Skip to content

GPT Researcher vs Manus (2026): which should you pick?

As of Nov 13, 2026, we pick Manus: it is first in our ranking of AI agents, and it grades higher too, 3.2 against 2.0.

Checked Oct 5, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 · graded Oct 10, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA

GPT Researcher grades higher on the free plan. Manus grades higher on features, ease of use and platforms. They get the same grade on value for money.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

GPT Researcher

Open source research agent that writes cited reports

Free

Manus

General AI agent for research, slides, websites and browser tasks

Free plan · from $20/mo

Which one is for you

Pick GPT Researcher if

  • Fits if you can run Python or Docker and want cited research reports
  • Works for developers who want to choose their own search sources and models

Look elsewhere if

  • Not for you if you want a hosted service, since there is none
  • Skip it if you do not want a command line, as setup needs Python 3.11 or newer or Docker
  • Watch out: you pay your LLM and search providers directly
  • Too light on support: managed deployments and SLAs are by contacting the maintainers, with no price

Pick Manus if

  • Fits if you want to hand over a research job and get a finished report back
  • Works for teams that want one shared pot of credits and a view of who used what

Look elsewhere if

  • Tight if you're staying free, with one task at a time, 2 scheduled tasks and only the Lite model for agent work
  • Skip it if metered plans annoy you, because unused monthly credits don't roll over
  • Not for you if you want a desktop app on Linux or an Intel Mac, as only Apple Silicon and Windows downloads are listed
  • Watch out: the pricing page lists a 40,000-credit Pro tier, but the help center states prices only for the first two
  • Pricey if you need SSO on a small team, at a flat $150 below 30 seats

How we grade them

2.0GPAGPT ResearcherFair3.2GPAManusVery good
Value for money
CThe software costs nothing, but there is no hosted service, so you host it yourself and pay LLM and search providers, a few cents to a few dollars per deep run.
CPro starts at $20 a month for 4,000 credits, which is mid-table for this category, and $40 buys 8,000. Paying yearly takes 17% off. Unused monthly credits don't roll over, so a quiet month is money gone.
Free plan and trial
BFree and MIT licensed, with free retrievers like DuckDuckGo and SearXNG. The model calls are not free.
CFree refreshes 300 credits a day, up to 1,500 a month, which sounds fine until the rest: one task at a time, 2 scheduled tasks, and only the Manus 2.0 Lite model does agent work. The $40 Pro tier has a 7-day trial.
Features
CPlanner, parallel researchers, many retrievers, your own files, deep research mode, MCP server and API. Managed deployments and SLAs are by contact only.
ATwo things the other agents here don't offer: Wide Research splits one job across many agents at once, and Browser Operator works inside your own logged-in browser tabs. On top of that, tasks run in a cloud computer that browses, handles files and runs code, and it builds full-stack web apps with a login.
Ease of use
DNo store rating on record. Python 3.11 or newer or Docker, keys and a command line are needed.
A4.7 from about 38,700 App Store ratings. You type a goal and it gets on with it. The part you'll have to learn is the credits.
Platforms and integrations
CRuns on Linux, Mac and Windows as a program, with an API and MCP server. No web service or phone app.
AWeb, Mac, Windows, iPhone, Android and a Chrome extension, with connectors for Gmail, Notion, Slack, Google Calendar and GitHub and a public API. No Linux app is listed.
Best foropen-source research agenthanding over a goal and getting finished work back

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: GPT Researcher and Manus. How we grade

Price against what you get

GPT Researcher has no paid plan and scores 1.7 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Manus starts at $20 a month and scores 4.0.

Manus scores higher, and starts $20 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other AI agents on the chart, none scores higher than GPT Researcher for less, and none scores higher than Manus for less.

Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged

D1.0C2.0B3.0A4.0Free$5$10$20$50$100$200$500$1k$2k$5kMore for lessCosts more, scores moreCosts less, scores lessCosts more, scores lessGPT ResearcherManus

What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →

  • The best score at each price
  • Has a free plan
  • No free plan
The full chart of AI agents, and the best at every price

Where they differ

  • GPT Researcher is open source and self-hostable, according to its own site.
  • GPT Researcher also covers citations.
  • Manus also covers app builder and presentations.
In commonFree planmacOSWindowsPublic APIAI agentsResearch

