Amadora AI vs Otterly.AI (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI grades higher than Amadora AI: 2.4 against 2.2 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Amadora AI grades higher on features. Otterly.AI grades higher on value for money and the free plan. They get the same grade on ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Amadora AI
AI search tracking plus content writing and on-page fixes
Otterly.AI
Daily brand and citation tracking across AI search engines
Which one is for you
Pick Amadora AI if
- Fits if you want tracking and content drafting in one subscription
- Works for sites on WordPress or Webflow that want approved pages published for them
Look elsewhere if
- Tight if you track a lot, as Starter has 20 prompts and more are $99 per 100
- Pricey if you need Google AI Overviews, included from Pro at $249, or Claude, an add-on on Starter
- Not for you if you want a real trial, since it lasts 3 days
- Too light for teams on Starter: 1 seat, 1 region, 1 project and no API
- Watch out: credit packs start at $49 for 200, and a strategist is $999 a month extra
Pick Otterly.AI if
- Fits if a daily read on ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and Copilot is what you need
- Works for agencies that brand client reports through Looker Studio, from Standard
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if Gemini, AI Mode or Claude matter to you, as they're paid add-ons on every plan, and all seven engines add $227 a month on Standard
- Not for you if you need white-label reports, as there aren't any
- Tight if you start on Lite, with 15 prompts, one workspace, no API or MCP, and no extra prompt packs
- Pricey if you outgrow Lite, as Standard is $160 a month yearly and extra prompts are $99 per 100, with 300 at most before Premium at $422
- Watch out: Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model, and crawler analytics needs server log files you upload
How we grade them
| 2.2GPAAmadora AIFair | 2.4GPAOtterly.AIFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | CStarter is $83 a month billed yearly ($99 monthly) for 20 prompts, 15 articles and 1 seat, in the middle of what this category charges. Add-ons pile up: extra engines from $9 a month each and 100 more prompts for $99. | BLite is $25 a month billed yearly ($29 monthly) for 15 prompts on four engines with unlimited team members, inside the cheaper quarter of AI visibility tools at $29. The API, MCP and Agent Analytics wait on Standard at $160, and Gemini, AI Mode and Claude cost extra. |
| Free plan and trial | DNo free plan, and the trial is 3 days. It needs no credit card, but 3 days is short for judging AI answers that move from week to week. | CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial with 50 prompts and no credit card needed. |
| Features | BDaily tracking with share of voice and citation share, source analysis, briefs and articles in 150+ languages, on-page fixes you approve, CMS publishing and outreach lists. The gap is Starter's three engines. | CDaily mentions, share of voice and sentiment per engine in 70+ countries, link citation analysis, prompt research, a GEO audit and crawler analytics. The gap: Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan, and there's no white-label. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. Nothing goes live without your approval, which means a queue of drafts and fixes to review, plus a CMS to connect. | CNo rating on record. You set the prompts to watch, and the crawler analytics means uploading your own server log files. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, connected to WordPress, Webflow, Search Console, Google Analytics, ChatGPT and Claude, with an API from Pro. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. There's an API, an MCP server and a Looker Studio connector from Standard, plus a link with Semrush. |
| Best for | AI tracking with the articles written for you | daily brand and citation checks in AI search |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Amadora AI and Otterly.AI. How we grade
Price against what you get
Amadora AI starts at $83 a month and scores 2.7 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Otterly.AI starts at $25 a month and scores 2.3.
Amadora AI scores higher, and starts $58 a month higher: the question is whether the extra is worth that to you. Of the other AI search visibility tools on the chart, 1 scores higher than Amadora AI for less, and 4 score higher than Otterly.AI for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- Amadora AI also covers long-form writing, keyword research, content optimization, schema markup and internal linking.
- Otterly.AI also covers reports and site audit.
At a glance
| Amadora AI | Otterly.AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free trial | Free trial |
| Starts at | $83 per month for 20 prompts, billed annually ($99 billed monthly) | $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly) |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | 3-day free trial, no credit card needed | 7-day free trial with 50 prompts, no credit card required |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Ordemio Inc. | OtterlyAI GmbH |
| Price read from | amadora.ai | otterly.ai |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Amadora AI
- Starter covers only ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini; Google AI Mode, Grok, Copilot and Claude are add-ons from $9 to $19 a month per engine at 20 prompts.
- Extra prompts cost $99 a month per 100; credits for audits and drafts beyond the allowance are sold in packs from $49 for 200.
- A dedicated SEO strategist is an add-on at $999 a month, on Pro and Growth only.
- Agencies have separate plans: Professional at $179 a month for 100 prompts and Agency at $499 for 300, with white-label branding.
Otterly.AI
- Google AI Mode and Gemini cost $9, $59 or $149 a month each by plan, and Claude $29, $109 or $439, so all seven engines on Standard add $227 a month.
- Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan; Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model.
- Lite has one workspace; extra prompts are sold in packs of 100 on Standard and Premium only.
- There is no white-label option; the Looker Studio connector is the suggested way to brand client reports.
Key features
Amadora AI
- AI visibility tracking
- Runs tracked prompts daily and reports visibility score, share of voice, average position and citation share against competitors.
- Source and citation analysis
- Traces each AI answer to the pages it cites and shows where rivals are listed on sites AI engines quote and you are not.
- Content planning and drafting
- Builds briefs, articles and landing pages from keyword and prompt gaps, in 150+ languages, with title, meta tags and JSON-LD schema.
- On-page fixes with approval
- Queues FAQ blocks, internal links, schema and metadata changes for your site; each goes live only after you approve it.
- Publishing to your CMS
- Publishes approved pages to WordPress and Webflow, with an API and plugins for other systems, and tracks clicks and AI citations afterwards.
- Outreach lists
- Builds lists of review sites, directories, media and communities that AI engines cite, and drafts outreach messages for you to review.
Otterly.AI
- Daily prompt monitoring
- Tracks set prompts every day and reports brand mentions, coverage, share of voice and sentiment per engine, in more than 70 countries.
- Link citation analysis
- Shows which URLs and domains each AI engine cites for a prompt, with a domain ranking to find the sources worth targeting.
- AI prompt research
- Suggests prompts customers are likely to ask AI search tools about a brand or topic, as a starting set to monitor.
- GEO audit
- A technical audit of site URLs for generative engine readiness; Lite allows 1,000 audited URLs a month, Premium 10,000.
- Agent Analytics
- Reports AI agent and crawler visits to your site from server log files you upload.
- API, MCP and Looker Studio
- An API and MCP server give programmatic access to the data; the Looker Studio connector comes with Standard and above.
Plans
Amadora AI
Starter$83
per month for 20 prompts, billed annually ($99 billed monthly)
ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, 15 articles a month, 300 credits, 1 project, 1 seat and 1 region. No API access.
Pro$249
per month for 100 prompts, billed annually ($299 billed monthly)
Adds Google and Google AI Overviews, 30 articles a month, 1,000 credits, 5 seats, unlimited regions and API access.
Growth$666
per month for 300 prompts, billed annually ($799 billed monthly)
5 answer engines, 120 articles a month, 3,000 credits, 3 projects and unlimited seats.
Otterly.AI
Lite$25
per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly)
15 prompts tracked daily on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, unlimited team members, one workspace. No API, MCP or extra prompts.
Standard$160
per month, billed yearly ($189 billed monthly)
100 prompts, API, MCP and Agent Analytics. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month, up to 300 more before you must move to Premium.
Premium$422
per month, billed yearly ($489 billed monthly)
400 prompts with everything in Standard. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month.
EnterpriseCustom
From 1,000 prompts, with SSO, custom terms, a quarterly GEO health check and a dedicated success manager.
Ways to pay less
Amadora AI
- Annual discount
Two months free with annual billing
Amadora AI's pricing page says paying yearly costs ten months, so two months are free on every plan and add-on.
Otterly.AI
No public discounts listed.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Amadora AI or Otterly.AI?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI is cheaper to start with: $25 a month, against $83 a month for Amadora AI. Amadora AI starts at $83 per month for 20 prompts, billed annually ($99 billed monthly), and Otterly.AI starts at $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly).
Which has a free plan, Amadora AI or Otterly.AI?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Amadora AI nor Otterly.AI has a free plan. Both have a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.