AUQ LLMrankings vs LLMrefs (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, AUQ LLMrankings and LLMrefs share a 2.2 GPA, and only AUQ LLMrankings has a free plan.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
AUQ LLMrankings grades higher on value for money. LLMrefs grades higher on features and platforms. They get the same grade on the free plan and ease of use.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
AUQ LLMrankings
Low-cost tracker of brand mentions in ChatGPT and Gemini answers
LLMrefs
Keyword-based AI search visibility tracker with one flat plan
Which one is for you
Pick AUQ LLMrankings if
- Fits if you want a first look at your AI mentions for nothing
- Works for a small site that just wants to know whether ChatGPT or Gemini names it
Look elsewhere if
- Too light for a real AI search plan, as it covers only ChatGPT and Gemini
- Skip it if you need to see which sources AI answers cite, or their sentiment, as neither is listed
- Not for you if you need daily checks: paid plans run three times a week and free runs weekly
- Tight if you stay free, with 10 terms and 2 domains
- Watch out: there's no API or integration, and the page doesn't say if billing is monthly or yearly
Pick LLMrefs if
- Fits if you already track SEO keywords and want the same lists checked in AI answers
- Works for agencies, since projects and seats are unlimited on one plan
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if you need daily data, as it refreshes about once a week per keyword
- Not for you if you need SSO, white-label reports or an enterprise tier, as none are listed
- Skip it if you need a price you can count on, as $79 is marked limited time only
- Watch out: no integrations are listed beyond the API and CSV export
How we grade them
| 2.2GPAAUQ LLMrankingsFair | 2.2GPALLMrefsFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | AStartup is $10 a month for 50 terms and 10 competitors, well under $17.40, the line for an A in this category. Agency is $35 for 200 terms and unlimited workspaces. | C$79 a month for 500 prompts on every engine, with unlimited projects and seats. That's mid-range for this category, between $29 and $95. But the price is marked limited time only, with no end date or regular price given. |
| Free plan and trial | CFree for good with no card: 10 terms and 2 domains on ChatGPT and Gemini, checked weekly, plus manual updates. 10 terms and weekly checks are a cap you'll hit. | CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial, and signing up needs no credit card. |
| Features | DOne narrow job: whether ChatGPT or Gemini names you for a term, with charts, and competitors on paid plans. No Perplexity, Claude or AI Overviews, no source or citation analysis, and no sentiment. | CFan-out prompts built from your keywords, share of voice and position across ChatGPT, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Grok, Copilot, Meta AI and DeepSeek, and cited sources in 50+ countries. The gap: data refreshes weekly, not daily. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. There's not much to it: add your terms, domains and rivals, then wait for the checks to come in. | CNo rating on record. Importing an SEO keyword list is a familiar start, but you still set up projects, countries and competitors before the rankings say much. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb only, with no integrations or API listed. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app and no integrations on record. The one plan includes an API and CSV export. |
| Best for | a free or $10 AI mention check | tracking AI visibility by keyword, not prompt |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: AUQ LLMrankings and LLMrefs. How we grade
Price against what you get
AUQ LLMrankings starts at $10 a month and scores 1.7 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. LLMrefs starts at $79 a month and scores 2.3.
LLMrefs scores higher, and starts $69 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other AI search visibility tools on the chart, 5 score higher than AUQ LLMrankings for less, and 13 score higher than LLMrefs for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- AUQ LLMrankings also covers rank tracking.
- LLMrefs also covers reports.
At a glance
| AUQ LLMrankings | LLMrefs | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free plan | Free trial |
| Starts at | $10 per month for 50 keywords | $79 per month for 500 prompts |
| Free plan | 10 keywords and 2 brand domains, checked weekly in ChatGPT and Gemini, with free manual updates. No credit card needed. | None |
| Free trial | None listed | 7-day free trial; signing up needs no credit card |
| Web | ||
| Made by | AUQ.io | LLMrefs |
| Price read from | llmrankings.io | llmrefs.com |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
AUQ LLMrankings
- Covers only ChatGPT and Gemini; Perplexity, Claude, Copilot and Google AI Overviews are not listed.
- Checks run weekly on the free plan and three times a week on paid plans, not daily.
- The page lists no source or citation analysis, sentiment scores, API or integrations.
- The pricing does not say whether the monthly prices are billed monthly or whether annual billing exists.
LLMrefs
- There is one plan; the $79 price is labeled limited time only, with no end date or regular price given.
- Dashboard data refreshes at least once a week per keyword, not daily.
- The pricing page lists no enterprise tier, SSO or white-label options.
Key features
AUQ LLMrankings
- Brand checks by search term
- Enter the terms buyers would ask about and the tool queries ChatGPT and Gemini to see whether your brand appears in the answer.
- Competitor tracking
- Paid plans track competitors on the same terms: 10 on Startup and unlimited on Agency.
- Charts over time
- Shows brand visibility per term over time, with a competitor overview and a per-term view.
- Manual updates
- Every plan, the free one included, can trigger a fresh check by hand between scheduled updates.
LLMrefs
- Keyword-based tracking
- Import SEO keyword lists; LLMrefs generates fan-out prompts for each keyword from real AI conversations and aggregates the answers.
- Share of voice rankings
- Ranks brands against competitors per keyword by share of voice and average position, weighted across every prompt.
- Source and citation lists
- Shows and filters the URLs AI engines cite when answering about your products, to find content and outreach targets.
- Countries and languages
- Geo-targeted tracking in 50+ countries and 20+ languages, filterable by engine and country.
- Agency projects
- Unlimited projects and seats under one subscription, with client dashboards and keywords spread across projects.
- Free AI SEO tools
- An AI crawlability checker, a Reddit threads finder and an llms.txt generator come with the plan.
Plans
AUQ LLMrankings
Free$0
10 keywords and 2 brand domains, updated weekly, on ChatGPT and Gemini.
Startup$10
per month for 50 keywords
2 brand domains and 10 competitors, updated Monday, Wednesday and Friday, plus manual updates.
Agency$35
per month for 200 keywords
Unlimited competitors, tags and workspaces, updated three times a week, plus manual updates.
LLMrefs
All in One$79
per month for 500 prompts
All AI engines, weekly reports, citations, 50+ countries, unlimited projects and users, CSV export and API. Marked limited time only.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, AUQ LLMrankings or LLMrefs?
As of Oct 23, 2026, AUQ LLMrankings is cheaper to start with: $10 a month, against $79 a month for LLMrefs. AUQ LLMrankings starts at $10 per month for 50 keywords, and LLMrefs starts at $79 per month for 500 prompts.
Which has a free plan, AUQ LLMrankings or LLMrefs?
As of Oct 23, 2026, only AUQ LLMrankings has a free plan. LLMrefs does not, though it has a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.