At a glance

GPT ResearcherManus
PricingFreeFree plan
Starts atFree$20 per month, billed monthly (Pro with 4,000 credits)
Free planNone300 refresh credits a day, capped at 1,500 a month, with 1 concurrent task, 2 scheduled tasks, Chat Mode and only the Manus 2.0 Lite model in Agent Mode.
Free trialNone listed7-day free trial on the $40 per month Pro tier, according to Manus's help center
Web
macOS
Windows
Linux
iOS
Android
Browser extension
Made byGPT ResearcherManus AI (Butterfly Effect Pte. Ltd.)
Price read fromgptr.devhelp.manus.im
CheckedNov 13, 2026Oct 5, 2026

Worth knowing

GPT Researcher

  • There is no hosted service; you run it yourself with Python 3.11 or newer, or Docker.
  • You pay your LLM and search providers directly; the site gives a few cents to a few dollars per deep run as a ballpark.
  • Managed deployments, private-corpus retrievers and SLAs are handled by contacting the maintainers, with no listed price.

Manus

  • Usage is metered in credits, and unused monthly credits do not roll over to the next cycle.
  • Free accounts are limited to the Manus 2.0 Lite model in Agent Mode, 1 concurrent task and 1,500 daily-refresh credits a month.
  • The pricing page lists Pro tiers of 4,000, 8,000 and 40,000 credits a month; the help center states prices only for the first two.
  • The macOS desktop download is labeled for Apple Silicon, and no Linux app is listed.

Key features

GPT Researcher

Planner and parallel researchers
A planner splits a question into sub-questions and runs a researcher on each at the same time before a writer drafts the report.
Many retrievers and your own files
The site lists 20+ retrievers, including Tavily, Google, Bing, Exa, arXiv and PubMed, which can be combined with MCP servers or local documents.
Cited reports
Each claim in the report is tied to a numbered source. Reports can be output as markdown, PDF, docx or plain text.
Deep research mode
Findings seed new questions, so a run explores a tree of subtopics instead of a single pass. Depth is configurable.
MCP server and API
The official gptr-mcp server exposes research tools to Claude, Cursor, n8n and other MCP clients, and a FastAPI server can be run from the repository.

Manus

Agent Mode
Tasks run in a cloud virtual machine that handles file operations, browser automation and code execution. Credits are consumed only while a task is actively processing.
Wide Research
Splits a large research job across many agents working in parallel and returns reports and datasets. The pricing page lists it among the paid Pro features.
Slides, websites and web apps
Generates slide decks from a prompt and builds full-stack web apps with a built-in database, backend and login, which can be deployed and connected to a custom domain.
Browser Operator
A Chrome extension that lets Manus work inside your own browser session, using your existing logins and open tabs once you grant it access.
Scheduled and concurrent tasks
Tasks can run on a schedule and side by side: 2 scheduled tasks and 1 concurrent task on the free plan, 20 of each on Pro.
Connectors and API
Connects to apps such as Gmail, Notion, Slack, Google Calendar and GitHub. A public API can create tasks, send follow-up messages and retrieve results.

Plans

GPT Researcher

  • Open Source$0

    MIT-licensed Python package and MCP server that you host yourself; you pay your own LLM and search API providers.

Manus

  • Free$0

    300 daily refresh credits (1,500 a month at most), 1 concurrent task, 2 scheduled tasks, and only the Manus 2.0 Lite model in Agent Mode.

  • ProFrom $20

    per month, billed monthly; 17% less when billed annually

    4,000 credits a month at $20 or 8,000 at $40, plus daily credits, 20 concurrent tasks, 20 scheduled tasks and all Manus 2.0 models.

  • TeamFrom $20

    per seat / month, billed monthly; 17% less when billed annually

    Everything in Pro, plus a shared credit pool, usage analytics, access control and a training-data opt-out. SSO costs a flat $150 below 30 seats and is free from 30.

Ways to pay less

GPT Researcher

No public discounts listed.

Manus

  • Annual discount

    Save 17% with annual billing

    The pricing page's billing toggle shows a 17% saving when Pro is billed annually, and the help center lists the same discount for the Team plan.

  • Startups

    Manus for Startups: 6 months of Team

    Eligible startups get 6 months of the Team plan for up to 20 seats, which Manus values at $4,800. Open applications are paused; new ones come through partner VC referrals.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, GPT Researcher or Manus?

As of Nov 13, 2026, GPT Researcher is cheaper to start with: it is free, against $20 a month for Manus. GPT Researcher is free, and Manus starts at $20 per month, billed monthly (Pro with 4,000 credits).

Which has a free plan, GPT Researcher or Manus?

As of Nov 13, 2026, both GPT Researcher and Manus have a free plan.

Which platforms do GPT Researcher and Manus run on?

As of Nov 13, 2026, only GPT Researcher lists a Linux app and only Manus lists a web app, iOS and Android apps and a browser extension. Both list macOS and Windows apps. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade