Google Rich Results Test vs TechnicalSEO.com Tools (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 12, 2026, Google Rich Results Test grades higher than TechnicalSEO.com Tools: 2.8 against 2.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 and Nov 12, 2026 by ToolGPA
Google Rich Results Test grades higher on value for money and the free plan. TechnicalSEO.com Tools grades higher on features. They get the same grade on ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Google Rich Results Test
Free Google check of which rich results a page's structured data earns
TechnicalSEO.com Tools
Browser-based testers for robots.txt, hreflang, rendering and schema
Which one is for you
Pick Google Rich Results Test if
- Fits if you're checking structured data before a page goes live
- Works for finding out why a rich result stopped showing for a page
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you need general schema.org checks, as it only knows Google's rich result types
- Not for you if the page is behind a login, firewall or robots.txt block, unless you paste the code or use a tunnel
- Watch out: passing the test doesn't mean Google will show the rich result, as it picks layouts per search
- Watch out: shared links and saved history last about 90 days, and anyone with the link can open them
Pick TechnicalSEO.com Tools if
- Fits if you want a quick one-off check on a robots.txt or hreflang tag
- Works for people who already crawl with another tool and need a tester for one problem
Look elsewhere if
- Too light for ongoing audits, as there is no crawler or monitor
- Skip it if you want alerts or history, because each tester gives one result at a time
- Watch out: the site publishes no pricing or terms for the tools, so their future cost is unknown
- Not for you if you want an app or an API, as it is web only
How we grade them
| 2.8GPAGoogle Rich Results TestGood | 2.6GPATechnicalSEO.com ToolsGood | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | AFree, from Google, with URL and code tests, search previews and shareable results. Nothing to buy. | BListed as free with no price shown, so there is nothing to compare against the category's $13 cheaper quarter. We hold it at B because the site gives no pricing page to confirm that. |
| Free plan and trial | AOpen to anyone in a browser with no account, as often as you like. | BThe tools are listed as free to use with no sign-up on the pages we read, but the site states no plan or limits either way. |
| Features | DOne narrow job: rich result eligibility for the types Google supports, with crawl checks, previews and a code explorer. For general schema.org checks Google points you to the Schema Markup Validator. | CSeparate testers for crawling, rendering, mobile, international and local checks. They are single-purpose tools, not a site-wide crawler or monitor. |
| Ease of use | BNo rating on record, and nothing to set up: enter a URL or paste code and run it. Clicking an error opens the source at that line. | BNo store rating on record. You paste a URL into a tester and read the result, with nothing to set up. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only, linked to Google Search Console, with no API on record. | CWeb only, with no apps, API or integrations listed. |
| Best for | checking a page qualifies for Google rich results | one-off checks of robots.txt, hreflang and schema |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Google Rich Results Test and TechnicalSEO.com Tools. How we grade
Price against what you get
Google Rich Results Test has no paid plan and scores 2.0 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. TechnicalSEO.com Tools has no paid plan and scores 2.3.
TechnicalSEO.com Tools scores higher for the same starting price. Of the other technical SEO tools on the chart, none scores higher than Google Rich Results Test for less, and none scores higher than TechnicalSEO.com Tools for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
At a glance
| Google Rich Results Test | TechnicalSEO.com Tools | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starts at | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Open to anyone in a browser with no account: test any public URL or a code snippet as often as you like, and share results by link for about 90 days. | None |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Merkle Inc. | |
| Price read from | search.google.com | Not confirmed |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Nov 12, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Google Rich Results Test
- Checks only the rich result types Google Search supports; Google points to the Schema Markup Validator for general schema.org checks.
- Pages behind a firewall or login, or blocked by robots.txt, cannot be tested by URL; you need a tunnel or a code snippet.
- A passing test does not guarantee a rich result: Google says it chooses result layouts per search.
- Shared results links and saved test history last only about 90 days, and anyone with a bookmark can open it.
TechnicalSEO.com Tools
- The site publishes no pricing or plan information, so cost could not be confirmed.
- These are separate single-purpose testers, not a site-wide crawler or monitor.
- The site footer credits Merkle Inc. and the developer Max Prin.
Key features
Google Rich Results Test
- Test a URL or a code snippet
- Enter a public URL, or paste code and edit and rerun it as often as needed; JSON-LD, RDFa and Microdata are supported.
- Rich result detection
- Lists the rich result types found, such as Article, Breadcrumb, Event, Job posting, Product snippet, Recipe and Review snippet, with each item's errors and warnings.
- Crawl checks
- Reports whether Google could crawl and fetch the page, whether robots.txt allows it, and which page resources failed to load.
- Search result preview
- For some rich result types, shows how the result might look in Google Search on desktop and mobile.
- Code explorer
- Clicking an error opens the rendered source at the line in question.
- Shareable results and history
- Share a results link that anyone can open, and bookmark runs to keep a test history, each kept for about 90 days.
TechnicalSEO.com Tools
- Crawling tools
- Includes a robots.txt tester, an AI bot access tester, an .htaccess tester, a sitemap generator and an RSS feed parser.
- Rendering tools
- A fetch and render tool and a pre-rendering tester for checking how a page is served to crawlers.
- Mobile SEO
- A mobile-first index tool, a mobile-friendly test and a bulk AMP validator.
- International SEO
- An hreflang tags tester and a locale-adaptive tester.
- Local and SERP tools
- A local search tool, a review link generator, a SERP simulator, a knowledge graph tool and a schema generator.
- Reference docs
- Short guides to the robots.txt file, hreflang and rel="canonical", plus a page on algorithm updates.
Plans
Google Rich Results Test
Free$0
URL and code tests for JSON-LD, RDFa and Microdata, smartphone or desktop crawler, previews and shareable results.
TechnicalSEO.com Tools
Pricing could not be confirmed. See technicalseo.com.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Google Rich Results Test or TechnicalSEO.com Tools?
As of Nov 12, 2026, both Google Rich Results Test and TechnicalSEO.com Tools are free to use.
Which has a free plan, Google Rich Results Test or TechnicalSEO.com Tools?
As of Nov 12, 2026, both Google Rich Results Test and TechnicalSEO.com Tools have a free plan.
More comparisons
- Google Rich Results Test vs Schema Markup Validator
- Google Rich Results Test vs Google Search Console
- Google Rich Results Test vs Schema App
- Google Rich Results Test vs Schemantra
- Google Rich Results Test vs Schema.dev
- TechnicalSEO.com Tools vs Hreflang Tags Testing Tool
- TechnicalSEO.com Tools vs Schema Markup Validator
- TechnicalSEO.com Tools vs Google Search Console
- TechnicalSEO.com Tools vs SEO Site Checkup
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
