Ayzeo vs Otterly.AI (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI grades higher than Ayzeo: 2.4 against 2.2 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Otterly.AI grades higher on the free plan. They get the same grade on value for money, features, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Ayzeo
AI visibility tracking priced per project, with white-label reports
Otterly.AI
Daily brand and citation tracking across AI search engines
Which one is for you
Pick Ayzeo if
- Fits if you're a small brand watching ChatGPT and AI Overview only
- Works for agencies sending white-label reports under their own name, on Pro at $119 a month yearly
Look elsewhere if
- Pricey if you want Gemini, Perplexity and Claude too, at $29 each per project a month
- Not for you if you want to try it without a card, as the Pro trial charges on day 15
- Tight if you're on Starter, with 20 prompts refreshed weekly and no GA, Search Console or MCP
- Watch out: extra prompts are $15 per 10 a month, and a branded client dashboard is $299 a month
- Skip it if you need the full API, which is only on Enterprise from $6,000 a month
Pick Otterly.AI if
- Fits if a daily read on ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and Copilot is what you need
- Works for agencies that brand client reports through Looker Studio, from Standard
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if Gemini, AI Mode or Claude matter to you, as they're paid add-ons on every plan, and all seven engines add $227 a month on Standard
- Not for you if you need white-label reports, as there aren't any
- Tight if you start on Lite, with 15 prompts, one workspace, no API or MCP, and no extra prompt packs
- Pricey if you outgrow Lite, as Standard is $160 a month yearly and extra prompts are $99 per 100, with 300 at most before Premium at $422
- Watch out: Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model, and crawler analytics needs server log files you upload
How we grade them
| 2.2GPAAyzeoFair | 2.4GPAOtterly.AIFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | BStarter is $31 a month billed yearly, or $39 monthly, for 1 project with 20 prompts, site scans and 3 pages a day. That's inside this category's cheaper quarter. Gemini, Perplexity, Claude or Grok add $29 a month each per project, though. | BLite is $25 a month billed yearly ($29 monthly) for 15 prompts on four engines with unlimited team members, inside the cheaper quarter of AI visibility tools at $29. The API, MCP and Agent Analytics wait on Standard at $160, and Gemini, AI Mode and Claude cost extra. |
| Free plan and trial | DA 14-day trial of Pro, but it needs a card and the first charge comes on day 15. A free sign-up offers basic analysis, which the site doesn't describe. | CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial with 50 prompts and no credit card needed. |
| Features | CMention, citation and position rates with sentiment, week-by-week answers per prompt, a site scan that writes llms.txt and JSON-LD, a page writer and broken-link checks on Pro. The gap: only ChatGPT and AI Overview are included. | CDaily mentions, share of voice and sentiment per engine in 70+ countries, link citation analysis, prompt research, a GEO audit and crawler analytics. The gap: Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan, and there's no white-label. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. Setup is a project, prompts and competitors, then deciding which paid engines and prompt packs you need. | CNo rating on record. You set the prompts to watch, and the crawler analytics means uploading your own server log files. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. Pro adds Google Analytics, Search Console and an MCP server for ChatGPT and Claude; the full API is Enterprise only. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. There's an API, an MCP server and a Looker Studio connector from Standard, plus a link with Semrush. |
| Best for | ChatGPT and AI Overview tracking | daily brand and citation checks in AI search |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Ayzeo and Otterly.AI. How we grade
Price against what you get
Ayzeo starts at $31 a month and scores 2.3 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Otterly.AI starts at $25 a month and scores 2.3.
They score the same, and Otterly.AI starts $6 a month lower. Of the other AI search visibility tools on the chart, 7 score higher than Ayzeo for less, and 4 score higher than Otterly.AI for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- Ayzeo also covers content optimization and schema markup.
At a glance
| Ayzeo | Otterly.AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free trial | Free trial |
| Starts at | $31 per month for 1 project, billed annually ($39 billed monthly) | $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly) |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | 14-day free trial of Pro with 3 projects and 20 prompts each; card required | 7-day free trial with 50 prompts, no credit card required |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Fyrma Inc. | OtterlyAI GmbH |
| Price read from | ayzeo.com | otterly.ai |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Ayzeo
- Only ChatGPT and Google AI Overview are included; Gemini, Perplexity, Claude and Grok are $29 per engine per project a month, DeepSeek on request.
