Skip to content

Erlin vs Profound (2026): which should you pick?

As of Oct 23, 2026, Profound grades higher than Erlin: 2.2 against 1.8 out of 4.0.

Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA

Erlin grades higher on value for money. Profound grades higher on the free plan and features. They get the same grade on ease of use and platforms.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

Erlin

AI search visibility tracking, content writing and lead follow-up

From $47/mo

Profound

AI search visibility tracking with an AI marketing agent built in

Free trial · from $99/mo

Which one is for you

Pick Erlin if

  • Fits if you want AI tracking and article writing in one subscription, from Standard
  • Works for teams that want visits from AI answers tied to leads through GA4

Look elsewhere if

  • Not for you if you want to pay monthly, as every plan is billed yearly
  • Skip it if Google AI Overviews matters, since it isn't among the engines listed
  • Pricey if you need Claude or an API, which start at Pro for $397 a month
  • Too light for writing on Starter, which has no content generation
  • Watch out: there's no free trial; each plan opens with a 7-day trial that costs $7

Pick Profound if

  • Fits if you're a large brand that wants answers tracked on up to 9 engines and can sign a custom contract
  • Works for agencies running pitch audits for prospects, at $99 a month for 10 short workspaces

Look elsewhere if

  • Skip it if you want to sign up and pay without a sales call, as brands can't
  • Pricey if you're an agency with several clients, at $399 a month per client workspace on top of $99
  • Tight if you want to test your own questions, since the trial's prompts are fixed
  • Watch out: custom prompts, the API, exports and SSO all come only with Enterprise
  • Watch out: agents spend credits, and extra credits need an Enterprise package with overage billing or a pause

How we grade them

1.8GPAErlinWeak2.2GPAProfoundFair
Value for money
CStarter is $47 a month, billed yearly as $564, in the middle stretch of this category. It has only ChatGPT and Perplexity and no writing; Standard, with Gemini and content, is $197.
DBrands get no published price: past the trial it's a custom Enterprise quote, given only on a sales call. Agency Growth is $99 a month, but that buys 10 short pitch audits, and each real client workspace is $399 a month on top.
Free plan and trial
FNothing is free. Each plan opens with a 7-day trial that costs $7, and after that it's billed by the year.
CNo free plan, but a 7-day trial runs 50 preset prompts daily on ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews. You can't edit those prompts, so you see the questions Profound picks, not your own.
Features
CPrompt discovery, mentions and share of voice, cited sources, fixes ranked by effort, writing in your brand voice and AI traffic from GA4. But its engines stop at ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, with no Google AI Overviews.
BDaily answers with citations, sentiment and competitor ranking on up to 9 engines, Claude, Copilot and DeepSeek among them, plus an AI Marketer, reusable agents, Prompt Volumes and crawler analytics across unlimited domains. It covers the whole job; the agents run on credits.
Ease of use
CNo rating on record. Prompts are suggested for you, but there's a Brand Memory to fill in and Analytics and Search Console to connect.
CNo rating on record. Brands are onboarded through sales, and custom prompts, exports and the API only arrive with Enterprise, so there's set-up before it's really yours.
Platforms and integrations
BWeb only, linked to Google Analytics, Search Console, Slack, HubSpot, Zoho CRM, Telegram, Gmail and Calendly, with an API from Pro.
BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. It connects to Google Analytics, Search Console, Cloudflare, Vercel, WordPress, Webflow, Slack and G2, and the API comes with Enterprise.
Best forAI tracking with article writing on higher plansbig brands tracking AI answers on many engines

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Erlin and Profound. How we grade

Price against what you get

Erlin starts at $47 a month and scores 2.3 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Profound starts at $99 a month and scores 2.7.

Profound scores higher, and starts $52 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other AI search visibility tools on the chart, 10 score higher than Erlin for less, and 1 scores higher than Profound for less.

Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged

D1.0C2.0B3.0A4.0Free$5$10$20$50$100$200$500$1kMore for lessCosts more, scores moreCosts less, scores lessCosts more, scores lessErlinProfound

What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →

  • The best score at each price
  • Has a free plan
  • No free plan
The full chart of AI search visibility tools, and the best at every price

Where they differ

  • Erlin also covers long-form writing and chatbots.
  • Profound also covers AI agents.
In commonWebPublic APIWeb analyticsAI search visibilityContent optimization

At a glance

ErlinProfound
PricingPaidFree trial
Starts at$47 per month for 50 prompts, billed annually ($564 a year)$99 per month (Agency Growth, the self-serve plan for agencies)
Free planNoneNone
Free trialNone listed7-day free trial: 50 preset prompts run daily on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, with limited AI Marketer credits
Web
Made byErlin.AIProfound
Price read fromerlin.aitryprofound.com
CheckedOct 23, 2026Oct 23, 2026

Worth knowing

Erlin

  • Plans are billed yearly; each starts with a 7-day trial that costs $7 rather than a free one.
  • Starter tracks only ChatGPT and Perplexity and has no content writing; Gemini starts at Standard and Claude at Pro.
  • API access starts at Pro, at $397 a month billed yearly.
  • Lead qualification is a beta add-on with pricing on request; a done-for-you service, Erlin Select, is by application.

Profound

  • Brands have no self-serve paid plan: after the 7-day trial, ongoing tracking needs a custom-priced Enterprise contract.
  • Trial users get a recommended prompt set and cannot edit it; custom prompts, API access, exports and SSO come with Enterprise.
  • On Agency Growth, each full client workspace is a $399-a-month add-on and 5 more trial workspaces cost $199 a month.
  • Agent runs use credits; extra credits beyond the plan need an Enterprise package, with overage billing or a pause set by the account team.

Key features

Erlin

Prompt discovery
Suggests the questions buyers in your industry ask AI, with the intent, buying stage and demand Erlin estimates for each.
Visibility and competitors
Tracks mentions, sentiment and share of voice across the engines on your plan and shows which brands are recommended instead.
Opportunities and citations
Lists the sources AI answers draw on in your industry and ranks fixes by effort and impact so they can be assigned and tracked.
Content in your brand voice
From Standard, researches, outlines and drafts articles or improves existing pages, guided by a Brand Memory of your products, voice and rules.
AI traffic tracking
Connects Google Analytics 4 and Search Console to show visits and leads that trace back to AI answers, on every plan.
Lead qualification add-on
A website chatbot that answers and qualifies visitors, email and Telegram follow-up, and a CRM view; in beta, priced on request.

Profound

Answer Engine Insights
Runs set prompts daily and reports where a brand appears in the answers, which sources are cited, sentiment and how it ranks against competitors.
Wide engine coverage
Enterprise can track ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek, Claude, Google AI Overviews and Exa Search.
AI Marketer and agents
An assistant that finds gaps in AI answers and drafts or rewrites pages, plus reusable agents for recurring work. Agents run on credits.
Agent Analytics
Tracks AI crawler visits and AI-referred traffic across unlimited domains by connecting to CDNs and hosts such as Cloudflare, Fastly, AWS and Vercel.
Prompt Volumes
Estimates what people ask AI answer engines about a topic; the trial allows 5 searches.
Agency workspaces
Agency plans manage short pitch workspaces for prospects and full client workspaces from one dashboard with consolidated billing.

Plans

Erlin

  • Starter$47

    per month for 50 prompts, billed annually ($564 a year)

    ChatGPT and Perplexity, 1 workspace, 10 team members and weekly reports. No content generation.

  • Standard$197

    per month for 150 prompts, billed annually ($2,364 a year)

    Adds Gemini, 3 workspaces, 50,000 content words a month (about 30 articles) and chat support.

  • Pro$397

    per month for 400 prompts, billed annually ($4,764 a year)

    Adds Claude, 5 workspaces, 50 team members, 200,000 words a month, API access and Slack support.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Unlimited workspaces, custom prompt and word limits, a custom LLM or RAG setup, custom integrations and an SLA.

Profound

  • Agency Growth$99

    per month for up to 10 pitch workspaces a month

    For agencies: 10 seven-day pitch audits a month on ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews, 5 agency seats. Each full client workspace is $399 a month extra.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    For brands: tailored prompt tracking on up to 9 answer engines, AI Marketer credits, all-time history, CSV and JSON exports, API, SSO and dedicated support.

  • Agency EnterpriseCustom

    For large agencies and networks: tailored client and trial workspaces, a dedicated agency partner, go-to-market help and Slack support.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Erlin or Profound?

As of Oct 23, 2026, Erlin is cheaper to start with: $47 a month, against $99 a month for Profound. Erlin starts at $47 per month for 50 prompts, billed annually ($564 a year), and Profound starts at $99 per month (Agency Growth, the self-serve plan for agencies).

Which has a free plan, Erlin or Profound?

As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Erlin nor Profound has a free plan. Profound has a free trial.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade