Ayzeo vs CiteFlow (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Ayzeo and CiteFlow share a 2.2 GPA, neither has a free plan, and Ayzeo starts cheaper, at $31 a month against $33 a month.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Ayzeo grades higher on value for money. CiteFlow grades higher on the free plan. They get the same grade on features, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Ayzeo
AI visibility tracking priced per project, with white-label reports
CiteFlow
AI visibility scanner with weekly AI answer checks and code fixes
Which one is for you
Pick Ayzeo if
- Fits if you're a small brand watching ChatGPT and AI Overview only
- Works for agencies sending white-label reports under their own name, on Pro at $119 a month yearly
Look elsewhere if
- Pricey if you want Gemini, Perplexity and Claude too, at $29 each per project a month
- Not for you if you want to try it without a card, as the Pro trial charges on day 15
- Tight if you're on Starter, with 20 prompts refreshed weekly and no GA, Search Console or MCP
- Watch out: extra prompts are $15 per 10 a month, and a branded client dashboard is $299 a month
- Skip it if you need the full API, which is only on Enterprise from $6,000 a month
Pick CiteFlow if
- Fits if you're a developer and want AI visibility fixes as pull requests
- Works for a single small site that needs a weekly look at AI citations
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if your site isn't in a GitHub repo, as Auto-Fix can't reach it
- Too light for brands tracking dozens of buyer questions, with 10 per site
- Not for you if you want a refund on a monthly plan, as those aren't refundable
- Pricey if you add sites or fixes: $9.99 per extra site and $14.99 per extra Auto-Fix run
- Watch out: the free account gives 3 scans with scores only and doesn't refill
How we grade them
| 2.2GPAAyzeoFair | 2.2GPACiteFlowFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | BStarter is $31 a month billed yearly, or $39 monthly, for 1 project with 20 prompts, site scans and 3 pages a day. That's inside this category's cheaper quarter. Gemini, Perplexity, Claude or Grok add $29 a month each per project, though. | CStandard is $399 a year, about $33 a month, or $49 monthly, for 1 site, 10 weekly questions and 2 Auto-Fix runs. That's right at the edge of this category's cheaper quarter, and 10 questions a week is a small sample. |
| Free plan and trial | DA 14-day trial of Pro, but it needs a card and the first charge comes on day 15. A free sign-up offers basic analysis, which the site doesn't describe. | CA free account with no card gets 3 one-off scans, scores only, with issue detail for 2 of the 7 areas. It doesn't refill, so it's a taste rather than a plan. |
| Features | CMention, citation and position rates with sentiment, week-by-week answers per prompt, a site scan that writes llms.txt and JSON-LD, a page writer and broken-link checks on Pro. The gap: only ChatGPT and AI Overview are included. | CA seven-part site scan, weekly checks on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, PR-based fixes, crawler alerts and plain-English reports. The gaps: just 10 tracked questions per site, and Auto-Fix only works for sites kept in GitHub. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. Setup is a project, prompts and competitors, then deciding which paid engines and prompt packs you need. | CNo rating on record. A scan is just a URL, but the fixes mean connecting a GitHub repo and reviewing pull requests, which suits developers more than marketers. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. Pro adds Google Analytics, Search Console and an MCP server for ChatGPT and Claude; the full API is Enterprise only. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. It connects to GitHub and has a REST API with Node.js and Python SDKs for running scans from CI. |
| Best for | ChatGPT and AI Overview tracking | AI visibility fixes delivered as pull requests |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Ayzeo and CiteFlow. How we grade
Price against what you get
Ayzeo starts at $31 a month and scores 2.3 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. CiteFlow starts at $33 a month and scores 2.3.
They score the same, and Ayzeo starts $2 a month lower. Of the other AI search visibility tools on the chart, 7 score higher than Ayzeo for less, and 7 score higher than CiteFlow for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- Ayzeo also covers content optimization.
At a glance
| Ayzeo | CiteFlow | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free trial | Free trial |
| Starts at | $31 per month for 1 project, billed annually ($39 billed monthly) | $33 per month for 1 website, billed annually ($49 billed monthly) |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | 14-day free trial of Pro with 3 projects and 20 prompts each; card required | Free account with 3 one-off URL scans showing scores only; no card needed, and it does not refill |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Fyrma Inc. | AgentAxis Corp |
| Price read from | ayzeo.com | citeflow.io |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Ayzeo
- Only ChatGPT and Google AI Overview are included; Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Grok are $29 per engine per project a month, DeepSeek on request.
- Starter has no white-label reports, URL Health, Google Analytics, Search Console or MCP access; those start at Pro.
- The free trial covers Pro only and needs a card; the first charge comes on day 15. A free sign-up offers basic analysis, not described in detail.
- Extra prompts are $15 a month per pack of 10 per project; a branded client dashboard is $299 a month on Pro.
CiteFlow
- The free account allows 3 one-off scans with scores only and issue detail for 2 of 7 areas; rescans and reports need a paid plan.
- Each site gets 10 tracked buyer questions a week; more sites are $9.99 each and extra Auto-Fix runs $14.99.
- The Auto-Fix Agent works through GitHub pull requests, so sites not kept in a GitHub repo cannot use it.
- Monthly subscriptions are not refundable; annual plans have a 7-day refund window with usage limits.
Key features
Ayzeo
- AI visibility tracking
- Mention, citation and visibility rates, sentiment and average position for every prompt and engine, beside the competitors the answers recommend.
- Prompt Insights
- Read what each engine answered for a prompt over the weeks, with the brands named, their positions and the sources behind them.
- Website analysis
- Scores a site for technical health and AI readiness, ranks the fixes, and generates llms.txt, JSON-LD and meta tags.
- Content Optimizer
- Writes pages from a question with an answer first, sections, a FAQ and matching structured data: 3 pages a day on Starter, 10 on Pro.
- URL Health
- On Pro, finds links to your site in AI answers that lead to missing pages and suggests redirect rules.
- White-label reports and integrations
- Pro adds branded PDF and Word reports on a schedule, Google Analytics and Search Console data, and an MCP server for AI assistants.
CiteFlow
- Seven-part AI visibility scan
- Scores technical setup, AI crawler access, schema, citability, platform metadata, content quality and brand mentions, with the fix for each issue.
- Weekly AI answer checks
- Every Monday, paid plans ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude 10 buyer questions per site and show which answers cite you and who instead.
- Auto-Fix Agent
- Connects to a chosen GitHub repo and opens pull requests that fix crawler access, structured data, llms.txt and page titles for you to review.
- Monitoring and alerts
- Weekly automatic rescans, daily checks for blocked crawlers or lost schema, and same-day alerts, with before and after comparisons.
- Visibility executive reports
- AI-written summaries of scan results in business language for non-technical readers: 3 a month on Standard, 10 on Pro.
- Partner API
- A REST API with Node.js and Python SDKs for running scans from CI pipelines or internal dashboards.
Plans
Ayzeo
Starter$31
per month for 1 project, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
20 prompts per project on ChatGPT and Google AI Overview, refreshed weekly, site scans and 3 content pages a day. Extra projects $39 a month.
Pro$119
per month for 3 projects, billed annually ($149 billed monthly)
40 prompts per project refreshed every 2nd day, white-label reports, URL Health, GA and Search Console, and an MCP server. Extra projects $49 a month.
Enterprise$6,000
per month and up, billed by invoice
300+ projects, every add-on engine, a fully white-label platform with custom domain, self-hosted option and full API. Sold through sales.
CiteFlow
Standard$33
per month for 1 website, billed annually ($49 billed monthly)
10 buyer questions a week on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, 2 Auto-Fix runs and 3 reports a month, 15 rescans a day. $399 a year.
Pro$103
per month for 5 websites, billed annually ($149 billed monthly)
The same weekly checks for five sites, 10 Auto-Fix runs and 10 reports a month, and 50 rescans a day. $1,240 a year.
Agency$499
per month and up
Everything in Pro across a client list, priced on its size through a conversation with the vendor.
Ways to pay less
Ayzeo
- Annual discount
Save 20% with yearly billing
Ayzeo's pricing page lists yearly billing at 20% less on plans and extra projects: Starter is $370 a year and Pro $1,430 a year.
CiteFlow
- Annual discount
Save 32% with annual billing
CiteFlow's pricing page lists Standard at $399 a year (about $33 a month) instead of $49 monthly, and Pro at $1,240 a year instead of $149 monthly.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Ayzeo or CiteFlow?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Ayzeo is cheaper to start with: $31 a month, against $33 a month for CiteFlow. Ayzeo starts at $31 per month for 1 project, billed annually ($39 billed monthly), and CiteFlow starts at $33 per month for 1 website, billed annually ($49 billed monthly).
Which has a free plan, Ayzeo or CiteFlow?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Ayzeo nor CiteFlow has a free plan. Both have a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.