- Starter has no white-label reports, URL Health, Google Analytics, Search Console or MCP access; those start at Pro.
- The free trial covers Pro only and needs a card; the first charge comes on day 15. A free sign-up offers basic analysis, not described in detail.
- Extra prompts are $15 a month per pack of 10 per project; a branded client dashboard is $299 a month on Pro.
Otterly.AI
- Google AI Mode and Gemini cost $9, $59 or $149 a month each by plan, and Claude $29, $109 or $439, so all seven engines on Standard add $227 a month.
- Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan; Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model.
- Lite has one workspace; extra prompts are sold in packs of 100 on Standard and Premium only.
- There is no white-label option; the Looker Studio connector is the suggested way to brand client reports.
Key features
Ayzeo
- AI visibility tracking
- Mention, citation and visibility rates, sentiment and average position for every prompt and engine, beside the competitors the answers recommend.
- Prompt Insights
- Read what each engine answered for a prompt over the weeks, with the brands named, their positions and the sources behind them.
- Website analysis
- Scores a site for technical health and AI readiness, ranks the fixes, and generates llms.txt, JSON-LD and meta tags.
- Content Optimizer
- Writes pages from a question with an answer first, sections, a FAQ and matching structured data: 3 pages a day on Starter, 10 on Pro.
- URL Health
- On Pro, finds links to your site in AI answers that lead to missing pages and suggests redirect rules.
- White-label reports and integrations
- Pro adds branded PDF and Word reports on a schedule, Google Analytics and Search Console data, and an MCP server for AI assistants.
Otterly.AI
- Daily prompt monitoring
- Tracks set prompts every day and reports brand mentions, coverage, share of voice and sentiment per engine, in more than 70 countries.
- Link citation analysis
- Shows which URLs and domains each AI engine cites for a prompt, with a domain ranking to find the sources worth targeting.
- AI prompt research
- Suggests prompts customers are likely to ask AI search tools about a brand or topic, as a starting set to monitor.
- GEO audit
- A technical audit of site URLs for generative engine readiness; Lite allows 1,000 audited URLs a month, Premium 10,000.
- Agent Analytics
- Reports AI agent and crawler visits to your site from server log files you upload.
- API, MCP and Looker Studio
- An API and MCP server give programmatic access to the data; the Looker Studio connector comes with Standard and above.
Plans
Ayzeo
Starter$31
per month for 1 project, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
20 prompts per project on ChatGPT and Google AI Overview, refreshed weekly, site scans and 3 content pages a day. Extra projects $39 a month.
Pro$119
per month for 3 projects, billed annually ($149 billed monthly)
40 prompts per project refreshed every 2nd day, white-label reports, URL Health, GA and Search Console, and an MCP server. Extra projects $49 a month.
Enterprise$6,000
per month and up, billed by invoice
300+ projects, every add-on engine, a fully white-label platform with custom domain, self-hosted option and full API. Sold through sales.
Otterly.AI
Lite$25
per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly)
15 prompts tracked daily on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, unlimited team members, one workspace. No API, MCP or extra prompts.
Standard$160
per month, billed yearly ($189 billed monthly)
100 prompts, API, MCP and Agent Analytics. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month, up to 300 more before you must move to Premium.
Premium$422
per month, billed yearly ($489 billed monthly)
400 prompts with everything in Standard. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month.
EnterpriseCustom
From 1,000 prompts, with SSO, custom terms, a quarterly GEO health check and a dedicated success manager.
Ways to pay less
Ayzeo
- Annual discount
Save 20% with yearly billing
Ayzeo's pricing page lists yearly billing at 20% less on plans and extra projects: Starter is $370 a year and Pro $1,430 a year.
Otterly.AI
No public discounts listed.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Ayzeo or Otterly.AI?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI is cheaper to start with: $25 a month, against $31 a month for Ayzeo. Ayzeo starts at $31 per month for 1 project, billed annually ($39 billed monthly), and Otterly.AI starts at $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly).
Which has a free plan, Ayzeo or Otterly.AI?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Ayzeo nor Otterly.AI has a free plan. Both have a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.