Skip to content

Brantial vs Otterly.AI (2026): which should you pick?

As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI grades higher than Brantial: 2.4 against 2.2 out of 4.0.

Checked Oct 23, 2026 · graded Oct 23, 2026 by ToolGPA

Otterly.AI grades higher on value for money. They get the same grade on the free plan, features, ease of use and platforms.

Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.

Brantial

Daily AI visibility tracking with an AI page optimizer

Free trial · from $119/mo

Otterly.AI

Daily brand and citation tracking across AI search engines

Free trial · from $25/mo

Which one is for you

Pick Brantial if

  • Fits if you want tracking and page rewrites in one tool, with a person checking drafts
  • Works for online shops checking how products show in ChatGPT shopping cards

Look elsewhere if

  • Pricey if you pay monthly, as Starter is then $139 a month, in this category's dearest tenth
  • Tight if you run three brands on Growth, as its 150 prompts are shared
  • Skip it if Google AI Overviews matters, as it isn't among the engines listed
  • Too light for exports on Starter, which gives PDF only; CSV, JSON and white-label start at Growth
  • Watch out: agentic shopping features on the site are marked planned and aren't in current plans

Pick Otterly.AI if

  • Fits if a daily read on ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews and Copilot is what you need
  • Works for agencies that brand client reports through Looker Studio, from Standard

Look elsewhere if

  • Skip it if Gemini, AI Mode or Claude matter to you, as they're paid add-ons on every plan, and all seven engines add $227 a month on Standard
  • Not for you if you need white-label reports, as there aren't any
  • Tight if you start on Lite, with 15 prompts, one workspace, no API or MCP, and no extra prompt packs
  • Pricey if you outgrow Lite, as Standard is $160 a month yearly and extra prompts are $99 per 100, with 300 at most before Premium at $422
  • Watch out: Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model, and crawler analytics needs server log files you upload

How we grade them

2.2GPABrantialFair2.4GPAOtterly.AIFair
Value for money
CStarter is $119 a month billed yearly ($139 monthly), in this category's dearer quarter, for 50 prompts on 2 of 3 engines and 1 brand. On monthly billing it's in the dearest tenth.
BLite is $25 a month billed yearly ($29 monthly) for 15 prompts on four engines with unlimited team members, inside the cheaper quarter of AI visibility tools at $29. The API, MCP and Agent Analytics wait on Standard at $160, and Gemini, AI Mode and Claude cost extra.
Free plan and trial
CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial on both paid plans. The page doesn't say whether it needs a card.
CNo free plan, but a 7-day free trial with 50 prompts and no credit card needed.
Features
CDaily tracking with rivals, cited domains, a weekly brief, the page optimizer, an AI crawler audit, and local and shopping visibility. The gaps: 2 of 3 engines on Starter, and no Google AI Overviews among the eight engines.
CDaily mentions, share of voice and sentiment per engine in 70+ countries, link citation analysis, prompt research, a GEO audit and crawler analytics. The gap: Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan, and there's no white-label.
Ease of use
CNo rating on record. There's a lot here, from engines to pick to Search Console and GA4 to connect, and optimizer drafts need a person to check them.
CNo rating on record. You set the prompts to watch, and the crawler analytics means uploading your own server log files.
Platforms and integrations
BWeb only, connected to Search Console, GA4, Looker Studio, Slack, Shopify, WordPress, Claude and ChatGPT, with MCP access. The API is Enterprise only.
BWeb only, with no desktop or phone app. There's an API, an MCP server and a Looker Studio connector from Standard, plus a link with Semrush.
Best fordaily AI tracking with page rewritesdaily brand and citation checks in AI search

The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Brantial and Otterly.AI. How we grade

Price against what you get

Brantial starts at $119 a month and scores 2.3 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. Otterly.AI starts at $25 a month and scores 2.3.

They score the same, and Otterly.AI starts $94 a month lower. Of the other AI search visibility tools on the chart, 23 score higher than Brantial for less, and 4 score higher than Otterly.AI for less.

Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged

D1.0C2.0B3.0A4.0Free$5$10$20$50$100$200$500$1kMore for lessCosts more, scores moreCosts less, scores lessCosts more, scores lessBrantialOtterly.AI

What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →

  • The best score at each price
  • Has a free plan
  • No free plan
The full chart of AI search visibility tools, and the best at every price

Where they differ

  • Brantial also covers content optimization and local listings.
In commonWebReportsSite auditAI search visibility

At a glance

BrantialOtterly.AI
PricingFree trialFree trial
Starts at$119 per month for 50 prompts, billed annually ($139 billed monthly)$25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly)
Free planNoneNone
Free trial7-day free trial7-day free trial with 50 prompts, no credit card required
Web
Made byWebtures LTDOtterlyAI GmbH
Price read frombrantial.aiotterly.ai
CheckedOct 23, 2026Oct 23, 2026

Worth knowing

Brantial

  • Engines are chosen per plan: 2 of 3 on Starter, 3 of 6 on Growth; all eight (adding Grok, Mistral, Meta AI and DeepSeek) need Enterprise.
  • Growth's 150 prompts are shared across its three brands, not 150 each.
  • White-label reports and CSV or JSON exports start at Growth; Starter exports PDF only.
  • Agentic shopping features shown on the site are marked as planned and not included in current plans.

Otterly.AI

  • Google AI Mode and Gemini cost $9, $59 or $149 a month each by plan, and Claude $29, $109 or $439, so all seven engines on Standard add $227 a month.
  • Google AI Mode, Gemini and Claude are paid add-ons on every plan; Claude is tracked through its API using the Haiku model.
  • Lite has one workspace; extra prompts are sold in packs of 100 on Standard and Premium only.
  • There is no white-label option; the Looker Studio connector is the suggested way to brand client reports.

Key features

Brantial

Daily visibility tracking
Visibility, rank, position and sentiment per prompt and engine, side by side with competitors, with new rivals flagged automatically.
Citations and weekly brief
Ranks the domains behind AI answers by share and sends a plain-language weekly summary of what moved and which questions you won.
AI Page Optimizer
Rewrites a page around a target question, checks its facts against your source and adds structured data; drafts need human review.
Site Health & AI Readiness
Audits pages the way AI crawlers read them, including schema and metadata: 5,000 URLs a month on Starter, 25,000 on Growth.
Local and shopping visibility
Shows where branches appear in ChatGPT's near-me answers and how products show in ChatGPT shopping cards, with price and rating.
Traffic and reporting connections
Puts Search Console and GA4 data beside AI visibility, with Slack alerts, a Looker Studio report, MCP access and Shopify and WordPress links.

Otterly.AI

Daily prompt monitoring
Tracks set prompts every day and reports brand mentions, coverage, share of voice and sentiment per engine, in more than 70 countries.
Link citation analysis
Shows which URLs and domains each AI engine cites for a prompt, with a domain ranking to find the sources worth targeting.
AI prompt research
Suggests prompts customers are likely to ask AI search tools about a brand or topic, as a starting set to monitor.
GEO audit
A technical audit of site URLs for generative engine readiness; Lite allows 1,000 audited URLs a month, Premium 10,000.
Agent Analytics
Reports AI agent and crawler visits to your site from server log files you upload.
API, MCP and Looker Studio
An API and MCP server give programmatic access to the data; the Looker Studio connector comes with Standard and above.

Plans

Brantial

  • Starter$119

    per month for 50 prompts, billed annually ($139 billed monthly)

    1 brand, 2 of 3 engines, daily checks, 10 competitors, 20 AI Page Optimizer runs, 2 editors. $1,428 a year.

  • Growth$449

    per month for 150 prompts, billed annually ($529 billed monthly)

    3 brands, 3 of 6 engines, 50 competitors, 45 optimizer runs, 10 editors and white-label reports. $5,388 a year.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    All eight engines, scope agreed per proposal, API and custom reporting, SSO/SAML and onboarding.

Otterly.AI

  • Lite$25

    per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly)

    15 prompts tracked daily on ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot, unlimited team members, one workspace. No API, MCP or extra prompts.

  • Standard$160

    per month, billed yearly ($189 billed monthly)

    100 prompts, API, MCP and Agent Analytics. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month, up to 300 more before you must move to Premium.

  • Premium$422

    per month, billed yearly ($489 billed monthly)

    400 prompts with everything in Standard. Extra prompts are $99 per 100 a month.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    From 1,000 prompts, with SSO, custom terms, a quarterly GEO health check and a dedicated success manager.

Ways to pay less

Brantial

  • Annual discount

    Save up to $960 a year with annual billing

    Annual billing costs $1,428 for Starter instead of $139 a month, saving $240, and $5,388 for Growth, saving $960.

Otterly.AI

No public discounts listed.

Common questions

Which is cheaper, Brantial or Otterly.AI?

As of Oct 23, 2026, Otterly.AI is cheaper to start with: $25 a month, against $119 a month for Brantial. Brantial starts at $119 per month for 50 prompts, billed annually ($139 billed monthly), and Otterly.AI starts at $25 per month, billed yearly ($29 billed monthly).

Which has a free plan, Brantial or Otterly.AI?

As of Oct 23, 2026, neither Brantial nor Otterly.AI has a free plan. Both have a free trial.

More comparisons

How this page was made

  • The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
  • The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
  • Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
  • The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.
How we review and grade