Skip to content

Dust vs GPT Researcher (2026): which should you pick?

As of Nov 13, 2026, Dust grades higher than GPT Researcher: 2.2 against 2.0 out of 4.0.

Checked Oct 5, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 · graded Oct 10, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA

Dust grades higher on ease of use and platforms. GPT Researcher grades higher on the free plan. They get the same grade on value for money and features.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

Dust

Platform for building AI agents on your company's knowledge

Free trial · from $24/mo

GPT Researcher

Open source research agent that writes cited reports

Free

Which one is for you

Pick Dust if

  • Fits if your company wants agents that answer from its own docs and chats
  • Works for organizations that need their data kept in the US or the EU

Look elsewhere if

  • Tight if you're staying free, as the Free seat is 500 credits once and never refills
  • Not for you if you need more than 3 data sources, 5 MCP servers or 5 spaces without an Enterprise deal
  • Skip it if you need audit logs, SCIM or custom data retention, which sit on the custom-priced Enterprise plan
  • Pricey if heavy users need Max, at $120 a seat a month billed yearly or $150 monthly
  • Watch out: credits don't roll over, prices exclude VAT, and there's no phone or desktop app

Pick GPT Researcher if

  • Fits if you can run Python or Docker and want cited research reports
  • Works for developers who want to choose their own search sources and models

Look elsewhere if

  • Not for you if you want a hosted service, since there is none
  • Skip it if you do not want a command line, as setup needs Python 3.11 or newer or Docker
  • Watch out: you pay your LLM and search providers directly
  • Too light on support: managed deployments and SLAs are by contacting the maintainers, with no price

How we grade them

2.2GPADustFair2.0GPAGPT ResearcherFair
Value for money
CPro is $24 a seat each month billed yearly, or $30 monthly, with 8,000 credits a seat. That's the middle of the road for agent tools here. No model is locked behind a dearer plan, but credits don't roll over and the prices exclude VAT.
CThe software costs nothing, but there is no hosted service, so you host it yourself and pay LLM and search providers, a few cents to a few dollars per deep run.
Free plan and trial
CThe Free seat is 500 credits for the life of the seat, with no monthly refill, and then it asks you to upgrade. So it's a trial with no clock on it rather than a plan anyone stays on.
BFree and MIT licensed, with free retrievers like DuckDuckGo and SearXNG. The model calls are not free.
Features
CAgents answering from your Slack, Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce and Zendesk, any of 20-plus models each, schedules and triggers, permissions split by team and Frames turning answers into shared dashboards. The cap is the catch: the self-serve plan allows 3 data connectors, 5 MCP servers and 5 spaces.
CPlanner, parallel researchers, many retrievers, your own files, deep research mode, MCP server and API. Managed deployments and SLAs are by contact only.
Ease of use
CPeople ask an agent in Slack or a Chrome sidebar. Someone has to connect the company's data, set the permissions and build the agents first, and there's no rating on record.
DNo store rating on record. Python 3.11 or newer or Docker, keys and a command line are needed.
Platforms and integrations
BA web app, Slack and a Chrome extension, with Zapier, Make, n8n and Power Automate listed and a developer API. No phone or desktop app on the listing.
CRuns on Linux, Mac and Windows as a program, with an API and MCP server. No web service or phone app.
Best forcompany agents that know your own docs and chatsopen-source research agent

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Dust and GPT Researcher. How we grade

Price against what you get

Dust starts at $24 a month for each person and scores 2.3 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. GPT Researcher has no paid plan and scores 1.7.

Dust scores higher, and starts $24 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other AI agents on the chart, 20 score higher than Dust for less, and none scores higher than GPT Researcher for less.

Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged

D1.0C2.0B3.0A4.0Free$5$10$20$50$100$200$500$1k$2k$5kMore for lessCosts more, scores moreCosts less, scores lessCosts more, scores lessDustGPT Researcher

What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →

  • The best score at each price
  • Has a free plan
  • No free plan
The full chart of AI agents, and the best at every price

Where they differ

  • GPT Researcher is open source and self-hostable, according to its own site.
  • Dust also covers AI search and workflow automation.
  • GPT Researcher also covers research and citations.
In commonPublic APIAI agents

At a glance

DustGPT Researcher
PricingFree trialFree
Starts at$24 per seat / month, billed yearly (Pro)Free
Free planNoneNone
Free trialFree seat with a one-time 500 credits for the lifetime of the seat and no time limitNone listed
Web
macOS
Windows
Linux
Browser extension
Made byDustGPT Researcher
Price read fromdust.ttgptr.dev
CheckedOct 5, 2026Nov 13, 2026

Worth knowing

Dust

  • The Free seat is a one-time allowance of 500 credits, not a monthly quota; once it is used, free users are prompted to request an upgrade.
  • The self-serve Business plan covers teams of up to 100 and is limited to 3 data source connectors, 5 remote MCP servers and 5 spaces.
  • SCIM provisioning, audit logs, custom data retention and single-tenant deployment require Enterprise.
  • Monthly credits reset each billing period without rolling over, and listed prices exclude VAT.

GPT Researcher

  • There is no hosted service; you run it yourself with Python 3.11 or newer, or Docker.
  • You pay your LLM and search providers directly; the site gives a few cents to a few dollars per deep run as a ballpark.
  • Managed deployments, private-corpus retrievers and SLAs are handled by contacting the maintainers, with no listed price.

Key features

Dust

Agents with company context
Agents draw on connected company data from sources such as Slack, Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce and Zendesk to answer questions and take action.
Model choice per agent
All plans include 20+ models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral and DeepSeek. The model is chosen per agent, and none is locked to a higher plan.
Schedules and triggers
Multi-agent workflows can run on a schedule or in response to events. Dust also lists Zapier, Make, n8n and Power Automate as supported automation platforms.
Spaces and permissions
Spaces segment data by team, and a two-layer permission model separates what agents can access from who can use them. The Business plan includes 5 spaces.
Frames
Frames turn agent output into interactive dashboards, reports and memos that a team can explore and work on together.
Slack and Chrome extension
Agents can be mentioned in any Slack channel or messaged directly, and a Chrome extension opens them in a sidebar on any web page.

GPT Researcher

Planner and parallel researchers
A planner splits a question into sub-questions and runs a researcher on each at the same time before a writer drafts the report.
Many retrievers and your own files
The site lists 20+ retrievers, including Tavily, Google, Bing, Exa, arXiv and PubMed, which can be combined with MCP servers or local documents.
Cited reports
Each claim in the report is tied to a numbered source. Reports can be output as markdown, PDF, docx or plain text.
Deep research mode
Findings seed new questions, so a run explores a tree of subtopics instead of a single pass. Depth is configurable.
MCP server and API
The official gptr-mcp server exposes research tools to Claude, Cursor, n8n and other MCP clients, and a FastAPI server can be run from the repository.

Plans

Dust

  • Free$0

    A Business-plan seat with 500 credits for its lifetime and no monthly refill, meant for occasional users or people trying Dust.

  • Pro$24

    per seat / month, billed yearly; $30 billed monthly

    8,000 credits per seat each month on the Business plan, which covers teams of up to 100, with SSO available on request from 5 seats.

  • Max$120

    per seat / month, billed yearly; $150 billed monthly

    40,000 credits per seat each month, for people who regularly run complex automations, deep research or tool-heavy workflows.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Unlimited connectors and MCP servers, workspace-pooled credits, SCIM, audit logs, custom data retention, single-tenant deployment and an SLA.

GPT Researcher

  • Open Source$0

    MIT-licensed Python package and MCP server that you host yourself; you pay your own LLM and search API providers.

Ways to pay less

Dust

  • Annual discount

    Save 20% with yearly billing

    Dust's pricing page shows a 20% saving on yearly billing: Pro is $24 per seat a month instead of $30, and Max is $120 instead of $150.

GPT Researcher

No public discounts listed.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Dust or GPT Researcher?

As of Nov 13, 2026, GPT Researcher is cheaper to start with: it is free, against $24 a month for each person for Dust. Dust starts at $24 per seat / month, billed yearly (Pro), and GPT Researcher is free.

Which has a free plan, Dust or GPT Researcher?

As of Nov 13, 2026, only GPT Researcher has a free plan. Dust does not, though it has a free trial.

Which platforms do Dust and GPT Researcher run on?

As of Nov 13, 2026, only Dust lists a web app and a browser extension and only GPT Researcher lists macOS, Windows and Linux apps. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade