CitationIQ vs Otterly.AI (2026): which should you pick?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI grades higher than CitationIQ: 2.4 against 1.6 out of 4.0.
Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA
Otterly.AI grades higher on value for money and the free plan. They get the same grade on features, ease of use and platforms.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
CitationIQ
AI citation tracking and content alignment reports on one plan
Otterly.AI
Daily brand and citation tracking across AI search engines
Which one is for you
Pick CitationIQ if
- Fits if you need evidence of AI visibility to show your boss or clients
- Works for agencies with three or more clients, at $149 per client a month
Look elsewhere if
- Pricey if you're one person with one site, at $167 a month even billed yearly
- Not for you if you want to try it before paying, as there's no trial
- Skip it if Google's AI Overviews or AI Mode are where your buyers see answers
- Watch out: agency accounts must bring their own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys and pay monthly
- Watch out: cancelling forfeits the Founding Member rate for good, and the standard rate is $208
Pick Otterly.AI if
- Fits if a daily read on ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and Copilot is what you need
- Works for agencies that brand client reports through Looker Studio, from Standard
Look elsewhere if
- Skip it if Gemini, AI Mode or Claude matter to you, as they're paid add-ons on every plan, and all seven engines add $227 a month on Standard
- Not for you if you need white-label reports, as there aren't any
- Tight if you start on Lite, with 15 prompts, one workspace, no API or MCP, and no extra prompt packs
- Pricey if you outgrow Lite, as Standard is $160 a month yearly and extra prompts are $99 per 100, with 300 at most before Premium at $422
- Watch out: Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model, and crawler analytics needs server log files you upload
How we grade them
| 1.6GPACitationIQWeak | 2.4GPAOtterly.AIFair | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | DThe Founding Member rate is $167 a month billed yearly ($1,999 a year), or $179 monthly, for 250 queries and 100 pages. That's in this category's dearest tenth, and the standard rate it replaces is $208. | BLite is $25 a month billed yearly ($29 monthly) for 15 prompts on four engines with unlimited team members, inside the cheaper quarter of AI visibility tools at $29. The API, MCP and Agent Analytics wait on Standard at $160, and Gemini, AI Mode and Claude cost extra. |
| Free plan and trial | FNothing free at all. No free plan or trial is listed, so the self-serve plan is paid from day one. | CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial with 50 prompts and no credit card needed. |
| Features | CCited, mentioned, paraphrased or absent on four engines, query expansion, section-level content scores, technical checks and competitor comparisons. The gaps: Google AI Overviews and AI Mode aren't among the engines, and each account stops at 250 queries. | CDaily mentions, share of voice and sentiment per engine in 70+ countries, link citation analysis, prompt research, a GEO audit and crawler analytics. The gap: Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan, and there's no white-label. |
| Ease of use | CNo rating on record. There are seven report types to learn, and agency accounts have to connect their own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys. | CNo rating on record. You set the prompts to watch, and the crawler analytics means uploading your own server log files. |
| Platforms and integrations | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. Standard API access is included, reports download as XLSX, and work runs in 36 languages. | BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. There's an API, an MCP server and a Looker Studio connector from Standard, plus a link with Semrush. |
| Best for | checking page sections against the questions AI gets | daily brand and citation checks in AI search |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: CitationIQ and Otterly.AI. How we grade
Price against what you get
CitationIQ starts at $167 a month and scores 2.3 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Otterly.AI starts at $25 a month and scores 2.3.
They score the same, and Otterly.AI starts $142 a month lower. Of the other AI search visibility tools on the chart, 24 score higher than CitationIQ for less, and 4 score higher than Otterly.AI for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
- CitationIQ also covers content optimization.
At a glance
| CitationIQ | Otterly.AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid | Free trial |
| Starts at | $167 per month, billed annually ($179 billed monthly) | $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly) |
| Free plan | None | None |
| Free trial | None listed | 7-day free trial with 50 prompts, no credit card required |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Nashi Holdings, LLC | OtterlyAI GmbH |
| Price read from | citationiq.com | otterly.ai |
| Checked | Oct 23, 2026 | Oct 23, 2026 |
Worth knowing
CitationIQ
- No free plan or free trial is listed; the self-serve plan is paid from the start.
- Each account manages up to 250 queries and 100 pages.
- Agency accounts must connect their own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys, and are billed monthly only.
- Cancelling forfeits the Founding Member rate for good.
Otterly.AI
- Google AI Mode and Gemini cost $9, $59 or $149 a month each by plan, and Claude $29, $109 or $439, so all seven engines on Standard add $227 a month.
- Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan; Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model.
- Lite has one workspace; extra prompts are sold in packs of 100 on Standard and Premium only.
- There is no white-label option; the Looker Studio connector is the suggested way to brand client reports.
Key features
CitationIQ
- Citation tracking
- Checks ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity for your key queries and records whether the brand is cited, mentioned, paraphrased or absent over time.
- Query alignment
- Expands seed topics into the query variations people use and scores your content against each with semantic analysis.
- Chunk performance
- Scores individual sections of your pages against target queries to show which are ready, which need work and where new content would help.
- Technical visibility
- Finds crawl problems, access restrictions and llms.txt issues that keep AI platforms from reading your content.
- Competitive intelligence
- Compares your alignment scores with competitors query by query, showing where you lead or trail.
- Exports in 36 languages
- Queries, URLs and reports can be in 36 languages, and every report downloads as XLSX, white-labeled for agency accounts.
Otterly.AI
- Daily prompt monitoring
- Tracks set prompts every day and reports brand mentions, coverage, share of voice and sentiment per engine, in more than 70 countries.
- Link citation analysis
- Shows which URLs and domains each AI engine cites for a prompt, with a domain ranking to find the sources worth targeting.
- AI prompt research
- Suggests prompts customers are likely to ask AI search tools about a brand or topic, as a starting set to monitor.
- GEO audit
- A technical audit of site URLs for generative engine readiness; Lite allows 1,000 audited URLs a month, Premium 10,000.
- Agent Analytics
- Reports AI agent and crawler visits to your site from server log files you upload.
- API, MCP and Looker Studio
- An API and MCP server give programmatic access to the data; the Looker Studio connector comes with Standard and above.
Plans
CitationIQ
Founding Member$167
per month, billed annually ($179 billed monthly)
Every report, standard API access, 250 queries and 100 pages. Rate locked for life while the account stays active; offered to early accounts. $1,999 a year.
Standard$208
per month, billed annually ($249 billed monthly)
The same full access at the standard rate, $2,490 a year. The page says all new accounts currently get the Founding Member rate instead.
Agency Getting Started$249
per client / month, billed monthly
Full access for one client account, white-label exports, and your own OpenAI and Anthropic API keys required.
Agency Growth$149
per client / month for 3+ clients, billed monthly
Volume pricing: $199 per client at 2 clients and $149 at 3 or more, applied to every client in the account.
Otterly.AI
Lite$25
per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly)
15 prompts tracked daily on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, unlimited team members, one workspace. No API, MCP or extra prompts.
Standard$160
per month, billed yearly ($189 billed monthly)
100 prompts, API, MCP and Agent Analytics. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month, up to 300 more before you must move to Premium.
Premium$422
per month, billed yearly ($489 billed monthly)
400 prompts with everything in Standard. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month.
EnterpriseCustom
From 1,000 prompts, with SSO, custom terms, a quarterly GEO health check and a dedicated success manager.
Ways to pay less
CitationIQ
- Annual discount
Lower monthly rate with annual billing
CitationIQ's pricing page lists the Founding Member rate at $167 a month billed annually ($1,999 a year), against $179 billed monthly.
Otterly.AI
No public discounts listed.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, CitationIQ or Otterly.AI?
As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI is cheaper to start with: $25 a month, against $167 a month for CitationIQ. CitationIQ starts at $167 per month, billed annually ($179 billed monthly), and Otterly.AI starts at $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly).
Which has a free plan, CitationIQ or Otterly.AI?
As of Oct 23, 2026, neither CitationIQ nor Otterly.AI has a free plan. Otterly.AI has a free trial.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
