Fumadocs vs VitePress (2026): which should you pick?
As of Nov 13, 2026, Fumadocs and VitePress share a 2.6 GPA, both are free, so the choice depends on which features you need.
Checked Nov 13, 2026 · graded Nov 13, 2026 by ToolGPA
They get the same grade on all five counts.
Price, platforms and features side by side. The table says where each price was read and when.
Fumadocs
React documentation framework that works with several frameworks
Free
Which one is for you
Pick Fumadocs if
- Fits if you build with React and want a docs site on the same stack
- Works for API docs generated from OpenAPI specs
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if you don't write code, as it's a framework rather than a finished tool
- Skip it if you want a hosted editor, as there are no accounts
- Watch out: you deploy and host the site yourself
- Watch out: the introduction recommends Next.js for new projects, and a separate Fumapress generator is mentioned
Pick VitePress if
- Fits if your team writes docs in Markdown next to its code
- Works for Vue projects that want a docs site on the same tooling
Look elsewhere if
- Not for you if nobody on the team uses a command line or Node.js
- Skip it if you want a hosted editor, as there are no accounts or comments
- Watch out: you host and deploy the static site yourself
- Watch out: the site lists a 2.0 alpha alongside the 1.6.4 release
How we grade them
| 2.6GPAFumadocsGood | 2.6GPAVitePressGood | |
|---|---|---|
| Value for money | AFree and open source under the MIT License; you pay only for the hosting. A program anyone can download and run is graded as free and substantial. | AFree and open source under the MIT License; you pay only for the hosting. A program anyone can download and run is graded as free and substantial. |
| Free plan and trial | AFree outright, with no plan or cap. The only cost is wherever you host the output. | AFree outright, with no plan or cap. The only cost is wherever you host the output. |
| Features | CLayouts, themes, search options and API docs from specs. A framework you write code against, with no editor or accounts. | CMarkdown with extensions, Vue in pages, a default theme and local search. It builds a static site and does nothing past that: no editor, accounts or comments. |
| Ease of use | DIt's a developer tool run from the command line with files you write yourself. No store rating on record. | DIt's a developer tool run from the command line with files you write yourself. No store rating on record. |
| Platforms and integrations | CWeb output only, with Next.js, React Router, TanStack Start, Waku, Algolia, Orama Cloud and Typesense. No app. | CWeb output only, with Vite, Vue, Algolia DocSearch and MiniSearch. No app or hosted service. |
| Best for | React docs sites across several frameworks | a Markdown docs site built on Vite and Vue |
The GPA is the average of the five grades: an A is 4 points, an F is none. The full reasons are on each tool's page: Fumadocs and VitePress. How we grade
Price against what you get
Fumadocs has no paid plan and scores 1.7 out of 4 on features, ease of use and platforms. VitePress has no paid plan and scores 1.7.
On this chart the two sit in the same place: the same score for the same starting price. Of the other docs and wiki tools on the chart, none scores higher than Fumadocs for less, and none scores higher than VitePress for less.
Features, ease of use and platforms, averaged
What paid plans start at, a month (each step along is roughly double) →
- The best score at each price
- Has a free plan
- No free plan
Where they differ
In commonFree planWebOpen sourceMarkdownTemplatesDocuments
At a glance
| Fumadocs | VitePress | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Starts at | Free | Free |
| Free plan | Free and open source under the MIT License; you pay only for wherever you host the output. | Free and open source under the MIT License; you pay only for wherever you host the output. |
| Free trial | None listed | None listed |
| Web | ||
| Made by | Fumadocs (Fuma Nama and contributors) | VitePress (Evan You and contributors) |
| Price read from | github.com | vitepress.dev |
| Checked | Nov 13, 2026 | Nov 13, 2026 |
Worth knowing
Fumadocs
- It is a developer framework: you write code and files, and it needs a React framework underneath.
- There is no hosted editor or accounts; you deploy and host the site yourself.
- The introduction page recommends Next.js for new projects, and a separate Fumapress generator is mentioned.
VitePress
- It is a developer tool: you write files, run a command-line build and need Node.js 22 or higher.
- There is no hosted editor, user accounts or comments for staff; you host and deploy the static site yourself.
- The site lists a 2.0 alpha alongside the 1.6.4 release.
Key features
Fumadocs
- Layered architecture
- Core logic, a UI theme, a content source and a CLI are separate packages, so parts can be swapped or customized.
- Several React frameworks
- Setup guides exist for Next.js, React Router, TanStack Start, Waku and Astro.
- Layouts and themes
- Docs, Notebook, Flux, Glass, Spacious and Home layouts, plus color themes such as Neutral, Ocean and shadcn/ui.
- Search options
- The docs list built-in search plus Algolia, FlexSearch, Meilisearch, Mixedbread, Orama Cloud, Trieve and Typesense.
- API docs from specs
- The homepage shows OpenAPI, GraphQL and AsyncAPI pages generated from specifications, and type hints with Twoslash.
VitePress
- Markdown with extensions
- Frontmatter, tables, syntax highlighting and several code-block features are built in, aimed at technical documentation.
- Vue inside Markdown
- Each Markdown page can use Vue syntax and components, and custom themes are built as Vue applications.
- Default documentation theme
- A ready theme with nav, sidebar, edit links, last-updated timestamps and a team page.
- Built-in local search
- A fuzzy full-text search index runs in the browser once enabled with one config option; Algolia DocSearch and community plugins are alternatives.
- Static output and Vite tooling
- Pages are built as static HTML with client-side navigation, and Vite plugins can be used. Deploy guides and i18n support are documented.
Plans
Fumadocs
Open source$0
Free under the MIT License. You build the site with a React framework and host it yourself.
VitePress
Open source$0
Free under the MIT License. You build the site with Node.js and host the static output yourself.
Common questions
Which is cheaper, Fumadocs or VitePress?
As of Nov 13, 2026, both Fumadocs and VitePress are free to use.
Which has a free plan, Fumadocs or VitePress?
As of Nov 13, 2026, both Fumadocs and VitePress have a free plan.
More comparisons
How this page was made
- The verdict at the top follows a fixed rule. When both tools are in the same category and either is in our top three for it, the verdict follows that ranking: the higher-placed tool is our pick. The top three weigh who each tool suits as well as its grades, so a pick can go against the GPA. Otherwise the page does not pick one and says which grades higher: the higher GPA first; on a tie, the one with a free plan, then the one that starts cheaper in dollars a month, counted the same way for both; if they are still level, what the choice depends on.
- The grades are our own, from each tool’s review or report card. The GPA is their average.
- Prices, plans and platforms come from each tool’s listing. The table above says where each price was read and when.
- The differences and the answers to the questions are worked out from those listings.