Allmond vs LLMrefs (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Allmond and LLMrefs share a 2.2 GPA, neither has a free plan, and Allmond starts cheaper, at $29 a month against $79 a month.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Allmond grades higher on value for money. LLMrefs grades higher on platforms. They get the same grade on the free plan, features and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Allmond
AI visibility tracker priced by scans, with all features on all plans
LLMrefs
Keyword-based AI search visibility tracker with one flat plan
Which one is for you
Pick Allmond if
- Fits if you sell in several countries and want to see AI answers in each
- Works for agencies with many client brands, as no plan charges per project
Look elsewhere if
- Tight if you track many prompts or countries, since 240 scans go quickly
- Skip it if you need Google AI Overviews or more than four models, as only four are tracked
- Watch out: running out mid-month means an upgrade or a one-time scan pack
- Not for you if you want to pay yearly, as the pricing page doesn't offer it
Pick LLMrefs if
- Fits if you already track SEO keywords and want the same lists checked in AI answers
- Works for agencies, since projects and seats are unlimited on one plan
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you need daily data, as it refreshes about once a week per keyword
- Not for you if you need SSO, white-label reports or an enterprise tier, as none are listed
- Skip it if you need a price you can count on, as $79 is marked limited time only
- Watch out: no integrations are listed beyond the API and CSV export
How we grade them
| 2.2GPAAllmondFair | 2.2GPALLMrefsFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | BStarter is $29 a month for 240 scans, inside this category's cheapest quarter, with every feature and unlimited projects. Do the maths first, though: 50 prompts on 4 models in 2 countries is 800 scans, which means the $99 plan. | C$79 a month for 500 prompts on every engine, with unlimited projects and seats. That's mid-range for this category, between $29 and $95. But the price is marked limited time only, with no end date or regular price given. |
| Free plan and trial | CNo free plan, but a 14-day free trial with no credit card needed. After the two weeks, it's $29 a month or nothing. | CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial, and signing up needs no credit card. |
| Features | CPrompts written from your site, competitor discovery, share of voice, cited sources exported as outreach targets and a score by model and country. The gap is engines: four only, with no Google AI Overviews. | CFan-out prompts built from your keywords, share of voice and position across ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI and DeepSeek, and cited sources in 50+ countries. The gap: data refreshes weekly, not daily. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. It writes the first prompts and finds rivals for you, but you'll still plan every run around prompts, models and countries. | CNo rating on record. Importing an SEO keyword list is a familiar start, but you still set up projects, countries and competitors before the rankings say much. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only, with no integrations listed. Reports can be shared by link with people who don't have an account. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app and no integrations on record. The one plan includes an API and CSV export. |
| Best for | AI tracking across many countries | tracking AI visibility by keyword, not prompt |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Allmond and LLMrefs. How we grade
Price against what you get
Allmond starts at $29 a month and scores 2.0 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. LLMrefs starts at $79 a month and scores 2.3.
LLMrefs scores higher, and starts $50 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other AI search visibility tools on the chart, 18 score higher than Allmond for less, and 13 score higher than LLMrefs for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- Allmond also covers link outreach.
At a glance
| Allmond | LLMrefs | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free trial | Free trial |
| Starts at | $29 per month for 240 scans | $79 per month for 500 prompts |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | 14-day free trial, no credit card required | 7-day free trial; signing up needs no credit card |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Quoleady OÜ | LLMrefs |
| Price read from | allmond.app | llmrefs.com |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Allmond
- Scans run out fast: prompts × models × countries per run, so 50 prompts on 4 models in 2 countries use 800 scans.
- Extra scans mid-month need an upgrade or a one-time scan pack.
- Only four AI models are tracked: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity; Google AI Overviews is not listed.
- The pricing page does not say whether annual billing is offered.
LLMrefs
- There is one plan; the $79 price is labeled limited time only, with no end date or regular price given.
- Dashboard data refreshes at least once a week per keyword, not daily.
- The pricing page lists no enterprise tier, SSO or white-label options.
Key features
Allmond
- AI-written prompts
- Reads your website and writes the first set of buyer questions to track, which you can keep, change or add to.
- Four AI models, 67+ countries
- Scans ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity side by side, by country, with the full answer behind each result.
- Competitor discovery
- Finds competitors from your website and tracks their share of voice and the prompts where they are named instead of you.
- Citation sources for outreach
- Collects the sites and listicles AI answers cite, checks whether your brand is on them, and exports them as outreach targets.
- Visibility Score and scheduling
- A 0 to 100% score by model, prompt, country and time, with weekly or monthly scans run on a schedule.
- Shareable reports
- Share a branded dashboard by link with your own headline and call to action; viewers need no account.
LLMrefs
- Keyword-based tracking
- Import SEO keyword lists; LLMrefs generates fan-out prompts for each keyword from real AI conversations and aggregates the answers.
- Share of voice rankings
- Ranks brands against competitors per keyword by share of voice and average position, weighted across every prompt.
- Source and citation lists
- Shows and filters the URLs AI engines cite when answering about your products, to find content and outreach targets.
- Countries and languages
- Geo-targeted tracking in 50+ countries and 20+ languages, filterable by engine and country.
- Agency projects
- Unlimited projects and seats under one subscription, with client dashboards and keywords spread across projects.
- Free AI SEO tools
- An AI crawlability checker, a Reddit threads finder and an llms.txt generator come with the plan.
Plans
Allmond
Starter$29
per month for 240 scans
500 citation checks a month and every feature. One scan is one prompt on one AI model in one country.
Growth$99
per month for 825 scans
2,000 citation checks a month, aimed at growing teams and agencies with several brands.
Pro$199
per month for 1,660 scans
5,000 citation checks a month for agencies and larger companies.
LLMrefs
All in One$79
per month for 500 prompts
All AI engines, weekly reports, citations, 50+ countries, unlimited projects and users, CSV export and API. Marked limited time only.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Allmond or LLMrefs?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Allmond is cheaper to start with: $29 a month, against $79 a month for LLMrefs. Allmond starts at $29 per month for 240 scans, and LLMrefs starts at $79 per month for 500 prompts.
Which has a free plan, Allmond or LLMrefs?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Allmond nor LLMrefs has a free plan. Both have a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.