade them
| 2.6GPAWebPageTestGood | 3.2GPAYellow Lab ToolsVery good | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | BPro is $180 a year for 1,000 test runs a month, $15 a month, inside this category's cheaper quarter, and it holds up to 5 users. Monthly billing is $18.75; 5,000 runs are $840 a year. | AFree under the GPL-2.0 license: the public website, its REST API, the npm command-line tool and the server code. There's no paid plan; the author takes donations through GitHub or Ko-fi. |
| Free plan and trial | BThe free Starter plan gives 150 test runs a month, 30 locations, Lighthouse, filmstrip, video, Opportunities, 3-step scripts and 60 days of history. Enough for one person testing now and then, though repeat views double the count. | AEvery part is free, with no paid tier on record. The catch is the public instance, which processes one run at a time, so a test can wait in a queue. |
| Features | CReal-browser tests over connections from 3G to fiber, Lighthouse, filmstrips and Opportunities, with scheduled tests, alerts, Smartboards and Experiments on Pro. It does lab speed testing fully, but that's a smaller job, with no real user data on record. | CA score out of 100 and a grade per rule across network, images, DOM, JavaScript, CSS, fonts and server config, with the offending files listed. It does a one-page front-end audit fully, but that's a smaller job, with no site-wide crawl or monitoring described. |
| Ease of use | BNo rating on record. A test is a page address, a location and a browser, with nothing to install or connect first. | BNo rating on record. On the public site you give it a page address and a device type and wait for the report. Running your own copy is another matter: it needs Node.js, documented for Linux and macOS only. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only, with no integrations on record; the API comes only with Pro. No desktop or phone app. | BWeb, with a public REST API that returns JSON, plus an npm command-line tool and a server you can run on Mac or Linux. No phone app, and no integrations on record. |
| Best for | real-browser page speed tests worldwide | auditing one page's front-end code for free |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: WebPageTest and Yellow Lab Tools. How we grade
Price against what you get
WebPageTest starts at $15 a month when paid by the year and scores 2.3 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Yellow Lab Tools has no paid plan and scores 2.7.
Yellow Lab Tools scores higher and starts $15 a month lower. Of the other technical SEO tools on the chart, 5 score higher than WebPageTest for less, and none scores higher than Yellow Lab Tools for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- Yellow Lab Tools is open source and self-hostable, according to its own site.
- WebPageTest also covers dashboards.
At a glance
| WebPageTest | Yellow Lab Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan | Free |
| Starts at | $180 per year for 1,000 test runs a month ($18.75 billed monthly) | Free |
| Free plan | Starter plan: 150 test runs a month (up to 3 per test), 30 test locations, Lighthouse, filmstrip and video, Opportunities, 3-step scripts and 60 days of history. | Entirely free: the public website, the API, the command-line tool and the self-hosted server, with donations through GitHub or Ko-fi. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| macOS | ||
| Linux | ||
| Made by | LogicMonitor | Gaël Métais |
| Price read from | logicmonitor.com | yellowlab.tools |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
WebPageTest
- Every page load counts as a test run: 5 runs with first and repeat views use 10 of the monthly allowance.
- Starter allows 150 runs a month and 3 runs per test; scheduled tests, alerts, the API and Experiments need Pro.
- There is no free trial of Pro, and a Pro account holds up to 5 team members.
- The webpagetest.org site answered with a bot check; prices were read on LogicMonitor's WebPageTest pricing page.
Yellow Lab Tools
- Each run tests one page address; the documentation describes no site-wide crawl or scheduled monitoring.
- The public instance queues runs and processes one at a time, so a test can wait behind others.
- Self-hosting needs Node.js and is documented for Linux and macOS; the author says Windows is untested.
- Under the GPL-2.0 license, changes to the code of a hosted copy must be published under the same license.
Key features
WebPageTest
- Real-browser tests
- Test in Chrome (stable, beta and canary), Firefox (stable, beta and ESR), Edge and Brave, on desktop or mobile, over connection speeds from 3G to fiber.
- Global test locations
- Starter runs tests from 30 locations across six continents; Pro adds more, including many more US cities.
- Lighthouse, filmstrip and video
- Each test can include a Lighthouse run, a filmstrip and a video of the page loading, on every plan.
- Opportunities
- Recommendations grouped under quickness, usability and resilience, with tips on what to fix. Available to all users.
- Experiments
- Pro runs a proposed optimization side by side with a control test in a sandbox, so its effect shows without changing the site's code.
- Scheduled tests and alerts
- Pro schedules tests, sends custom alerts, builds Smartboards dashboards and keeps 13 months of history, with API, private and bulk testing.
Yellow Lab Tools
- Scored page audit
- Gives a global score out of 100 and a grade per rule, grouped as network, images, DOM, JavaScript, jQuery, CSS, web fonts and server config.
- Offenders and score gain
- Each rule lists the files, selectors or functions at fault and says how many points the global score would gain if it were fixed.
- Device and access settings
- Simulates a phone, tablet or desktop, and can send cookies, basic HTTP login details or a proxy, or block and allow chosen domains.
- Public API
- A REST API on yellowlab.tools queues runs, reports their status and returns the full JSON result or parts of it, with CORS allowed.
- Command line and Node module
- Installed from npm, the yellowlabtools command tests a page and prints the result as JSON or XML, with an optional screenshot.
- Private server
- The server code can be installed on your own machine or run from a community Docker image, for testing pages on localhost or an intranet.
Plans
WebPageTest
Starter$0
150 test runs a month, up to 3 runs per test, 30 locations, Lighthouse, Opportunities and 60 days of test history.
Pro 1,000 runs$180
per year for 1,000 test runs a month ($18.75 billed monthly)
Scheduled tests, alerts, Smartboards, API access, Experiments, private and bulk tests, more locations, 13 months of history and up to 5 users.
Pro 5,000 runs$840
per year for 5,000 test runs a month ($87.50 billed monthly)
The same Pro features with a larger monthly allowance of test runs.
Pro 10,000 runs$1,620
per year for 10,000 test runs a month ($168.75 billed monthly)
The same Pro features with 10,000 test runs a month.
Pro 20,000 runs$3,000
per year for 20,000 test runs a month ($312.50 billed monthly)
The largest listed Pro allowance, with 20,000 test runs a month.
Yellow Lab Tools
Free$0
The public instance at yellowlab.tools, its REST API, the npm command-line tool and the open-source server.
Ways to pay less
WebPageTest
- Annual discount
Save 20% with annual billing
Pro with 1,000 runs a month is $180 a year billed annually, against $18.75 a month billed monthly; the pricing page lists a 20% saving.
Yellow Lab Tools
No public discounts listed.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, WebPageTest or Yellow Lab Tools?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Yellow Lab Tools is cheaper to start with: it is free, against $15 a month when paid by the year for WebPageTest. WebPageTest starts at $180 per year for 1,000 test runs a month ($18.75 billed monthly), and Yellow Lab Tools is free.
Which has a free plan, WebPageTest or Yellow Lab Tools?
As of Oct 23, 2026, both WebPageTest and Yellow Lab Tools have a free plan.
Which platforms do WebPageTest and Yellow Lab Tools run on?
As of Oct 23, 2026, only Yellow Lab Tools lists macOS and Linux apps. Both list a web app. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.