GPT Researcher vs OpenHands (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 13, 2026, OpenHands grades higher than GPT Researcher: 2.4 against 2.0 out of 4.0.
Checked Nov 12, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 · graded Nov 12, 2026 and Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA
OpenHands grades higher on value for money and platforms. They get the same grade on the free plan, features and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
OpenHands
Open-source platform for AI coding agents and automations
Which one is for you
Pick GPT Researcher if
- Fits if you can run Python or Docker and want cited research reports
- Works for developers who want to choose their own search sources and models
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a hosted service, since there is none
- Skip it if you do not want a command line, as setup needs Python 3.11 or newer or Docker
- Watch out: you pay your LLM and search providers directly
- Too light on support: managed deployments and SLAs are by contacting the maintainers, with no price
Pick OpenHands if
- Fits if you can self-host and want coding agents on your own machine
- Makes sense if you already pay an LLM provider and want to use that key
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you want a hosted service, as the pricing page lists no vendor-hosted plan
- Tight if you grow, since Teams is capped at 10 users and 5,000 sessions a month
- Watch out: every plan needs your own LLM key and that cost is paid separately
- Watch out: SSO and roles are not in the free version
How we grade them
| 2.0GPAGPT ResearcherFair | 2.4GPAOpenHandsFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CThe software costs nothing, but there is no hosted service, so you host it yourself and pay LLM and search providers, a few cents to a few dollars per deep run. | BAgent Canvas is free (MIT) on your own machine, but the LLM bill is yours. Teams is $500 a month for 10 users, $50 a seat past that. |
| Free plan and trial | BFree and MIT licensed, with free retrievers like DuckDuckGo and SearXNG. The model calls are not free. | BA free open-source program you can run on a laptop, with no caps, but with your own LLM key and one shared identity. |
| Features | CPlanner, parallel researchers, many retrievers, your own files, deep research mode, MCP server and API. Managed deployments and SLAs are by contact only. | CBring-your-own-agent canvas, event-driven automations and team controls. The listing's gaps: no roles or SSO on the free version and no vendor-hosted plan. |
| Ease of use | DNo store rating on record. Python 3.11 or newer or Docker, keys and a command line are needed. | DNo store rating, and the route is to self-host it on a laptop or shared VM. |
| Platforms and integrations | CRuns on Linux, Mac and Windows as a program, with an API and MCP server. No web service or phone app. | BWeb, with GitHub, Slack, Jira, Linear and Notion listed, plus an SDK. |
| Best for | open-source research agent | running coding agents on your own machine for free |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: GPT Researcher and OpenHands. How we grade
Price against what you get
GPT Researcher has no paid plan and scores 1.7 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. OpenHands starts at $500 a month and scores 2.0.
OpenHands scores higher, and starts $500 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other AI agents on the chart, none scores higher than GPT Researcher for less, and 79 score higher than OpenHands for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- GPT Researcher also covers research and citations.
- OpenHands also covers workflow automation.
At a glance
| GPT Researcher | OpenHands | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free plan |
| Starts at | Free | $500 per month for up to 10 users |
| Free plan | None | Agent Canvas is free and open source (MIT) to self-host on a laptop or shared VM, with your own LLM key and a single shared identity. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| macOS | ||
| Windows | ||
| Linux | ||
| Made by | GPT Researcher | OpenHands |
| Price read from | gptr.dev | openhands.dev |
| Checked | Nov 13, 2026 | Nov 12, 2026 |
Worth knowing
GPT Researcher
- There is no hosted service; you run it yourself with Python 3.11 or newer, or Docker.
- You pay your LLM and search providers directly; the site gives a few cents to a few dollars per deep run as a ballpark.
- Managed deployments, private-corpus retrievers and SLAs are handled by contacting the maintainers, with no listed price.
OpenHands
- You pay your LLM provider separately: every plan is bring-your-own-key.
- Teams is capped at 10 users (+$50 a month per seat) and 5,000 sessions a month.
- The free Agent Canvas has a single shared identity, with no user roles or SSO.
- Teams and Enterprise are self-hosted; the pricing page lists no vendor-hosted plan.
Key features
GPT Researcher
- Planner and parallel researchers
- A planner splits a question into sub-questions and runs a researcher on each at the same time before a writer drafts the report.
- Many retrievers and your own files
- The site lists 20+ retrievers, including Tavily, Google, Bing, Exa, arXiv and PubMed, which can be combined with MCP servers or local documents.
- Cited reports
- Each claim in the report is tied to a numbered source. Reports can be output as markdown, PDF, docx or plain text.
- Deep research mode
- Findings seed new questions, so a run explores a tree of subtopics instead of a single pass. Depth is configurable.
- MCP server and API
- The official gptr-mcp server exposes research tools to Claude, Cursor, n8n and other MCP clients, and a FastAPI server can be run from the repository.
OpenHands
- Agent Canvas
- A workspace for chatting with coding agents, customizing them and setting automations, run locally with your own LLM key.
- Bring your own agent
- Use third-party agents such as Claude and Codex alongside OpenHands, with MCP servers and secrets on every plan.
- Event-driven automations
- Start work from GitHub, Slack, Jira, Linear, schedules or other integrations, such as PR review or CI-failure fixes.
- Team controls
- Teams adds user identity and RBAC, SSO/SAML, budgeting and usage controls, and built-in OAuth integrations.
- SDK and control plane
- The product menu lists an SDK and an Agent Control Plane for building and governing agents across an organization.
Plans
GPT Researcher
Open Source$0
MIT-licensed Python package and MCP server that you host yourself; you pay your own LLM and search API providers.
OpenHands
Agent Canvas$0
Open source (MIT), self-hosted on your laptop or a shared VM; bring your own LLM key and agent.
Teams$500
per month for up to 10 users
Self-hosted, multi-user RBAC, SSO/SAML, budgeting, built-in integrations; +$50 a month per extra seat.
EnterpriseCustom
Unlimited seats and organizations, enterprise agreement, SLA-based support and a customer success manager.
Ways to pay less
GPT Researcher
No public discounts listed.
OpenHands
- Other savings
30-day trial of Teams
The Teams plan is listed with a 30-day trial that can be started from the pricing page.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, GPT Researcher or OpenHands?
As of Nov 13, 2026, GPT Researcher is cheaper to start with: it is free, against $500 a month for OpenHands. GPT Researcher is free, and OpenHands starts at $500 per month for up to 10 users.
Which has a free plan, GPT Researcher or OpenHands?
As of Nov 13, 2026, both GPT Researcher and OpenHands have a free plan.
Which platforms do GPT Researcher and OpenHands run on?
As of Nov 13, 2026, only GPT Researcher lists macOS, Windows and Linux apps and only OpenHands lists a web app. A platform missing from a listing is one its maker's pages did not mention.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.

